Performance comparison of centroiding algorithms for laser guide star wavefront sensing with extremely large telescopes

Sodium laser guide stars (LGSs) increase the sky coverage of adaptive optics systems but have their own limitations. For Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensors (WFSs), the slow variations of the sodium layer altitude and atom density profile induce changing errors on centroid measurements, especially for extremely large telescopes (ELTs), as the spot elongation increases with the telescope diameter. These LGS-induced aberrations are propagated on the science path and must be filtered out by (i) optimizing the LGS WFS and the centroiding algorithm and (ii) adding a high-pass filter on the LGS path and a low-bandwidth natural-guide-star (NGS) WFS. Within the context of the European Southern Observatory European-ELT project, five different centroiding algorithms, namely, the center-of-gravity (CoG), weighted CoG, matched filter, quad cell, and correlation, have been evaluated in a closed loop on the University of Victoria LGS wavefront sensing test bed. This optical bench reproduces, in the laboratory, both NGS spots and LGS elongated spots with changing sodium profiles and turbulence. Each centroiding algorithm performance is compared and discussed for a central- versus side-launch laser: different fields of view, pixel sampling, and signal-to-noise ratios.

[1]  R. Noll Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence , 1976 .

[2]  Paul Hickson,et al.  A large‐aperture sodium fluorescence lidar with very high resolution for mesopause dynamics and adaptive optics studies , 2009 .

[3]  G Rousset,et al.  Improvement of Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensor measurement for extreme adaptive optics. , 2004, Optics letters.

[4]  B L Ellerbroek,et al.  Constrained matched filtering for extended dynamic range and improved noise rejection for Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing. , 2008, Optics letters.

[5]  Lisa A Poyneer,et al.  Scene-based Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensing: analysis and simulation. , 2003, Applied optics.

[6]  Paul Hickson,et al.  Temporal variability of the telluric sodium layer. , 2006, Optics letters.

[7]  Douglas M. Summers,et al.  The W. M. Keck Observatory Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics System: Overview , 2006 .

[8]  Gerard Rousset,et al.  Comparison of centroid computation algorithms in a Shack–Hartmann sensor , 2006 .

[9]  Jerry Nelson,et al.  The status of the Thirty Meter Telescope project , 2008, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[10]  Colin Bradley,et al.  Radial thresholding to mitigate laser guide star aberrations on centre-of-gravity-based Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensors , 2009 .

[11]  Eric Gendron,et al.  Method for simulating infinitely long and non stationary phase screens with optimized memory storage. , 2006, Optics express.

[12]  Colin Bradley,et al.  Experimental assessment of the matched filter for laser guide star wavefront sensing. , 2009, Applied optics.

[13]  Antonin Bouchez,et al.  Quasi-static aberrations induced by laser guide stars in adaptive optics. , 2006 .

[14]  T. Fusco,et al.  Study of optimal wavefront sensing with elongated laser guide stars , 2008 .

[15]  Jean-Pierre Véran,et al.  Focus errors from tracking sodium layer altitude variations with laser guide star adaptive optics for the Thirty Meter Telescope , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[16]  Roberto Gilmozzi,et al.  The 42m European ELT: status , 2008, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[17]  Colin Bradley,et al.  A laser guide star wavefront sensor bench demonstrator for TMT. , 2008, Optics express.

[18]  Richard M Clare,et al.  Modeling low order aberrations in laser guide star adaptive optics systems. , 2007, Optics express.