Redundancy and the Evolution of Cis-Regulatory Element Multiplicity

The promoter regions of many genes contain multiple binding sites for the same transcription factor (TF). One possibility is that this multiplicity evolved through transitional forms showing redundant cis-regulation. To evaluate this hypothesis, we must disentangle the relative contributions of different evolutionary mechanisms to the evolution of binding site multiplicity. Here, we attempt to do this using a model of binding site evolution. Our model considers binding sequences and their interactions with TFs explicitly, and allows us to cast the evolution of gene networks into a neutral network framework. We then test some of the model's predictions using data from yeast. Analysis of the model suggested three candidate nonadaptive processes favoring the evolution of cis-regulatory element redundancy and multiplicity: neutral evolution in long promoters, recombination and TF promiscuity. We find that recombination rate is positively associated with binding site multiplicity in yeast. Our model also indicated that weak direct selection for multiplicity (partial redundancy) can play a major role in organisms with large populations. Our data suggest that selection for changes in gene expression level may have contributed to the evolution of multiple binding sites in yeast. We conclude that the evolution of cis-regulatory element redundancy and multiplicity is impacted by many aspects of the biology of an organism: both adaptive and nonadaptive processes, both changes in cis to binding sites and in trans to the TFs that interact with them, both the functional setting of the promoter and the population genetic context of the individuals carrying them.

[1]  P. Bourgine,et al.  Topological and causal structure of the yeast transcriptional regulatory network , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[2]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[3]  M. Huynen,et al.  Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  C. Ofria,et al.  Sexual reproduction reshapes the genetic architecture of digital organisms , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Kevin P. White,et al.  A mutation accumulation assay reveals a broad capacity for rapid evolution of gene expression , 2005, Nature.

[6]  J. Drake,et al.  Rates of spontaneous mutation. , 1998, Genetics.

[7]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. , 1999, Science.

[8]  S. Freytag,et al.  Synergistic activation of a human promoter in vivo by transcription factor Sp1 , 1991, Molecular and cellular biology.

[9]  B. Birren,et al.  Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements , 2003, Nature.

[10]  T. Hwa,et al.  Physical constraints and functional characteristics of transcription factor–DNA interaction , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Andy Gardner,et al.  Recombination and the evolution of mutational robustness. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  D. Moerman,et al.  Cis-regulatory Mutations in the Caenorhabditis elegans Homeobox Gene Locus cog-1 Affect Neuronal Development , 2009, Genetics.

[13]  Terence Hwa,et al.  On the Selection and Evolution of Regulatory DNA Motifs , 2001, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[14]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome , 2004, Nature.

[15]  L. Steinmetz,et al.  High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast , 2008, Nature.

[16]  Steven A Frank,et al.  Author ' s personal copy Evolutionary dynamics of redundant regulatory control , 2008 .

[17]  A. Clark,et al.  Evolution of transcription factor binding sites in Mammalian gene regulatory regions: conservation and turnover. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[18]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of genetic redundancy , 1997, Nature.

[19]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Robustness Can Evolve Gradually in Complex Regulatory Gene Networks with Varying Topology , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  M. Lichten,et al.  Mapping Meiotic Single-Strand DNA Reveals a New Landscape of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, PLoS biology.

[21]  T. Storck,et al.  Brachyury proteins regulate target genes through modular binding sites in a cooperative fashion. , 2002, Genes & development.

[22]  L. Meyers,et al.  How Mutational Networks Shape Evolution: Lessons from RNA Models , 2007 .

[23]  Kristen K. Dang,et al.  Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks , 2006, Nature.

[24]  A. Wagner.  Circuit topology and the evolution of robustness in two-gene circadian oscillators. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  M. Levine,et al.  Regulation of a segmentation stripe by overlapping activators and repressors in the Drosophila embryo. , 1991, Science.

[26]  Wolfgang Driever,et al.  Determination of spatial domains of zygotic gene expression in the Drosophila embryo by the affinity of binding sites for the bicoid morphogen , 1989, Nature.

[27]  A. Clark,et al.  Tracing the evolutionary history of Drosophila regulatory regions with models that identify transcription factor binding sites. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[28]  B. Birren,et al.  Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Nature.

[29]  D. S. Fields,et al.  Specificity, free energy and information content in protein-DNA interactions. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[30]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[31]  Allan R. Jones,et al.  Networking the networks , 1995, SIGUCCS '95.

[32]  Scott Doniger,et al.  Frequent Gain and Loss of Functional Transcription Factor Binding Sites , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[33]  J. Thomas,et al.  Thinking about genetic redundancy. , 1993, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[34]  Patrick C Phillips,et al.  The Opportunity for Canalization and the Evolution of Genetic Networks , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[35]  M. Lynch,et al.  The transcriptional consequences of mutation and natural selection in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[36]  Melanie A. Huntley,et al.  Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny , 2007, Nature.

[37]  Mark Gerstein,et al.  Divergence of transcription factor binding sites across related yeast species. , 2007, Science.

[38]  Kerry J. Kim,et al.  Effects of Ploidy and Recombination on Evolution of Robustness in a Model of the Segment Polarity Network , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[39]  A. Wagner.  Distributed robustness versus redundancy as causes of mutational robustness. , 2005, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[40]  Ting Wang,et al.  An improved map of conserved regulatory sites for Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[41]  Daniel E. Newburger,et al.  High-resolution DNA-binding specificity analysis of yeast transcription factors. , 2009, Genome research.

[42]  Christopher L. Warren,et al.  A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[43]  Johannes Berg,et al.  Adaptive evolution of transcription factor binding sites , 2003, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[44]  Cheryl Middleton,et al.  Networking, Networking, Networking , 2006 .

[45]  Naama Barkai,et al.  The design of transcription-factor binding sites is affected by combinatorial regulation , 2005, Genome Biology.

[46]  A. Burt,et al.  Population genomics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus: Quantifying the life cycle , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Peter F Stadler,et al.  A stochastic model for the evolution of transcription factor binding site abundance. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[48]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2002, Nature.

[49]  M. Levine,et al.  Regulation of even‐skipped stripe 2 in the Drosophila embryo. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[50]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against null mutations , 2003, Nature.

[51]  M. Levine,et al.  The eve stripe 2 enhancer employs multiple modes of transcriptional synergy. , 1996, Development.

[52]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Energy constraints on the evolution of gene expression. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[53]  G. Edelman,et al.  Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  J. Stone,et al.  Rapid evolution of cis-regulatory sequences via local point mutations. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[55]  Michael R. Green,et al.  Dissecting the Regulatory Circuitry of a Eukaryotic Genome , 1998, Cell.

[56]  D. Promislow,et al.  Direct Selection on Genetic Robustness Revealed in the Yeast Transcriptome , 2007, PloS one.

[57]  L. Hedges,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .

[58]  M Ptashne,et al.  Cooperative DNA binding of the yeast transcriptional activator GAL4. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  H. Y. Steensma,et al.  Enhanced meiotic recombination on the smallest chromosome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  P. V. von Hippel,et al.  Selection of DNA binding sites by regulatory proteins. Statistical-mechanical theory and application to operators and promoters. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[61]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Redundant Gene Functions and Natural Selection , 1997 .

[62]  B. Pugh,et al.  Identification and Distinct Regulation of Yeast TATA Box-Containing Genes , 2004, Cell.

[63]  Adi Livnat,et al.  A mixability theory for the role of sex in evolution , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  N. Patel,et al.  Functional analysis of eve stripe 2 enhancer evolution in Drosophila: rules governing conservation and change. , 1998, Development.

[65]  E. Marcotte,et al.  An Improved, Bias-Reduced Probabilistic Functional Gene Network of Baker's Yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, PloS one.

[66]  M. Lynch.  The evolution of genetic networks by non-adaptive processes , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[67]  G. Stormo,et al.  Additivity in protein-DNA interactions: how good an approximation is it? , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[68]  J. Derisi,et al.  Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise , 2006, Nature.

[69]  Matthew W. Hahn,et al.  The evolution of transcriptional regulation in eukaryotes. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.