A General Approach for Simulating Rain Effects on Sensor Data in Real and Virtual Environments

Driving automation systems typically use surround sensors to perceive their local environment. Accidents with automated vehicles have shown that errors in sensor data measurement and interpretation can lead to fatal injuries. It is thus necessary to test the reliability of environmental perception systems before market introduction. Since critical weather conditions are random, rare, and change quickly, relevant data sets are biased towards clear conditions. Consequently, detection algorithms based on these data suffer from limited performance. This article focuses on a two-step approach based on a) an indoor rain facility to test under reproducible, realistic conditions and b) physical-based models to enrich sensor data from clear conditions with virtual rain effects in a post-processing step. We concentrate on data from camera, lidar, and radar sensors. Experimental results show that both approaches simulate critical effects on raw sensor data and, therefore, enable replicable testing and validation at every stage of development.

[1]  L. Ippolito,et al.  Radio propagation for space communications systems , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  Andreas Geiger,et al.  Video-based raindrop detection for improved image registration , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, ICCV Workshops.

[3]  D. J. Segelstein The complex refractive index of water , 1981 .

[4]  Alexis Berne,et al.  Correction of raindrop size distributions measured by Parsivel disdrometers, using a two-dimensional video disdrometer as a reference , 2014 .

[5]  Ali Farhadi,et al.  YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement , 2018, ArXiv.

[6]  Xu Yang,et al.  Real-time rendering of realistic rain , 2006, SIGGRAPH '06.

[7]  Thomas Brandmeier,et al.  Test methodology for rain influence on automotive surround sensors , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[8]  Robby T. Tan,et al.  Visibility in bad weather from a single image , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[9]  Roman Kuchkuda,et al.  An introduction to ray tracing , 1993, Comput. Graph..

[10]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  L. D. Meyer,et al.  Simulation of Rainfall for Soil Erosion Research , 1965 .

[12]  G. Mie Beiträge zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metallösungen , 1908 .

[13]  Andreas Riener,et al.  Introduction to rain and fog attenuation on automotive surround sensors , 2017, 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[14]  Andreas Riener,et al.  A Model-Based Approach to Simulate Rain Effects on Automotive Surround Sensor Data , 2018, 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[15]  Kanjar De,et al.  Image Sharpness Measure for Blurred Images in Frequency Domain , 2013 .

[16]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Photorealistic rendering of rain streaks , 2006, SIGGRAPH '06.

[17]  Werner Ritter,et al.  A Benchmark for Lidar Sensors in Fog: Is Detection Breaking Down? , 2018, 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[18]  Alexander Yarovoy,et al.  Analysis of rain clutter detections in commercial 77 GHz automotive radar , 2017, 2017 European Radar Conference (EURAD).

[19]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  When does a camera see rain? , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[20]  Wilhelm Stork,et al.  Weather Influence and Classification with Automotive Lidar Sensors , 2019, 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[21]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  Simulation of Radar Reflectivity and Surface Measurements of Rainfall , 1987 .

[22]  Klaus C. J. Dietmayer,et al.  Seeing Through Fog Without Seeing Fog: Deep Sensor Fusion in the Absence of Labeled Training Data , 2019, ArXiv.

[23]  G. C. S.,et al.  Beiträge zur Physik der freien Atmosphäre , 1905, Nature.

[24]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Vision and Rain , 2006 .

[25]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Simulation of falling rain for robustness testing of video-based surround sensing systems , 2016, 2016 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE).

[26]  Frédéric Chausse,et al.  Methodology Used to Evaluate Computer Vision Algorithms in Adverse Weather Conditions , 2016 .

[27]  Tat Soon Yeo,et al.  On the simplified expression of realistic raindrop shapes , 1994 .

[28]  Philip Laven,et al.  Simulation of rainbows, coronas, and glories by use of Mie theory. , 2003, Applied optics.

[29]  M. Werman,et al.  Simulation of Rain in Videos , 2002 .

[30]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Detection and removal of rain from videos , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004..

[31]  Dominique Gruyer,et al.  Modeling and validation of a new generic virtual optical sensor for ADAS prototyping , 2012, 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[32]  Alebel Arage Hassen Indicators for the Signal Degradation and Optimization of Automotive Radar Sensors Under Adverse Weather Conditions , 2007 .

[33]  C. Tropea,et al.  Light Scattering from Small Particles , 2003 .

[34]  Ralph Helmar Rasshofer,et al.  Influences of weather phenomena on automotive laser radar systems , 2011 .

[35]  K. Nishikawa,et al.  Radar cross section for pedestrian in 76GHz band , 2005, 2005 European Microwave Conference.

[36]  Santiago Beguería,et al.  Comparison of precipitation measurements by OTT Parsivel 2 and Thies LPM optical disdrometers , 2017 .

[37]  Carlton W. Ulbrich,et al.  Path- and Area-Integrated Rainfall Measurement by Microwave Attenuation in the 1–3 cm Band , 1977 .

[38]  Werner Ritter,et al.  Benchmarking Image Sensors Under Adverse Weather Conditions for Autonomous Driving , 2018, 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[39]  Ralph R. Martin,et al.  Noise in 3D laser range scanner data , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications.

[40]  A. Yarovoy,et al.  The influence of the water-covered dielectric radome on 77GHz automotive radar signals , 2017, 2017 European Radar Conference (EURAD).

[41]  Christopher R. Hudson,et al.  Predicting the Influence of Rain on LIDAR in ADAS , 2019, Electronics.

[42]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  The Earth Mover's Distance as a Metric for Image Retrieval , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[43]  Bruce A. Wallace,et al.  Merging and transformation of raster images for cartoon animation , 1981, SIGGRAPH '81.

[44]  Rolf Jakoby,et al.  Effects of Water and Ice Layer on Automotive Radar , 2006 .

[45]  G. Feingold,et al.  The Lognormal Fit to Raindrop Spectra from Frontal Convective Clouds in Israel , 1986 .

[46]  H. González-Jorge,et al.  Quantifying the influence of rain in LiDAR performance , 2017 .

[47]  Zygmunt Mierczyk,et al.  Comparison of 905 nm and 1550 nm semiconductor laser rangefinders’ performance deterioration due to adverse environmental conditions , 2014 .

[48]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Photometric Model of a Rain Drop , 2003 .

[49]  Andreas Riener,et al.  Reproducible Fog Simulation for Testing Automotive Surround Sensors , 2017, 2017 IEEE 85th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).