The aim of this paper is to adopt a compromise ratio (CR) methodology for fuzzy multi-attribute single-expert decision making proble. In this paper, the rating of each alternative has been described by linguistic terms, which can be expressed as triangular fuzzy numbers. The compromise ratio method for fuzzy multiattribute single expert decision making has been considered here by taking the ranking index based on the concept that the chosen alternative should be as close as possible to the ideal solution and as far away as possible from the negative-ideal solution simultaneously. From logical point of view, the distance between two triangular fuzzy numbers also is a fuzzy number, not a crisp value. Therefore a fuzzy distance measure, which is itself a fuzzy number, has been used here to calculate the difference between two triangular fuzzy numbers. Now in this paper, with the help of this fuzzy distance measure, it has been shown that the compromise ratio is a fuzzy number and this eases the problem of the decision maker to take the decision. The computation principle and the procedure of the compromise ratio method have been described in detail in this paper. A comparative analysis of the compromise ratio method previously proposed [1] and the newly adopted method have been illustrated with two numerical examples. Keywords—Compromise ratio method, Fuzzy multi-attribute single-expert decision making, Fuzzy number, Linguistic variable
[1]
Deng-Feng Li,et al.
Compromise ratio method for fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making
,
2007,
Appl. Soft Comput..
[2]
Debjani Chakraborty,et al.
Structural quantization of vagueness in linguistic expert opinions in an evaluation programme
,
2001,
Fuzzy Sets Syst..
[3]
Richard Bellman,et al.
Decision-making in fuzzy environment
,
2012
.
[4]
Jian-Bo Yang,et al.
On the centroids of fuzzy numbers
,
2006,
Fuzzy Sets Syst..
[5]
Reay-Chen Wang,et al.
Group decision-making using a fuzzy linguistic approach for evaluating the flexibility in a manufacturing system
,
2004,
Eur. J. Oper. Res..
[6]
Debjani Chakraborty,et al.
A theoretical development on a fuzzy distance measure for fuzzy numbers
,
2006,
Math. Comput. Model..
[7]
Francisco Herrera,et al.
A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments
,
1996,
Fuzzy Sets Syst..
[8]
Jian Ma,et al.
A fuzzy set approach to the evaluation of journal grades
,
2002,
Fuzzy Sets Syst..
[9]
José L. Verdegay,et al.
Linguistic decision‐making models
,
1992,
Int. J. Intell. Syst..