Improving bone strength prediction in human proximal femur specimens through geometrical characterization of trabecular bone microarchitecture and support vector regression

Abstract. We investigate the use of different trabecular bone descriptors and advanced machine learning techniques to complement standard bone mineral density (BMD) measures derived from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for improving clinical assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk. For this purpose, volumes of interest were extracted from the head, neck, and trochanter of 146 ex vivo proximal femur specimens on multidetector computer tomography. The trabecular bone captured was characterized with (1) statistical moments of the BMD distribution, (2) geometrical features derived from the scaling index method (SIM), and (3) morphometric parameters, such as bone fraction, trabecular thickness, etc. Feature sets comprising DXA BMD and such supplemental features were used to predict the failure load (FL) of the specimens, previously determined through biomechanical testing, with multiregression and support vector regression. Prediction performance was measured by the root mean square error (RMSE); correlation with measured FL was evaluated using the coefficient of determination R2. The best prediction performance was achieved by a combination of DXA BMD and SIM-derived geometric features derived from the femoral head (RMSE: 0.869±0.121, R2: 0.68±0.079), which was significantly better than DXA BMD alone (RMSE: 0.948±0.119, R2: 0.61±0.101) (p<10−4). For multivariate feature sets, SVR outperformed multiregression (p<0.05). These results suggest that supplementing standard DXA BMD measurements with sophisticated femoral trabecular bone characterization and supervised learning techniques can significantly improve biomechanical strength prediction in proximal femur specimens.

[1]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[2]  C C Glueer,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography in assessment of osteoporosis. , 1987, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[3]  M. Drezner,et al.  Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: Report of the asbmr histomorphometry nomenclature committee , 1987, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Support Vector Regression Machines , 1996, NIPS.

[5]  H K Genant,et al.  Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: precision and relation to bone strength. , 1997, Bone.

[6]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[7]  O. Johnell,et al.  An Assessment Tool for Predicting Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[8]  T Aschenbrenner,et al.  Scaling-index method as an image processing tool in scanning-probe microscopy. , 2001, Ultramicroscopy.

[9]  Analysing large-scale structure - I. Weighted scaling indices and constrained randomization , 2002, astro-ph/0207140.

[10]  H K Genant,et al.  Measurement of bone mineral density at the spine and proximal femur by volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in elderly women with and without vertebral fractures. , 2002, Bone.

[11]  Volker Kuhn,et al.  Bone Strength at Clinically Relevant Sites Displays Substantial Heterogeneity and Is Best Predicted From Site‐Specific Bone Densitometry , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  H Sievänen,et al.  Patient‐Specific DXA Bone Mineral Density Inaccuracies: Quantitative Effects of Nonuniform Extraosseous Fat Distributions , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[13]  Ernst J. Rummeny,et al.  Scaling index method: a novel nonlinear technique for the analysis of high-resolution MRI of human bones , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[14]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Local 3D Scaling Properties for the Analysis of Trabecular Bone Extracted from High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Human Trabecular Bone: Comparison with Bone Mineral Density in the Prediction of Biomechanical Strength In Vitro , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[15]  H. Genant,et al.  Cortical and Trabecular Bone Mineral Loss From the Spine and Hip in Long‐Duration Spaceflight , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[16]  Niklas Zethraeus,et al.  Assessment of fracture risk , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[17]  Pamela J Schreiner,et al.  Long‐Term Prediction of Incident Hip Fracture Risk in Elderly White Women: Study of Osteoporotic Fractures , 2004, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[18]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[19]  Volker Kuhn,et al.  Improved performance of hip DXA using a novel region of interest in the upper part of the femoral neck: in vitro study using bone strength as a standard of reference. , 2005, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[20]  C. Cooper,et al.  Hip fractures in the elderly: A world-wide projection , 1992, Osteoporosis International.

[21]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Structural Analysis of Trabecular Bone of the Proximal Femur Using Multislice Computed Tomography: A Comparison with Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry for Predicting Biomechanical Strength In Vitro , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[22]  A. Silman,et al.  Predictive Value of BMD for Hip and Other Fractures , 2005, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[23]  Ernst J. Rummeny,et al.  Improving the textural characterization of trabecular bone structure to quantify its changes: the locally adapted scaling vector method , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[24]  Wenjun Li,et al.  Automated registration of hip and spine for longitudinal QCT studies: integration with 3D densitometric and structural analysis. , 2006, Bone.

[25]  T. M. Link,et al.  The 3D-based scaling index algorithm: a new structure measure to analyze trabecular bone architecture in high-resolution MR images in vivo , 2006, Osteoporosis International.

[26]  W. Skalli,et al.  Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone , 2006, Osteoporosis International.

[27]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  Characterization of trabecular bone structure from high-resolution magnetic resonance images using fuzzy logic. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[28]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  Analysis of Trabecular Bone Structure with Multidetector Spiral Computed Tomography in a Simulated Soft-Tissue Environment , 2007, Calcified Tissue International.

[29]  B. Collick,et al.  Performance evaluation of a dual-energy X-ray bone densitometer , 1989, Calcified Tissue International.

[30]  Thomas Baum,et al.  Proximal femur specimens: automated 3D trabecular bone mineral density analysis at multidetector CT--correlation with biomechanical strength measurement. , 2008, Radiology.

[31]  Peter Pietschmann,et al.  Osteoporosis: An Age-Related and Gender-Specific Disease – A Mini-Review , 2008, Gerontology.

[32]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Strength through structure: visualization and local assessment of the trabecular bone structure , 2008 .

[33]  R Schubert,et al.  Development and testing of texture discriminators for the analysis of trabecular bone in proximal femur radiographs. , 2009, Medical physics.

[34]  C. Räth,et al.  Automated 3D trabecular bone structure analysis of the proximal femur—prediction of biomechanical strength by CT and DXA , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[35]  Judith E. Adams,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[36]  Pei-Yi Hao,et al.  New support vector algorithms with parametric insensitive/margin model , 2010, Neural Networks.

[37]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[38]  Axel Wismüller,et al.  Prediction of Biomechanical Properties of Trabecular Bone in MR Images With Geometric Features and Support Vector Regression , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  Thomas Baum,et al.  Predicting the biomechanical strength of proximal femur specimens with bone mineral density features and support vector regression , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[40]  Patrick Chabrand,et al.  Radiographic bone texture analysis is correlated with 3D microarchitecture in the femoral head, and improves the estimation of the femoral neck fracture risk when combined with bone mineral density. , 2013, European journal of radiology.