Multicultural Task Groups

This study sought to explain the contribution imbalance between minority and majority members of multicultural task groups in terms of differences in personal characteristics outside of racial or ethnic identity. Business students who volunteered to participate in a decision-making exercise were assigned to four-person groups on the bases of sex and minority status. A total of 41 multicultural groups were formed. Aftenvard, participants individually completed questionnaires on the experience and their personal characteristics. Low comnmnunication competetce, low inasculinity, and highfemininity were associated both with minority status and with low contribution to decision making. As a block the personal variables explained more variance in contribution to decision making than did minority status alone. In addition, high contributing minorities appeared to be motivated by needs unlike those of high contributing nonminorities. The implications of these findings for facilitators of multicultural groups are discussed.

[1]  G. Thompson,et al.  A Comparative Study of Selected Attitudes, Values, and Personality Characteristics of American, Chinese, and Indian Students , 1962 .

[2]  L. R. Hoffman,et al.  Differences and disagreement as factors in creative group problem solving. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[3]  H. Triandis,et al.  Member Heterogeneity and Dyadic Creativity , 1965 .

[4]  S. Bem.  The measurement of psychological androgyny. , 1974, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[5]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  A Behaviorally-Based Measure of Manifest Needs in Work Settings. , 1976 .

[6]  B. Ruben.  Assessing Communication Competency for Intercultural Adaptation , 1976 .

[7]  J. Ruhe,et al.  Effects of Racial Composition On Small Work Groups , 1977 .

[8]  R. Kalin.  Method for Scoring Androgyny as a Continuous Variable , 1979 .

[9]  J. Lefkowitz,et al.  Assessment of achievement and power motivation of Blacks and Whites, using a Black and White TAT, with Black and White administrators. , 1980 .

[10]  M. Gordon,et al.  Commitment to the Union: Development of a Measure and an Examination of Its Correlates , 1980 .

[11]  Androgyny Across Two Cultures , 1981 .

[12]  E. Fodor,et al.  The power motive as an influence on group decision making. , 1982 .

[13]  G. Hofstede.  The Cultural Relativity of the Quality of Life Concept , 1984 .

[14]  Eugene F. Stone,et al.  Some issues associated with the use of moderated regression , 1984 .

[15]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The Effects of Communication on Technological Innovation , 1984 .

[16]  Molefi Kete Asante,et al.  Black and White Communication , 1985 .

[17]  V. K. Vaid-Raizada.  Management of Interethnic Conflict in an Indian Manufacturing Organization , 1985 .

[18]  R. Rubin.  The validity of the communication competency assessment instrument , 1985 .

[19]  Androgyny Is it Really the Product of Educated, Middle-Class Western Societies , 1987 .

[20]  O. Shenkar,et al.  The Cultural Context of Negotiations: The Implications of Chinese Interpersonal Norms , 1987 .

[21]  J. Skvoretz.  Models of participation in status-differentiated groups. , 1988 .

[22]  M. Kozan.  Cultural Influences on Styles of Handling Interpersonal Conflicts: Comparisons Among Jordanian, Turkish, and U.S. Managers , 1989 .

[23]  Clive J. Fullagar,et al.  A Longitudinal Test of a Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Union Loyalty , 1989 .

[24]  Paula L. Rechner,et al.  Experiential Effects of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy and Consensus Approaches to Strategic Decision Making , 1989 .

[25]  Guo-ming Chen.  Relationships of the dimensions of intercultural communication competence , 1989 .

[26]  J. B. Shaw.  A Cognitive Categorization Model for the Study of Intercultural Management , 1990 .

[27]  Taylor Cox.  Problems with Research by Organizational Scholars on Issues of Race and Ethnicity , 1990 .

[28]  L. Falkenberg.  Improving the Accuracy of Stereotypes Within the Workplace , 1990 .

[29]  V. J. Binion.  Psychological androgyny: A black female perspective , 1990 .

[30]  T. Cox,et al.  Managing cultural diversity: implications for organizational competitiveness , 1991 .

[31]  L. Gruenfeld,et al.  Masculinity, Femininity, and Behavior in Groups , 1992 .

[32]  Catherine Kirchmeyer,et al.  Multicultural Groups , 1992 .