The shovel-shaped teeth were analysed morphologically in 560 plaster casts of upper and lower jaws obtained from Japanese in Chubu District, and results summarized as follows :(1) The incidence of shovel-shaped incisors and canines is shown in Table 1. It is somewhat lower among Japanese than among other Mongoloids, the Japanese forming a subdivision, different at least from that of Indians or Eskimos, within a division of Mongoloids.(2) A close, parallel relationship exists between the degree of development of the shovel-shaped front teeth and that of the marginal ridge on the labial and lingual surface of upper and lower canines or that of the double-shoveled incisors.(3) A close negative relationship is present between the degree of development of the shovel-shaped canines and that of their lingual central ridge. Similar relationship is also observed between the lingual central ridge of upper canines and shovel-shaped lower incisor.(4) On the basis of the preceding evidences, it is concluded that the incidence of shovel-shape is generally high in teeth bearing remarkable developed marginal ridge and slightly developed central ridge, and vice versa.(5) A parallel relationship exists between the degree of development of shovel-shaped incisors and that of lingual tubercle, but no significant relation is observed between the two in canines.(6) Mesio-distal diameter of the crown of incisors is distinctly larger in more developed shovel-shaped incisors, both upper and lower. No significant difference is observed between the two in canines.(7) Shovel-shape of front teeth is not an independent characteristics but final phenotype caused by the relative or absolute degree of development or the morphological variation of many characteristics present in the lingual surface of front teeth.
[1]
R. Snyder,et al.
Mesial Margin Ridging of Incisor Labial Surfaces
,
1960,
Journal of dental research.
[2]
A. Riesenfeld.
Shovel-shaped incisors and a few other dental features among the native peoples of the Pacific.
,
1956,
American journal of physical anthropology.
[3]
J. Robinson.
The dentition of the Australopithecinae
,
1956
.
[4]
Tratman Ek.
A comparison of the teeth of people; Indo-European racial stock with the Mongoloid racial stock.
,
1950
.
[5]
G. Lasker.
Genetic analysis of racial traits of the teeth.
,
1950,
Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.
[6]
A. Dahlberg,et al.
The shovel-shaped character in the teeth of the Pima Indians.
,
1947,
American Journal of Physical Anthropology.
[7]
G. Lasker.
Observations on the teeth of Chinese born and reared in China and America
,
1945
.
[8]
S. Rabkin.
Dental Conditions Among Prehistoric Indians of Kentucky
,
1943
.
[9]
P. H. Stevenson.
Detailed anthropometric measurements of the chinese of the North China Plain
,
1938
.
[10]
C. Nelson.
The teeth of the Indians of Pecos Pueblo
,
1938
.
[11]
F. Weidenreich.
The dentition of Sinanthropus Pekinensis : a comparative odontography of the hominids
,
1937
.
[12]
A. Hrdlička.
Anthropology of the Sioux
,
1931
.
[13]
Middleton J. C. Shaw,et al.
The teeth, the bony palate and the mandible in Bantu races of South Africa
,
1931
.
[14]
E. Hooton,et al.
The Indians of Pecos pueblo : a study of their skeletal remains
,
1930
.
[15]
A. Hrdlička.
Further studies of tooth morphology
,
1921
.
[16]
A. Hrdlička.
Shovel Shaped Teeth
,
1920
.