Regional earthquake loss estimation : role of transportation network, sensitivity and uncertainty, and risk mitigation

Large earthquakes near densely populated areas such as the 1994 Northridge and 1995 Kobe events have caused extensive damage to the physical infrastructure and losses to the regional and national economies. Economic losses are due in part to direct damage and in part to business interruption caused by nonfunctioning infrastructure and interdependencies among industrial sectors. We developed a regional earthquake loss methodology that emphasizes economic interdependencies at regional and national scales and the mediating role of the transportation network. In an application to the Central U.S. under threat from earthquakes from the New Madrid Seismic Zone, we (1) evaluate regional and national losses from scenario earthquakes, (2) quantify uncertainty on the losses through loss risk curves including contributions from seismicity, attenuation, fragilities, etc. and (3) assess the effectiveness of alternative mitigation strategies. The loss assessment methodology includes spatial interactions (through the transportation network) and business interaction (through an input-output model) and extends geographically to the entire conterminous U.S. The losses reflect damage to buildings and transportation components, reduced functionality, changes in the level of economic activity in different economic sectors and geographical regions, and the speed of the reconstruction/recovery process. Evaluation of losses for a number of scenario earthquakes indicates that losses from business interruption may be as significant as infrastructure repair costs. The overall loss is also contributed by the increase in transportation costs due to network damage. As part of the uncertainty evaluation, we assess the sensitivity of earthquake losses to various component models and model parameters. Using a detailed model of regional seismicity, scenario earthquake building losses, and a relation between business losses and building losses, we develop risk curves for building losses, business losses, and total economic losses. The results underline the importance of considering uncertainty in risk assessment. Finally, we investigate the effectiveness of alternative loss mitigation strategies such as retrofitting of buildings or bridges and faster recovery of functionality for various occupancy classes or bridges. For a number of cases, we develop loss risk curves for mitigated conditions and calculate expected annual losses, which might be used for rational decision making e.g. through cost-benefit comparison. Thesis Supervisor: Daniele Veneziano Title: Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering

[1]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Advances in Earthquake Loss Estimation and Application to Memphis, Tennessee , 1997 .

[2]  Marco Pagani,et al.  Regional and local seismic hazard assessment , 2001 .

[3]  Stephanie E. Chang,et al.  Probabilistic Earthquake Scenarios: Extending Risk Analysis Methodologies to Spatially Distributed Systems , 2000 .

[4]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  PROS AND CONS OF A PUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION , 1998 .

[5]  D. Wells,et al.  New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[6]  Stephanie E. Chang,et al.  Direct and Indirect Economic Losses from Earthquake Damage , 1997 .

[7]  Howard H. M. Hwang,et al.  Evaluation of Seismic Damage to Memphis Bridges and Highway Systems , 2000 .

[8]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Some Comparisons Between Recent Ground- Motion Relations , 1997 .

[9]  T. J. Kim,et al.  Economic impacts of transportation network changes: Implementation of a combined transportation network and input-output model , 2002 .

[10]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Ground-motion relations for eastern North America , 1995, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[11]  Howard H. M. Hwang,et al.  Site coefficients for design of buildings in eastern United States , 1997 .

[12]  Charles A. Kircher,et al.  Estimation of Earthquake Losses to Buildings , 1997 .

[13]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Evaluation of models for earthquake source spectra in eastern North America , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[14]  Sumit Mathew Kunnumkal Multi-resolution analysis of earthquake losses : from city block to national scale , 2002 .

[15]  R. Mcguire Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis , 2004 .

[16]  Charles A. Kircher,et al.  Development of Building Damage Functions for Earthquake Loss Estimation , 1997 .

[17]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Integrating Transportation Network and Regional Economic Models to Estimate the Costs of a Large Urban Earthquake , 2001 .

[18]  Stephanie E. Chang,et al.  Measuring post-disaster transportation system performance: the 1995 Kobe earthquake in comparative perspective , 2001 .

[19]  David E. Boyce,et al.  Solution Algorithm for Combined Interregional Commodity Flow and Transportation Network Model with Link Capacity Constraints , 2001 .

[20]  Thalia Anagnos,et al.  Development of a National Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology , 1997 .

[21]  James E. Moore,et al.  Analyzing Transportation Reconstruction Network Strategies: A Full Cost Approach , 2000 .

[22]  James L. Beck,et al.  Sensitivity of Building Loss Estimates to Major Uncertain Variables , 2002 .

[23]  James E. Moore,et al.  A RISK-BASED METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING THE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF HIGHWAY SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[24]  Raymond B. Seed,et al.  New Site Coefficients and Site Classification System Used in Recent Building Seismic Code Provisions , 2000 .

[25]  Ahmed Ghobarah,et al.  Seismic assessment of existing RC structures , 2000 .

[26]  1 Earthquake Risk Reduction 1 . 1 , 2022 .

[27]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Geotechnical Aspects of Seismic Hazards , 2004 .

[28]  R. P. Kennedy,et al.  AVAILABILITY NOTICE Availability of Reference Materials Cited in NRC Publications , 1986 .

[29]  Patricia Grossi Quantifying the uncertainty in seismic risk and loss estimation , 2000 .

[30]  Jiemin Guo,et al.  Benchmark Input-Output Accounts of the United States, 1997 , 2002 .

[31]  Edward Huntington Cobb,et al.  Geological Survey open-file reports of Alaska indexed by quadrangle , 1974 .

[32]  Anne S. Kiremidjian,et al.  Assembly-Based Vulnerability of Buildings and Its Use in Performance Evaluation , 2001 .

[33]  Anne S. Kiremidjian,et al.  Earthquake Damage and Loss Estimation Methodology and Data for Salt Lake County, Utah (ATC-36) , 1997 .

[34]  David M. Boore,et al.  Estimation of ground motion at deep-soil sites in eastern North America , 1991, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[35]  R. L. Wesson,et al.  USGS National Seismic Hazard Maps , 2000 .