Effects of negation and situational presence on the accessibility of text information.

In 2 experiments, participants read narratives containing a color term that was mentioned either within the scope of an explicit negative or not, and with the described situation being such that the color was either present or not. Accessibility of the color term was measured by means of a probe-recognition task either 500 ms (Experiment 1) or 1,500 ms (Experiment 2) after participants read the sentence mentioning color. After the 500-ms delay, the accessibility of the color term was influenced by the structure of the sentence. After the 1,500-ms delay, the accessibility was influenced by the content of the described situation. These results are consistent with the view that comprehenders construct a linguistic representation of the text as well as a situation model in which only present properties are represented. An alternative account, according to which comprehenders only construct a perceptual simulation of the described situation, is discussed.

[1]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Spatial iconicity affects semantic relatedness judgments , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Verifying Different-Modality Properties for Concepts Produces Switching Costs , 2003, Psychological science.

[3]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Grounding language in action , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Language Comprehenders Mentally Represent the Shapes of Objects , 2002, Psychological science.

[5]  R. B. Lea,et al.  The effect of negation on deductive inferences. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  B. Kaup,et al.  Negation and its impact on the accessibility of text information , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[7]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Representing Properties Locally , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article THE EFFECT OF IMPLIED ORIENTATION DERIVED FROM VERBAL CONTEXT ON PICTURE RECOGNITION , 2022 .

[9]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  The presence of an event in the narrated situation affects its availability to the comprehender , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[10]  A. A. Wijers,et al.  Visual semantic features are activated during the processing of concrete words: event-related potential evidence for perceptual semantic priming. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[11]  Mina Johnson-Glenberg,et al.  Not Propositions , 1999, Cognitive Systems Research.

[12]  C. Habel,et al.  Mental Models in Discourse Processing and Reasoning , 1999 .

[13]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  Christopher Habel,et al.  5 Taking the functional aspect of mental models as a starting point for studying discourse comprehension , 1999 .

[15]  Anthony J. Sanford,et al.  Quantifier Polarity and Referential Focus during Reading , 1998 .

[16]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  N Carriedo,et al.  The role of verb tense and verb aspect in the foregrounding of information during reading , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  GPOWER: A general power analysis program , 1996 .

[19]  K. Paterson,et al.  Attentional focusing with quantifiers in production and comprehension , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Charles R. Fletcher,et al.  Levels of representation in memory for discourse. , 1994 .

[21]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[22]  Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers , 1991 .

[23]  M. Just,et al.  Changes in activation levels with negation. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Time course of priming for associate and inference words in a discourse context , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[25]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension , 1987 .

[26]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Statistical Power Analysis For The Behavioral Sciences Revised Edition , 1987 .

[27]  F. Schmalhofer,et al.  Three components of understanding a programmer's manual: Verbatim, propositional and situational representations , 1986 .

[28]  E. Brütsch.  WAS HEISST HIER NEGATIV? Zur linguistischen Unterscheidung von drei Gegenstandsbereichen der Negativität , 1986 .

[29]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language , 1985 .

[30]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[31]  Anne H. Anderson,et al.  The Accessibility of Pronominal Antecedents as a Function of Episode Shifts in Narrative Text , 1983 .

[32]  R. Langacker.  Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[33]  Talmy Givón,et al.  Negation in Language: Pragmatics, Function, Ontology , 1978 .

[34]  A. Sockloff,et al.  Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences: (revised edition), by Jacob Cohen. New York: Academic Press, 1977, xv + 474 pp., $24.50. , 1978 .

[35]  Mark A. Sherman,et al.  Adjectival Negation and the Comprehension of Multiply Negated Sentences. , 1976 .

[36]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Perceptual coding strategies in the formation and verification of descriptions , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[37]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Drawing inferences from the presuppositions and implications of affirmative and negative sentences , 1973 .

[38]  W G Chase,et al.  Semantics in the perception of verticality. , 1971, British journal of psychology.

[39]  P. Wason.  The contexts of plausible denial , 1965 .