Object fixation by the blowfly during tethered flight in a simulated three-dimensional environment.

The ability of flies to detect and fixate objects moving relative to their background was investigated in a flight simulator during translational tethered flight. The fly experienced optic flow that depended on its own actions and reactions in a similar way as in free-flight (closed-loop) conditions. Fixation of an object required turning responses towards it. The simulated distances between the fly, object and background were varied systematically by changing the velocities with which the object and the background pattern moved from the frontal to the back part of the fly's visual field. Fixation responses were only elicited when the object was simulated to be closer than the background. The fly's fixation performance was better with close than with more distant objects. Since, under many stimulus conditions, fixation responses were either elicited or entirely failed to be elicited, it is concluded that object fixation behaviour is gated in the visuo-motor pathway.

[1]  M. Egelhaaf On the neuronal basis of figure-ground discrimination by relative motion in the visual system of the fly , 1985 .

[2]  M. Egelhaaf,et al.  Edge detection by landing honeybees: Behavioural analysis and model simulations of the underlying mechanism , 1997, Vision Research.

[3]  W. Gronenberg,et al.  Premotor descending neurons responding selectively to local visual stimuli in flies , 1992, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[4]  A. Borst How Do Flies Land?From behavior to neuronal circuits , 1990 .

[5]  W. Gronenberg,et al.  Descending neurons supplying the neck and flight motor of diptera: Physiological and anatomical characteristics , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  B. Kimmerle,et al.  Detection of object motion by a fly neuron during simulated flight , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  Encoding of motion in real time by the fly visual system , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  A. Borst,et al.  A look into the cockpit of the fly: visual orientation, algorithms, and identified neurons , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  E. Staudacher,et al.  Gating of sensory responses of descending brain neurones during walking in crickets , 1998 .

[10]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Visual Motion and Its Role in the Stabilization of Gaze , 1992 .

[11]  B. Kimmerle,et al.  Object detection in the fly during simulated translatory flight , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[12]  D. Regan,et al.  Figure-ground segregation by motion contrast and by luminance contrast. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[13]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Course Control in Insects , 1989 .

[14]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Visual figure–ground discrimination in the honeybee: the role of motion parallax at boundaries , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[15]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Detectability of velocity gradients in moving random-dot patterns , 1983, Vision Research.