Design and analysis of apposition compound eye optical sensors

Methods are presented for designing and estimating the performance of artificial apposition compound eye optical sensors. Apposition compound eyes have been investigated for a wide range of applications from robotics to smart weapons. While artificial apposition compound eyes have been constructed and demonstrated, optical design issues and performance prediction for these systems have never been adequately addressed in the literature. Apposition compound eyes are a useful paradigm for applications where wide field of view is critical but high spatial resolution is not required. Natural arthropod compound eyes and their biological models are first scrutinized to give insight into designing and modeling artificial apposition compound eye optical sensors. Such sensors are shown to have comparable sensitivity to traditional single-aperture sensors for extended sources. A method for enhancing resolution over the extended-source case is demonstrated for single point sources. For the first time, the frequency response of an artificial apposition compound eye is addressed while taking into account the differences between artificial and natural ommatidia. Both a numercal integration technique for determining the contrast transfer function and a Fourier-transform modulation-transfer-function method are presented and validated with experimental results.

[1]  A W Synder,et al.  Light absorption in the bee photoreceptor. , 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[2]  T E Sherk,et al.  Development of the compound eyes of dragonflies (Odonata). IV. Development of the adult compound eyes. , 1978, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[3]  M. F. Land,et al.  Observations on the Compound Eyes of the Deep-Sea Ostracod Macrocypridina Castanea , 1990 .

[4]  D. Nilsson,et al.  Regionally different optical systems in the compound eye of the water-flea Polyphemus (Cladocera, Crustacea) , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[5]  Colin Pask,et al.  Evidence for a new optical element in insect visual systems , 1989 .

[6]  N. Franceschini,et al.  From insect vision to robot vision , 1992 .

[7]  G. Horridge The compound eye of insects , 1977 .

[8]  G. Horridge The Compound eye and vision of insects , 1975 .

[9]  G. Horridge Review lecture: Apposition eyes of large diurnal insects as organs adapted to seeing , 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[10]  David A. Ritz Polarised light responses in the shrimp Palaemonetes vulgaris (Say) , 1991 .

[11]  D. Nilsson,et al.  A Pronounced Fovea in the Eye of a Water Flea, Revealed by Stereographic Mapping of Ommatidial Axes , 1982 .

[12]  W. H. Miller,et al.  Comparative Physiology and Evolution of Vision in Invertebrates , 2011, Handbook of Sensory Physiology.

[13]  Simon B. Laughlin,et al.  Comparative Physiology and Evolution of Vision in Invertebrates , 1981 .

[14]  Kuno Kirschfeld,et al.  The Absolute Sensitivity of Lens and Compound Eyes , 1974, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences.

[15]  M. Land,et al.  Compound eyes: old and new optical mechanisms , 1980, Nature.

[16]  A. Snyder,et al.  Light absorption in visual photoreceptors. , 1974, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[17]  M. F. Land,et al.  Afocal apposition optics in butterfly eyes , 1984, Nature.

[18]  George Adrian Horridge,et al.  The dorsal eye of the mayfly Atalophlebia (Ephemeroptera) , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.