Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Shooting Behavior

Previous research on the relation between working memory capacity (WMC) and shooting behavior suggests that individuals with low working memory spans are more prone to shooting errors than are individuals with high working memory spans. The present study investigated how WMC interacts with the proportion of “shoot” to “don’t shoot” decisions to affect overall shooting performance. Participants were 186 undergraduate students who completed a series of complex span tasks, rated a series of negative photographs for valence and arousal, and then completed a computerized shooting task in which participants were shooting on 20%, 50%, or 80% of the trials. Results indicated that participants with high working memory spans outperformed participants with low working memory spans in all conditions. Participants also exhibited a greater tendency to inappropriately shoot as the proportion of shoot decisions increased. These results suggest that WMC and the proportion of shoot trials interact to affect shooting behavior.

[1]  T. Braver,et al.  Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. , 2007 .

[2]  Thomas S. Redick,et al.  Measuring Working Memory Capacity With Automated Complex Span Tasks , 2012 .

[3]  Randall W Engle,et al.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  C. Judd,et al.  The police officer's dilemma: using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  C. Judd,et al.  Across the thin blue line: police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  D Hemenway,et al.  The US gun stock: results from the 2004 national firearms survey , 2007, Injury Prevention.

[7]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  R. Engle.  Working Memory Capacity as Executive Attention , 2002 .

[9]  R. Engle,et al.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[10]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[11]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  P. Lang.  International affective picture system (IAPS) : affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual , 2005 .

[13]  J. Sinacore.  Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions , 1993 .

[14]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  An automated version of the operation span task , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[15]  Thomas F. Denson,et al.  The turban effect: The influence of Muslim headgear and induced affect on aggressive responses in the shooter bias paradigm , 2008 .

[16]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[17]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  Cognitive Limitations in Aging and Psychopathology: Working Memory Capacity in Hot and Cold Cognition , 2005 .

[18]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  Thomas S. Redick.  Cognitive control in context: working memory capacity and proactive control. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[20]  Heather M. Kleider,et al.  Aggressive shooting behavior: How working memory and threat influence shoot decisions , 2009 .

[21]  Josef C. Schrock,et al.  Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: individual differences in voluntary saccade control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  R. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  E. Vogel,et al.  Working memory and fluid intelligence: Capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval , 2014, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  K. Klein,et al.  The relationship of life event stress and working memory capacity , 2001 .

[25]  Tricia Z. King,et al.  Shooting behaviour: How working memory and negative emotionality influence police officer shoot decisions , 2009 .

[26]  T. Braver.  The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  H Stanislaw,et al.  Calculation of signal detection theory measures , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.