Construct validity of eight tests of attention : comparison of normal and closed head injured samples

Abstract Attentional problems are common symptoms of brain impairment and are generally assessed by a number of psychological tests. However, clinicians do not always agree on the processes measured by these tests and validation of the tests is often inadequate. The present study used factor-analytic techniques to examine the construct validity of eight attention tests (Letter Cancellation, Serial Subtraction, Digit Span, Digit Symbol, Stroop Colour-Word, Trail Making, Symbol Digit Modality, and Knox Cube). These tests were administered to 125 university controls, 45 normal controls from the community, and 37 closed-head-injured patients. Each of the 13 measures from the eight tests were found to load on one of three components/factors (identified as visuo-motor scanning, sustained selective processing, and visual/auditory spanning) for the normal as well as the patient group. Comparison of the mean performances of the patients and their matched controls suggested that: (a) severe short-term patients were...

[1]  P. Kroonenberg,et al.  Cross-Validation of the WISC-R Factorial Structure Using Three-mode Principal Components Analysis and Perfect Congruence Analysis , 1987 .

[2]  R C Erickson,et al.  Cognitive deficits among functionally psychotic patients: a rehabilitative perspective. , 1986, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology.

[3]  C. Golden Clinical interpretation of objective psychological tests , 1979 .

[4]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Effects of closed-head injury on attentional processes: an information-processing stage analysis. , 1990, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[5]  R. Bornstein Construct validity of the Knox Cube Test as a neuropsychological measure. , 1983, Journal of clinical neuropsychology.

[6]  Robert L. Rodnitzky,et al.  Neurobehavioral Consequences of Closed Head Injury , 1982 .

[7]  C. Golden Diagnosis and Rehabilitation in Clinical Neuropsychology , 1981 .

[8]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Neurobehavioral recovery from head injury. , 1987 .

[9]  D. Gronwall,et al.  The psychological effects of concussion , 1974 .

[10]  A. Wyler,et al.  The behavioral sequelae of head injury. , 1983, Journal of clinical neuropsychology.

[11]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[12]  G. Arthur A point scale of performance tests , 1936 .

[13]  Cyril Burt,et al.  THE FACTORIAL STUDY OF TEMPERAMENTAL TRAITS , 1948 .

[14]  P. Nichelli,et al.  Neuropsychological evaluation of mild head injury. , 1985, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[15]  I. L. Zimmerman,et al.  Clinical Interpretation of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale , 1975 .

[16]  B. Jennett,et al.  Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. , 1974, Lancet.

[17]  K. Jöreskog,et al.  Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood and least squares methods , 1983 .

[18]  M. J. Noruésis,et al.  SPSS-X advanced statistics guide , 1985 .

[19]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  A first course in factor analysis , 1973 .

[20]  Jmf Tenberge,et al.  ROTATION TO PERFECT CONGRUENCE AND THE CROSS-VALIDATION OF COMPONENT WEIGHTS ACROSS POPULATIONS , 1986 .

[21]  Jmf Tenberge,et al.  SOME RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DESCRIPTIVE COMPARISONS OF COMPONENTS FROM DIFFERENT STUDIES , 1986 .