Shape from Shading from Images Rendered with Various Surface Types and Light Fields

Shape constancy is referred to as the tendency for the perceived shape of an object to remain unchanged even under changed viewing and illumination conditions. We investigated, in two experiments, whether shape constancy would hold for images of 3-D solid objects defined by shading only, whose renderings differed in terms of surface material type (bi-directional reflectance distribution functions), light field, light direction, shape, and specularity. Observers were presented with the image of a sphere or an ellipsoid and required to set perceived orientation and cross-section profile on designated points of the image. Results showed that shape judgments varied with all the aforementioned variables except specularity. Shape estimates were more precise with specular than asperity scattering surfaces, collimated than hemispherical diffuse lighting conditions, lower than higher elevations, spherical than ellipsoidal shapes, but not different between surfaces having differing specularity. These results suggest that shape judgments are made largely on the basis of the overall intensity distribution of shading, and that the portions of intensity distribution that are due to nonstructural variables such as surface material type or light field are not excluded in the process of shape estimation, as if being due to structural components. It is concluded that little constancy is expected in the perception of shape from shading.

[1]  H. Barrow,et al.  RECOVERING INTRINSIC SCENE CHARACTERISTICS FROM IMAGES , 1978 .

[2]  B. Wandell,et al.  Asymmetric color matching: how color appearance depends on the illuminant. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[3]  A. Torralba,et al.  Specular reflections and the perception of shape. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[4]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Optical properties (bidirectional reflection distribution functions) of velvet. , 1998, Applied optics.

[5]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  The perception of shading and reflectance , 1996 .

[6]  A Blake,et al.  Shape from specularities: computation and psychophysics. , 1991, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[7]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  Shape From Shading , 2006, Handbook of Mathematical Models in Computer Vision.

[8]  S. Pont,et al.  Material — Illumination Ambiguities and the Perception of Solid Objects , 2006, Perception.

[9]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Does the brain know the physics of specular reflection? , 1990, Nature.

[10]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.

[11]  D. Kersten,et al.  Illumination, Shading and the Perception of Local Orientation , 1996, Vision Research.

[12]  E. Mingolla,et al.  Perception of solid shape from shading , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[13]  L. Arend,et al.  Simultaneous constancy, lightness, and brightness. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  M. Landy,et al.  A Bilinear Model of the Illuminant's Effect on Color Appearance , 1991 .

[15]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Light Source Dependence in Shape from Shading , 1997, Vision Research.

[16]  James T Todd,et al.  Perceptual biases in the interpretation of 3D shape from shading , 2004, Vision Research.

[17]  S. Bergström.  Common and relative components of reflected light as information about the illumination, colour, and three-dimensional form of objects. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[18]  Steven A. Shafer,et al.  Using color to separate reflection components , 1985 .

[19]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Perturbation Study of Shading in Pictures , 1996, Perception.

[20]  William Curran,et al.  Integration of shading and texture cues: Testing the linear model , 1994, Vision Research.

[21]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Perception of local shape from shading , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  The Bas-Relief Ambiguity , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[23]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  Shape-from-shading for matte and glossy objects. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[24]  L. Arend,et al.  Simultaneous color constancy. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[25]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Matching illumination of solid objects , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  William Curran,et al.  The effect of Illuminant position on perceived curvature , 1996, Vision Research.

[27]  M. Braunstein,et al.  Recovering viewer-centered depth from disparity, occlusion, and velocity gradients , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  Chris Christou,et al.  Shape Constancy in Pictorial Relief , 1996, Object Representation in Computer Vision.

[29]  E. Mingolla,et al.  Perception of surface curvature and direction of illumination from patterns of shading. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  F. E. Nicodemus,et al.  Geometrical considerations and nomenclature for reflectance , 1977 .

[31]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Light Source Position in the Perception of Object Shape , 1983, Perception.

[32]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  A Prior for Global Convexity in Local Shape-from-Shading , 2001, Perception.

[33]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Estimating local shape from shading in the presence of global shading , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  Jun'ichiro Seyama,et al.  Shape from shading: estimation of reflectance map , 1998, Vision Research.

[35]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  The secret of velvety skin , 2003, Machine Vision and Applications.