Cross section measurements of proton capture reactions on Sr isotopes for astrophysics applications

Background: Abundance calculations of a certain class of proton-rich isotopes, known as $p$ nuclei, require knowledge of the cross sections of thousands of nuclear reactions entering a reaction network. As a result, the solution of the latter relies on the predictions of the Hauser-Feshbach (HF) theory and, hence, on the reliability of the models describing the nuclear parameters entering the HF calculations, notably the optical model potential (OMP), the nuclear level density (NLD) and the $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray strength function ($\ensuremath{\gamma}\mathrm{SF}$).Purpose: The present work reports on a systematic study of proton capture reactions on Sr isotopes at energies relevant to the $p$ process which is responsible for the production of the $p$ nuclei at explosive stellar sites. The purpose of the work reported here is to perform a validity test of the different OMP, NLD, and $\ensuremath{\gamma}\mathrm{SF}$ models through extensive and detailed comparisons between HF calculations and experimental cross section data. This test is necessary to understand the origin of discrepancies between the $p$-nuclei abundances observed in the solar system and those predicted by the different astrophysical models, known as $p$-process models, aiming at describing the nucleosynthesis of the $p$ isotopes.Method: Cross sections were determined from $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-angular distribution measurements and from angle-integrated $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ spectra taken with the $4\ensuremath{\pi}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\gamma}$-summing technique. Cross-section data and the resulting astrophysical $S$ factors were compared with Hauser-Feshbach calculations obtained with the latest version 1.95 of the nuclear reaction code talys using combinations of global semi-microscopic and phenomenological models of optical potentials (OMPs), nuclear level densities (NLDs), and $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray strength functions ($\ensuremath{\gamma}\mathrm{SFs}$).Results: Total cross sections as well as cross sections to the ground and metastable states were determined for the reactions $^{86}\mathrm{Sr}(p,\ensuremath{\gamma})^{87}\mathrm{Y}$, $^{87}\mathrm{Sr}(p,\ensuremath{\gamma})^{88}\mathrm{Y}$, and $^{88}\mathrm{Sr}(p,\ensuremath{\gamma})^{89}\mathrm{Y}$ at incident proton-beam energies from 2.5 to 3.6, 2 to 5, and 1.5 to 5 MeV, respectively.Conclusions: The experimental data reported in the present work are in very good agreement with the talys 1.95 calculations obtained with the default combination of OMP, NLD, and $\ensuremath{\gamma}\mathrm{SF}$ models. This combination is based on purely phenomenological models. A semimicroscopic proton-nucleus optical model potential was optimized at low energies leading to an equally good agreement between experimental data and theoretical calculations based solely on combinations of fully semimicroscopic models of OMP, NLD, and $\ensuremath{\gamma}\mathrm{SF}$. Our results highlight the need for a continued effort on the systematic study of proton-capture reactions to reduce the range of uncertainties arising from global nuclear models for as wide a range of relevant nuclei as possible. In this regard, new ($p,\ensuremath{\gamma}$) data at the lowest possible energies below the opening of the neutron channel are of key importance to improve global proton-nucleus optical model potentials.

[1]  M. Axiotis,et al.  Systematics of the semimicroscopic proton-nucleus optical potential at low energies relevant for nuclear astrophysics , 2021, 2103.07129.

[2]  Y. S. Cho,et al.  Reference database for photon strength functions , 2019, The European Physical Journal A.

[3]  S. Harissopulos Cross-section measurements of capture reactions relevant to p-process nucleosynthesis⋆ , 2018, The European Physical Journal Plus.

[4]  G. Provatas,et al.  Cross section measurements of proton capture reactions on Mo isotopes relevant to the astrophysical p process , 2018, The European Physical Journal A.

[5]  S. Hilaire,et al.  Large-scale deformed quasiparticle random-phase approximation calculations of the γ -ray strength function using the Gogny force , 2016, 1607.08483.

[6]  D. Bleuel,et al.  Experimentally constrained ($p,\gamma$)$^{89}$Y and ($n,\gamma$)$^{89}$Y reaction rates relevant to the $p$-process nucleosynthesis , 2015, 1510.00969.

[7]  V. Avrigeanu,et al.  Further explorations of the α -particle optical model potential at low energies for the mass range A ≈45 -209 , 2014, 1406.1656.

[8]  H. Becker,et al.  Cross section measurements of proton capture reactions relevant to the p process: The case of 89 Y(p,γ) 90 Zr and 121,123 Sb(p,γ) 122,124 Te , 2013 .

[9]  A. Koning,et al.  Temperature-dependent combinatorial level densities with the D1M Gogny force , 2012 .

[10]  Marcel Arnould,et al.  Databases and tools for nuclear astrophysics applications BRUSsels Nuclear LIBrary (BRUSLIB), Nuclear Astrophysics Compilation of REactions II (NACRE II) and Nuclear NETwork GENerator (NETGEN) , 2012, 1212.0628.

[11]  S. Goriely,et al.  Large-scale Continuum random-phase approximation predictions of dipole strength for astrophysical applications , 2012, 1209.5956.

[12]  Ryan M. Ferguson,et al.  THE JINA REACLIB DATABASE: ITS RECENT UPDATES AND IMPACT ON TYPE-I X-RAY BURSTS , 2010, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[13]  S. Kailas,et al.  RIPL – Reference Input Parameter Library for Calculation of Nuclear Reactions and Nuclear Data Evaluations , 2009 .

[14]  K. Schilling,et al.  Dipole strength in Y 89 up to the neutron-separation energy , 2009 .

[15]  Arjan J. Koning,et al.  Improved microscopic nuclear level densities within the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov plus combinatorial method , 2008 .

[16]  H. Becker,et al.  Cross-section measurements of capture reactions relevant to the p process using a 4π-γ -summing method , 2007 .

[17]  C. Rolfs Feature Article: Enhanced Electron Screening in Metals: A Plasma of the Poor Man , 2006 .

[18]  H. Becker,et al.  High-Z electron screening: the cases 50V(p,n)50Cr and 176Lu(p,n)176Hf , 2006 .

[19]  Belgium,et al.  Photodisintegration of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays revisited , 2004, astro-ph/0412109.

[20]  M. Arnould,et al.  The p-process of stellar nucleosynthesis: astrophysics and nuclear physics status , 2003 .

[21]  S. Goriely,et al.  Microscopic HFB+QRPA predictions of dipole strength for astrophysics applications , 2003, nucl-th/0306005.

[22]  Arjan J. Koning,et al.  Local and global nucleon optical models from 1 keV to 200 MeV , 2003 .

[23]  M. Kokkoris,et al.  The 88Sr(p, γ)89Y reaction at astrophysically relevant energies , 2003 .

[24]  Stéphane Goriely,et al.  Microscopic nuclear level densities for practical applications , 2001 .

[25]  T. Rauscher,et al.  Proton capture cross section of Sr isotopes and their importance for nucleosynthesis of proton-rich nuclides , 2001, nucl-ex/0109001.

[26]  E. Bauge,et al.  Lane consistent, semimicroscopic nucleon nucleus optical model , 2001 .

[27]  S. Goriely Radiative neutron captures by neutron-rich nuclei and the r-process nucleosynthesis , 1998 .

[28]  E. Bauge,et al.  Semimicroscopic nucleon-nucleus spherical optical model for nuclei with A>=40 at energies up to 200 MeV , 1998 .

[29]  F. Thielemann,et al.  Nuclear level density and the determination of thermonuclear rates for astrophysics , 1996, astro-ph/9602087.

[30]  Hodgson,et al.  Global optical potentials for emitted alpha particles. , 1994, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[31]  Raman,et al.  Density of discrete levels in 116Sn. , 1993, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[32]  James W. Truran,et al.  The R-process and nucleochronology , 1991 .

[33]  Uhl,et al.  Test of gamma-ray strength functions in nuclear reaction model calculations. , 1990, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[34]  Nolte,et al.  Global optical potential for alpha particles with energies above 80 MeV. , 1987, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[35]  H. Feldmeier,et al.  Level density of a Fermi gas with pairing interactions , 1985 .

[36]  A. Lejeune Low-energy optical model potential in finite nuclei from Reid's hard core interaction , 1980 .

[37]  Z. Wilhelmi,et al.  Gamma-ray strength functions for A = 70–90 nuclei , 1979 .

[38]  H. Vonach,et al.  Level density parameters for the back-shifted fermi gas model in the mass range 40 < A < 250 , 1973 .

[39]  G. R. Satchler,et al.  Optical-model analysis of the scattering of 24.7 MeV alpha particles , 1966 .

[40]  Axel,et al.  ELECTRIC DIPOLE GROUND STATE TRANSITION WIDTH STRENGTH FUNCTION AND 7 MEV PHOTON INTERACTIONS. Technical Report No. 30 , 1962 .

[41]  Shigueo Watanabe,et al.  High energy scattering of deuterons by complex nuclei , 1958 .

[42]  D. Brink,et al.  Individual particle and collective aspects of the nuclear photoeffect , 1957 .

[43]  Herman Feshbach,et al.  The Inelastic Scattering of Neutrons , 1952 .

[44]  André Lejeune,et al.  Microscopic calculation of the symmetry and Coulomb components of the complex optical-model potential , 1977 .