Gain and maximum output of two electromagnetic middle ear implants: are real ear measurements helpful?

We compared the output of two electronic middle ear implants: the Otologics MET device and the Vibrant Soundbridge device. Both devices were programmed in the linear amplification mode. Aided minus unaided sound pressure levels recorded in the ear canal (objective gain) were compared to unaided minus aided soundfield thresholds (functional gain) in 13 patients with severe sensorineural hearing loss. In addition, input/output characteristics were studied with the help of ear canal measurements. Objective gain was consistently lower than functional gain, with wide variation between patients and frequencies. Using input/output data measured in the ear canal in combination with functional gain data, the mean maximum output of the two devices was estimated, expressed in dB SPL. In comparison to NAL-R target values, (functional) gain was adequate; however, the maximum output was low, especially for the Vibrant Soundbridge device.

[1]  D. Dirks,et al.  Suggested threshold sound pressure levels for frequency-modulated (warble) tones in the sound field. , 1979, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[2]  P. Newall,et al.  Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing impaired. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[3]  T. G. Dietz,et al.  Partially implantable vibrating ossicular prosthesis , 1997, Proceedings of International Solid State Sensors and Actuators Conference (Transducers '97).

[4]  J van den Heuvel,et al.  Evaluation of fitting rules with a programmable hearing aid. , 1997, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[5]  H Dillon,et al.  The National Acoustic Laboratories' procedure for selecting the saturation sound pressure level of hearing aids: theoretical derivation. , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[6]  Assessment of the vibrant soundbridge auditory prosthesis , 1999 .

[7]  A. Snik,et al.  First audiometric results with the Vibrant soundbridge, a semi-implantable hearing device for sensorineural hearing loss. , 1999, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[8]  Paul Avan,et al.  Intracochlear Acoustic Pressure Measurements: Transfer Functions of the Middle Ear and Cochlear Mechanics , 1999, Audiology and Neurotology.

[9]  L E Humes,et al.  Prescribed clinician-fit versus as-worn coupler gain in a group of elderly hearing-aid wearers. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[10]  C Vincent,et al.  A Multicenter Study of the Vibrant Soundbridge Middle Ear Implant: Early Clinical Results and Experience , 2001, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[11]  John Fredrickson.  The Otologics MET Ossicular Stimulator , 2001 .

[12]  Simon Parisier,et al.  Phase III Clinical Trial Results with the Vibrant Soundbridge Implantable Middle Ear Hearing Device: A Prospective Controlled Multicenter Study , 2002, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[13]  M Winter,et al.  MEASUREMENT METHOD FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF TRANSMISSION PROPERTIES OF IMPLANTABLE HEARING AIDS , 2002, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[14]  LAWRENCE J. REVIT.  Real-Ear Measures , 2003 .