Environmental policy and international trade when governments and producers act strategically

Some environmentalists express concern that trade liberalization may damage the environment by giving governments incentives to relax environmental policies to give domestic producers a competitive advantage. Support for such concern may be given by models of imperfectly competitive trade where there may be “rent-shifting” incentives for governments to relax environmental policies. But there are also incentives for producers to act strategically, e.g., through their investment in RD (ii) allowing governments to act strategically increases the incentive for producers to act strategically; (iii) welfare is lower when both parties act strategically; and (iv) strategic behavior by producers and governments is greater when governments use emission taxes than when they use emission standards.

[1]  R. Engle,et al.  Testing superexogeneity and invariance in regression models , 1993 .

[2]  Michael P. Clements,et al.  Can Econometrics Improve Economic Forecasting , 1994 .

[3]  James Davidson,et al.  Econometric Modelling of the Aggregate Time-Series Relationship Between Consumers' Expenditure and Income in the United Kingdom , 1978 .

[4]  M. Rauscher On ecological dumping , 1994 .

[5]  Bruce E. Hansen,et al.  Testing for parameter instability in linear models , 1992 .

[6]  J. Muellbauer THE ASSESSMENT: CONSUMER EXPENDITURE , 1994 .

[7]  Michael P. Clements,et al.  An empirical study of seasonal unit roots in forecasting , 1997 .

[8]  David F. Hendry,et al.  Co-Integration, Error Correction, and the Econometric Analysis of Non-Stationary Data , 1993, Advanced texts in econometrics.

[9]  Peter W. Kennedy,et al.  Equilibrium Pollution Taxes in Open Economies with Imperfect Competition , 1994 .

[10]  L. Godfrey,et al.  REGRESSION EQUATIONS WHEN THE REGRESSORS INCLUDE LAGGED DEPENDENT VARIABLES , 1978 .

[11]  Andrew Harvey,et al.  Seasonality in dynamic regression models , 1994 .

[12]  Preston J. Miller Forecasting with Econometric Methods: A Comment , 1978 .

[13]  N. Edward Coulson,et al.  Forecast combination in a dynamic setting , 1993 .

[14]  Jurgen A. Doornik,et al.  The Implications for Econometric Modelling of Forecast Failure , 1997 .

[15]  Environmental Policy When Market Structure and Plant Locations are Endo-genous , 1990 .

[16]  Comments on the evaluation of policy models , 1991 .

[17]  Francis X. Diebold,et al.  Forecast combination and encompassing: Reconciling two divergent literatures , 1989 .

[18]  J. Brander,et al.  Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry , 1984 .

[19]  Neil R. Ericsson,et al.  The Lucas critique in practice: theory without measurement , 1995 .

[20]  A Seasonal Model of Consumption , 1989 .

[21]  S. Johansen Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models , 1996 .

[22]  R. Lucas Econometric policy evaluation: A critique , 1976 .

[23]  Scott Barrett,et al.  Strategic environmental policy and intrenational trade , 1994 .

[24]  S. Johansen STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF COINTEGRATION VECTORS , 1988 .

[25]  Klaus Conrad,et al.  Taxes and subsidies for pollution-intensive industries as trade policy , 1993 .

[26]  D. Hendry,et al.  Testing the lucas critique: A review , 1992 .