My research objective in this article is to analyze policy change affecting wildfire suppression programs administered by the United States Forest Service and the United States Department of the Interior. Using a variant of the punctuated equilibrium approach, a content analysis of New York Times stories dealing with wildfires over the past two decades was examined in relation to both administrative and legislative policy changes. I conclude by suggesting that administrative shifts were undertaken by federal land administrators in response to crises and media attention to protect decisional autonomy as well as forest resources, while the architect of legislative change was a president taking advantage of the combined effects of increasingly intense wildfire seasons, demographic shifts involving the movement of people and structures to the high-risk wildland urban interface areas, greater media scrutiny, and pressure to act from wildfire weary constituencies. Copyright 2006 by The Policy Studies Organization.
[1]
C. Wise,et al.
Balancing Accountability and Risk in Program Implementation: The Case of National Fire Policy
,
2002
.
[2]
F. Bettley.
Dr G.B. Mitchell-Heggs.
,
1976,
The British journal of dermatology.
[3]
D. McCool.
Subgovernments as Determinants of Political Viability
,
1990
.
[4]
G. Busenberg.
Wildfire Management in the United States: The Evolution of a Policy Failure
,
2004
.
[5]
Charles Davis.
The West in Flames: The Intergovernmental Politics of Wildfire Suppression and Prevention
,
2001
.
[6]
H. Cortner,et al.
Using Parallel Strategies to Promote Change: Forest Policymaking under George W. Bush
,
2004
.
[7]
Bryan D. Jones,et al.
Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems
,
1991,
The Journal of Politics.
[8]
Earl W. Loveridge.
The Fire Suppression Policy of the U. S. Forest Service
,
1944
.