Global warming: Forecasts by scientists versus scientific forecasts

In 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Working Group One, a panel of experts established by the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environment Programme, issued its Fourth Assessment Report. The Report included predictions of dramatic increases in average world temperatures over the next 92 years and serious harm resulting from the predicted temperature increases. Using forecasting principles as our guide we asked: Are these forecasts a good basis for developing public policy? Our answer is “no.” To provide forecasts of climate change that are useful for policy-making, one would need to forecast (1) global temperature, (2) the effects of any temperature changes, (3) the effects of alternative policies, and (4) whether the best policy would be successfully implemented. Proper forecasts of all four are necessary for rational policy making. The IPCC Report was regarded as providing the most credible long-term forecasts of global average temperatures by 31 of the 51 scientists and others involved in forecasting climate change who responded to our survey. We found no references to the primary sources of information on forecasting methods despite the fact these are easily available in books, articles, and websites. We audited the forecasting processes described in Chapter 8 of the IPCC’s WG1 Report to assess the extent to which they complied with forecasting principles. We found enough information to make judgments on 89 out of a total of 140 forecasting principles. The forecasting procedures that were described violated 72 principles. Many of the violations were, by themselves, critical. were the opinions of scientists transformed by mathematics and obscured by complex writing. Research on forecasting has shown that experts’ predictions are not useful. We have been unable to identify any scientific forecasts of global warming. Claims that the Earth will get warmer have no more credence than saying that it will get colder.

[1]  V. Lakshmi Useless Arithmetic: Why Environmental Scientists Can't Predict the Future , 2007 .

[2]  J. Barrett,et al.  Climate stability: an inconvenient proof , 2007 .

[3]  Bjarne Andresen,et al.  Does a Global Temperature Exist? , 2007 .

[4]  Henrik Svensmark,et al.  Cosmoclimatology: a new theory emerges , 2007 .

[5]  N. Stern The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[6]  R. M. Carter The Myth of Dangerous Human-Caused Climate Change , 2007 .

[7]  D. Randall,et al.  Climate models and their evaluation , 2007 .

[8]  CO 2 : The Greatest Scientific Scandal of Our Time , 2007 .

[9]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[10]  G. Hegerl,et al.  Understanding and Attributing Climate Change , 2007 .

[11]  S. Huffmon Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? , 2006 .

[12]  David Holland,et al.  The Stern Review: A Dual Critique , 2006 .

[13]  J. Armstrong,et al.  Findings from Evidence-Based Forecasting: Methods for Reducing Forecast Error , 2006 .

[14]  Al Vizard,et al.  Verification and value of the Australian Bureau of Meteorology township seasonal rainfall forecasts in Australia, 1997–2005 , 2005 .

[15]  W. Soon Variable solar irradiance as a plausible agent for multidecadal variations in the Arctic‐wide surface air temperature record of the past 130 years , 2005 .

[16]  Leonard A. Smith,et al.  Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases , 2005, Nature.

[17]  R. Keeney WRITTEN TESTIMONY OF , 2005 .

[18]  Christopher Essex,et al.  Taken By Storm: The Troubled Science, Policy and Politics of Global Warming , 2003 .

[19]  Jonathan G. Koomey,et al.  WHAT CAN HISTORY TEACH US? A Retrospective Examination of Long-Term Energy Forecasts for the United States* , 2002 .

[20]  P. Stott,et al.  Origins and estimates of uncertainty in predictions of twenty-first century temperature rise , 2002, Nature.

[21]  Dick R. Wittink,et al.  Forecasting with Conjoint Analysis , 2001 .

[22]  George T. Duncan,et al.  Forecasting Analogous Time Series , 2001 .

[23]  John C. Davis,et al.  AAPG Studies in Geology 47: Geological Perspectives of Global Climate Change, Chapter 11 - The Search for Patterns in Ice-Core Temperature Curves , 2000 .

[24]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Forecasting for Environmental Decision Making , 2001 .

[25]  J. Armstrong,et al.  Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation , 1997 .

[26]  Robert Finn,et al.  [When the experts speak]. , 1994, Revue de l'infirmiere.

[27]  Steven P. Schnaars,et al.  Extrapolation models on very short-term forecasts , 1986 .

[28]  Michael H. Glantz,et al.  Expert judgment and climate forecasting: A methodological critique of “climate change to the year 2000” , 1985 .

[29]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Technical analysis of IIASA energy scenarios , 1984, Nature.

[30]  J. Armstrong,et al.  The Seer-Sucker Theory: The Value of Experts in Forecasting , 2005 .

[31]  R. L. Henshel,et al.  Forecasting: An Appraisal for Policy-Makers and Planners. , 1978 .