Variable Sequencing Is Actively Maintained in a Well Learned Motor Skill

Variation in sequencing of actions occurs in many natural behaviors, yet how such variation is maintained is poorly understood. We investigated maintenance of sequence variation in adult Bengalese finch song, a learned skill with rendition-to-rendition variation in the sequencing of discrete syllables (i.e., syllable “b” might transition to “c” with 70% probability and to “d” with 30% probability). We found that probabilities of transitions ordinarily remain stable but could be modified by delivering aversive noise bursts following one transition (e.g., “b→c”) but not the alternative (e.g., “b→d”). Such differential reinforcement induced gradual, adaptive decreases in probabilities of targeted transitions and compensatory increases in alternative transitions. Thus, the normal stability of transition probabilities does not reflect hardwired premotor circuitry. While all variable transitions could be modified by differential reinforcement, some were less readily modified than others; these were cases that exhibited more alternation between possible transitions than predicted by chance (i.e., “b→d ” would tend to follow “b→c ” and vice versa). These history-dependent transitions were less modifiable than more stochastic transitions. Similarly, highly stereotyped transitions (which are completely predictable) were not modifiable. This suggests that stochastically generated variability is crucial for sequence modification. Finally, we found that, when reinforcement ceased, birds gradually restored transition probabilities to their baseline values. Hence, the nervous system retains a representation of baseline probabilities and has the impetus to restore them. Together, our results indicate that variable sequencing in a motor skill can reflect an end point of learning that is stably maintained via continual self-monitoring.

[1]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[2]  P. Marler,et al.  Culturally Transmitted Patterns of Vocal Behavior in Sparrows , 1964, Science.

[3]  D. Jin Generating variable birdsong syllable sequences with branching chain networks in avian premotor nucleus HVC. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[5]  E.C.L. Vu,et al.  Identification of a forebrain motor programming network for the learned song of zebra finches , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  Jun Noguchi,et al.  Structural dynamics of dendritic spines in memory and cognition , 2010, Trends in Neurosciences.

[7]  A. Leonardo,et al.  Ensemble Coding of Vocal Control in Birdsong , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Dynamics of the Vocal Imitation Process: How a Zebra Finch Learns Its Song , 2001, Science.

[9]  G. Shepherd,et al.  Transient and Persistent Dendritic Spines in the Neocortex In Vivo , 2005, Neuron.

[10]  Richard Mooney,et al.  Neural mechanisms for learned birdsong. , 2009, Learning & memory.

[11]  Michael S. Brainard,et al.  Learning the microstructure of successful behavior , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Motor sequence learning with the nondominant left hand , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Aaron S. Andalman,et al.  Vocal Experimentation in the Juvenile Songbird Requires a Basal Ganglia Circuit , 2005, PLoS biology.

[14]  Jun Tani,et al.  Developmental learning of complex syntactical song in the Bengalese finch: A neural network model , 2008, Neural Networks.

[15]  Michale S Fee,et al.  A basal ganglia-forebrain circuit in the songbird biases motor output to avoid vocal errors , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  R. Bertram,et al.  Auditory-Dependent Vocal Recovery in Adult Male Zebra Finches Is Facilitated by Lesion of a Forebrain Pathway That Includes the Basal Ganglia , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  K. Okanoya The Bengalese Finch: A Window on the Behavioral Neurobiology of Birdsong Syntax , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[18]  W. A. Wagenaar Generation of random sequences by human subjects: A critical survey of literature. , 1972 .

[19]  Mounya Elhilali,et al.  Monkey Frequency-Modulation Encoding in the Primary Auditory Cortex of the Awake Owl , 2001 .

[20]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  A comparative study of the behavioral deficits following lesions of various parts of the zebra finch song system: implications for vocal learning , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[21]  Masakazu Konishi,et al.  Decrystallization of adult birdsong by perturbation of auditory feedback , 1999, Nature.

[22]  Dai Watanabe,et al.  Neural Coding of Syntactic Structure in Learned Vocalizations in the Songbird , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Andersson,et al.  SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF SONG , 1986 .

[24]  R. Zann The Zebra Finch: A Synthesis of Field and Laboratory Studies , 1996 .

[25]  Richard I. Ivry,et al.  Attention and Structure in Sequence Learning , 2004 .

[26]  K. D. Punta,et al.  An ultra-sparse code underlies the generation of neural sequences in a songbird , 2002 .

[27]  M. Brainard,et al.  Performance variability enables adaptive plasticity of ‘crystallized’ adult birdsong , 2007, Nature.

[28]  Masato Okada,et al.  Complex Sequencing Rules of Birdsong Can be Explained by Simple Hidden Markov Processes , 2010, PloS one.

[29]  T. Hasegawa,et al.  Song preference of female Bengalese finches as measured by operant conditioning , 2010, Journal of Ethology.

[30]  A. Doupe,et al.  Interruption of a basal ganglia–forebrain circuit prevents plasticity of learned vocalizations , 2000, Nature.

[31]  D. A. Humphries,et al.  Erratic Display as a Device against Predators , 1967, Science.

[32]  S. Sober,et al.  Adult birdsong is actively maintained by error correction , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  Richard Hans Robert Hahnloser,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Vocal Sequence Generation in the Songbird , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[34]  R. Sossinka,et al.  Song Types in the Zebra Finch Poephila guttata castanotis1 , 1980 .

[35]  Sarah M. N. Woolley,et al.  Bengalese Finches Lonchura Striata Domestica Depend upon Auditory Feedback for the Maintenance of Adult Song , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Michael S. Brainard,et al.  Central Contributions to Acoustic Variation in Birdsong , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  J. Sakata,et al.  Social modulation of sequence and syllable variability in adult birdsong. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  Louis Lefebvre,et al.  Grooming in crickets: Timing and hierarchical organization , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  E. Nordeen,et al.  Deafening-Induced Vocal Deterioration in Adult Songbirds Is Reversed by Disrupting a Basal Ganglia-Forebrain Circuit , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Age at Deafening Affects the Stability of Learned Song in Adult Male Zebra Finches , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Richard Hans Robert Hahnloser,et al.  An ultra-sparse code underliesthe generation of neural sequences in a songbird , 2002, Nature.

[42]  Kazuo Okanoya,et al.  Song syntax changes in Bengalese finches singing in a helium atmosphere , 2003, Neuroreport.

[43]  Michael S Brainard,et al.  Linked Control of Syllable Sequence and Phonology in Birdsong , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  A. Arnold,et al.  Forebrain lesions disrupt development but not maintenance of song in passerine birds. , 1984, Science.

[45]  A. C. Yu,et al.  Temporal Hierarchical Control of Singing in Birds , 1996, Science.

[46]  M S Brainard,et al.  Postlearning Consolidation of Birdsong: Stabilizing Effects of Age and Anterior Forebrain Lesions , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  P. Marler A comparative approach to vocal learning: Song development in white-crowned sparrows. , 1970 .

[48]  Frank Johnson,et al.  HVC microlesions do not destabilize the vocal patterns of adult male zebra finches with prior ablation of LMAN , 2007, Developmental neurobiology.

[49]  Variability in preference for conspecific songs with syntactical complexity in female Bengalese Finches: towards an understanding of song evolution , 2008 .

[50]  Robin C. Ashmore,et al.  Brainstem and Forebrain Contributions to the Generation of Learned Motor Behaviors for Song , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  H. Williams,et al.  Changes in adult zebra finch song require a forebrain nucleus that is not necessary for song production. , 1999, Journal of neurobiology.

[52]  Michael S Brainard,et al.  An avian basal ganglia-forebrain circuit contributes differentially to syllable versus sequence variability of adult Bengalese finch song. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  B. Schwartz,et al.  Development of complex, stereotyped behavior in pigeons. , 1980, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[54]  Michael S. Brainard,et al.  Covert skill learning in a cortical-basal ganglia circuit , 2012, Nature.

[55]  Michael S Brainard,et al.  Mechanisms and time course of vocal learning and consolidation in the adult songbird. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[56]  Kent C. Berridge,et al.  Comparative Fine Structure of Action: Rules of Form and Sequence in the Grooming Patterns of Six Rodent Species , 1990 .

[57]  Dezhe Z. Jin,et al.  A Compact Statistical Model of the Song Syntax in Bengalese Finch , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[58]  K Okanoya,et al.  Adult Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata var. domestica) require real-time auditory feedback to produce normal song syntax. , 1997, Journal of neurobiology.

[59]  T. Caraco,et al.  RISK AND FORAGING IN STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTS , 1986 .

[60]  Sarah E. Criscimagna-Hemminger,et al.  Consolidation Patterns of Human Motor Memory , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  A. Rapoport,et al.  Randomization in individual choice behavior. , 1997 .

[62]  Allison J Doupe,et al.  Activity in a cortical-basal ganglia circuit for song is required for social context-dependent vocal variability. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[63]  K. Immelmann Song development in the zebra finch and other estrildid finches , 1969 .

[64]  E. Jarvis,et al.  Early onset of deafening‐induced song deterioration and differential requirements of the pallial‐basal ganglia vocal pathway , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[65]  Markus Diesmann,et al.  A reafferent and feed-forward model of song syntax generation in the Bengalese finch , 2011, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[66]  J. Sakata,et al.  Real-Time Contributions of Auditory Feedback to Avian Vocal Motor Control , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.