Attachment Style as a Predictor of Adult Romantic Relationships

Questionnaire measures of attachment style, attachment history, beliefs about relationships, self-esteem, limerence, loving, love addiction, and love styles were administered to 374 undergraduates. Attachment style was related in theoretically expected ways to attachment history and to beliefs about relationships. Securely attached Ss reported relatively positive perceptions of their early family relationships. Avoidant Ss were most likely to report childhood separation from their mother and to express mistrust of others. Anxious-ambivalent subjects were less likely than avoidant Ss to see their father as supportive, and they reported a lack of independence and a desire for deep commitment in relationships. The self-esteem measure and each of the scales measuring forms of love were factor analyzed separately. Analyses based on scale scores derived from the resulting factors indicated that attachment style was also strongly related to self-esteem and to the various forms of love discussed in other theoretical frameworks. The results suggest that attachment theory offers a useful perspective on adult love relationships.

[1]  S. Coopersmith,et al.  The antecedents of self-esteem. , 1969 .

[2]  J. Bowlby.  Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect. , 1969, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[3]  Z. Rubin.  Measurement of romantic love. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  John Bowlby,et al.  Attachment and Loss. Vol. I. Attachment. , 1970 .

[5]  M. Ainsworth,et al.  Infant crying and maternal responsiveness. , 1972, Child development.

[6]  G. W. Rever.  Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1. Attachment , 1972 .

[7]  Z. Rubin.  Liking and Loving: An Invitation to Social Psychology , 1973 .

[8]  A. Brodsky,et al.  Love and Addiction , 1975 .

[9]  Dorothy Tennov,et al.  Love and Limerence: The Experience of Being in Love , 1979 .

[10]  J. Bowlby,et al.  Attachment and Loss. Vol. 3. Loss, Sadness and Depression . By John Bowlby. (Hogarth Press and Institute of Psychoanalysis, 1980.) £12.00. , 1981, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[11]  C. M. Parkes,et al.  The Place of attachment in human behavior , 1982 .

[12]  David Morris,et al.  Attachment and Intimacy , 1982 .

[13]  Susan S. Hendrick,et al.  Do Men and Women Love Differently? , 1984 .

[14]  P. Shaver.  Self, Situations, and Social Behavior , 1985 .

[15]  Smart Women, Foolish Choices , 1986 .

[16]  Susan S. Hendrick,et al.  A theory and method of love. , 1986 .

[17]  B. Thompson,et al.  Concurrent Validity of a Love Relationships Scale , 1987 .

[18]  C. Hazan,et al.  Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Cindy Hazan,et al.  A Biased Overview of the Study of Love , 1988 .

[20]  K. Davis,et al.  Lovestyles and Attachment Styles Compared: Their Relations to Each Other and to Various Relationship Characteristics , 1988 .

[21]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The Psychology of Love , 1988 .

[22]  K. Dion,et al.  Romantic love: Individual and cultural perspectives. , 1988 .

[23]  C. Hazan,et al.  Love as attachment. , 1988 .

[24]  M. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Perspectives on marital interaction , 1988 .

[25]  Susan S. Hendrick,et al.  Research on love: Does it measure up? , 1989 .