Collateral efficacy in drug discovery: taking advantage of the good (allosteric) nature of 7TM receptors.

Seven-transmembrane receptors are prototypic allosteric proteins with the ability to adopt numerous conformations, many of which interact with cellular partners to initiate cellular biochemical processes. Defining efficacy as the ability of ligands to stabilize some of these conformations (which, in turn, possess physiological activity) presents a wider definition of efficacy beyond simple integrated cellular response; numerous or 'pluridimensional' efficacies are required to describe ligands. Specifically, some agonists might only partially activate the library of potential signaling systems in a cell or some antagonists might actively induce receptor internalization without activation. This article reviews data to demonstrate that there is no longer support for a linear view of efficacy whereby a single receptor activation state triggers all possible receptor interactions with a cell. Instead, a view of collateral efficacy, in which ligands can produce portions of the possible behaviors of receptors, is presented. Concepts related to the molecular mechanism for this effect (discussed in the literature as 'stimulus trafficking', 'biased agonism' or 'functional selectivity') and discussion of the possible therapeutic implications of this mechanism are presented.

[1]  R. Lefkowitz,et al.  β-Arrestin Scaffolding of the ERK Cascade Enhances Cytosolic ERK Activity but Inhibits ERK-mediated Transcription following Angiotensin AT1a Receptor Stimulation* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  H. Loh,et al.  Distinct Differences Between Morphine‐ and [d‐Ala2,N‐MePhe4,Gly‐ol5]‐Enkephalin‐ μ‐Opioid Receptor Complexes Demonstrated by Cyclic AMP‐Dependent Protein Kinase Phosphorylation , 1998, Journal of neurochemistry.

[3]  Laurent Journot,et al.  Differential signal transduction by five splice variants of the PACAP receptor , 1993, Nature.

[4]  A. Beaudet,et al.  Agonist‐ and antagonist‐induced sequestration/internalization of neuropeptide Y Y1 receptors in HEK293 cells , 2003, British journal of pharmacology.

[5]  P Ghanouni,et al.  Functionally Different Agonists Induce Distinct Conformations in the G Protein Coupling Domain of the β2Adrenergic Receptor* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  Christopher J. Evans,et al.  Morphine Activates Opioid Receptors without Causing Their Rapid Internalization* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  R. Lefkowitz,et al.  Distinct β-Arrestin- and G Protein-dependent Pathways for Parathyroid Hormone Receptor-stimulated ERK1/2 Activation* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  T. Kenakin,et al.  Agonist-receptor efficacy. II. Agonist trafficking of receptor signals. , 1995, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[9]  R. Mullins,et al.  β-Arrestin–Dependent Endocytosis of Proteinase-Activated Receptor 2 Is Required for Intracellular Targeting of Activated Erk1/2 , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  Pascale G. Charest,et al.  β-Arrestin-mediated activation of MAPK by inverse agonists reveals distinct active conformations for G protein-coupled receptors , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  L. Lopalco,et al.  Long-lasting CCR5 internalization by antibodies in a subset of long-term nonprogressors: a possible protective effect against disease progression. , 2006, Blood.

[12]  Robert J. Lefkowitz,et al.  Transduction of Receptor Signals by ß-Arrestins , 2005, Science.

[13]  Christopher Haslett,et al.  Bombesin and Substance P Analogues Differentially Regulate G-protein Coupling to the Bombesin Receptor , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  T. Kohout,et al.  Differential Desensitization, Receptor Phosphorylation, β-Arrestin Recruitment, and ERK1/2 Activation by the Two Endogenous Ligands for the CC Chemokine Receptor 7* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  T. Kenakin,et al.  Determining the Potency and Molecular Mechanism of Action of Insurmountable Antagonists , 2006, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[16]  T. Kenakin,et al.  The CCR5 Receptor-Based Mechanism of Action of 873140, a Potent Allosteric Noncompetitive HIV Entry Inhibitor , 2005, Molecular Pharmacology.

[17]  R. Mailman,et al.  8,9-Dihydroxy-2,3,7,11b-tetrahydro-1H-naph[1,2,3-de]isoquinoline: A Potent Full Dopamine D1 Agonist Containing a Rigid β-Phenyldopamine Pharmacophore , 1996 .

[18]  Arthur Christopoulos,et al.  Functional Selectivity and Classical Concepts of Quantitative Pharmacology , 2007, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[19]  Terry Kenakin,et al.  Efficacy at g-protein-coupled receptors , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[20]  A. Herz,et al.  Opioid receptors are coupled tightly to G proteins but loosely to adenylate cyclase in NG108-15 cell membranes. , 1988, Molecular pharmacology.

[21]  R. A. Moyer,et al.  An Opioid Agonist that Does Not Induce μ-Opioid Receptor—Arrestin Interactions or Receptor Internalization , 2007, Molecular Pharmacology.

[22]  L. Miller,et al.  Antagonist-stimulated internalization of the G protein-coupled cholecystokinin receptor. , 1997, Molecular pharmacology.

[23]  S. Edelstein,et al.  The Neurokinin A Receptor Activates Calcium and cAMP Responses through Distinct Conformational States* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  H. Mitsuya,et al.  Spirodiketopiperazine-Based CCR5 Inhibitor Which Preserves CC-Chemokine/CCR5 Interactions and Exerts Potent Activity against R5 Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 In Vitro , 2004, Journal of Virology.

[25]  Sadashiva S Karnik,et al.  Multiple Signaling States of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors , 2005, Pharmacological Reviews.

[26]  E Meller,et al.  Comparative effects of receptor inactivation, 17 beta-estradiol and pertussis toxin on dopaminergic inhibition of prolactin secretion in vitro. , 1992, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[27]  L. Bačáková,et al.  Positive cooperativity of acetylcholine and other agonists with allosteric ligands on muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. , 1997, Molecular pharmacology.

[28]  L. Luttrell Composition and function of G protein-coupled receptor signalsomes controlling mitogen-activated protein kinase activity , 2007, Journal of Molecular Neuroscience.

[29]  Heping Cheng,et al.  Spontaneous β2-Adrenergic Signaling Fails To Modulate L-Type Ca2+ Current in Mouse Ventricular Myocytes , 1999 .

[30]  G. Mazzocchi,et al.  Human pheochromocytomas express orexin receptor type 2 gene and display an in vitro secretory response to orexins A and B. , 2001, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[31]  F. Ehlert,et al.  Estimation of the affinities of allosteric ligands using radioligand binding and pharmacological null methods. , 1988, Molecular pharmacology.

[32]  M. B. Ruckle,et al.  Constitutively Active μ-Opioid Receptors Inhibit Adenylyl Cyclase Activity in Intact Cells and Activate G-proteins Differently than the Agonist [d-Ala2,N-MePhe4,Gly-ol5]Enkephalin , 2001 .

[33]  David R. Sibley,et al.  Interactions of the Novel Antipsychotic Aripiprazole (OPC-14597) with Dopamine and Serotonin Receptor Subtypes , 1999, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[34]  R. Mailman,et al.  Differential Activation of Adenylate Cyclase and Receptor Internalization by Novel Dopamine D1 Receptor Agonists , 2005, Molecular Pharmacology.

[35]  A. Howlett,et al.  Chemically Distinct Ligands Promote Differential CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor-Gi Protein Interactions , 2005, Molecular Pharmacology.

[36]  J. Violin,et al.  β-Arrestin 2-Dependent Angiotensin II Type 1A Receptor-Mediated Pathway of Chemotaxis , 2005, Molecular Pharmacology.

[37]  P. Leff Inverse agonism: theory and practice. , 1995, TIPS - Trends in Pharmacological Sciences.

[38]  Terry Kenakin,et al.  Ligand-selective receptor conformations revisited: the promise and the problem. , 2003, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[39]  J. Kukkonen Regulation of receptor-coupling to (multiple) G proteins. A challenge for basic research and drug discovery. , 2004, Receptors & channels.

[40]  M. Bouvier,et al.  Receptor activity‐independent recruitment of βarrestin2 reveals specific signalling modes , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[41]  J. Black,et al.  Operational models of pharmacological agonism , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[42]  T. Kenakin Protean Agonists , 1997, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Marc Parmentier,et al.  Multiple active states and oligomerization of CCR5 revealed by functional properties of monoclonal antibodies. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[44]  Stephenson Rp A modification of receptor theory. 1956. , 1997 .

[45]  K. Palczewski,et al.  Crystal structure of rhodopsin: implications for vision and beyond. , 2001, Current opinion in structural biology.

[46]  B. Kobilka,et al.  Fluorescent labeling of purified beta 2 adrenergic receptor. Evidence for ligand-specific conformational changes. , 1995, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[47]  T. Kenakin New Concepts in Drug Discovery: Collateral Efficacy and Permissive Antagonism , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[48]  Jean Salamero,et al.  HIV Coreceptor Downregulation as Antiviral Principle: SDF-1α–dependent Internalization of the Chemokine Receptor CXCR4 Contributes to Inhibition of HIV Replication , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[49]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. , 1991, Science.

[50]  S. Mundell,et al.  Agonist-Selective Mechanisms of μ-Opioid Receptor Desensitization in Human Embryonic Kidney 293 Cells , 2006, Molecular Pharmacology.

[51]  R. Maki,et al.  Distinct Conformations of the Corticotropin Releasing Factor Type 1 Receptor Adopted following Agonist and Antagonist Binding Are Differentially Regulated* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[52]  P. A. Friedman,et al.  Activation-independent Parathyroid Hormone Receptor Internalization Is Regulated by NHERF1 (EBP50)* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[53]  T. Oas,et al.  The structural distribution of cooperative interactions in proteins: analysis of the native state ensemble. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  T. Kenakin,et al.  The use of stimulus-biased assay systems to detect agonist-specific receptor active states: implications for the trafficking of receptor stimulus by agonists. , 2000, Molecular pharmacology.

[55]  T. Kenakin Collateral efficacy as a pharmacological problem applied to new drug discovery , 2006, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[56]  Burgen As Conformational changes and drug action. , 1981 .

[57]  Yang Xiang,et al.  Sequential binding of agonists to the beta2 adrenoceptor. Kinetic evidence for intermediate conformational states. , 2004, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[58]  I. Hall,et al.  Agonist and Inverse Agonist Actions of β-Blockers at the Human β2-Adrenoceptor Provide Evidence for Agonist-Directed Signaling , 2003 .

[59]  J. Rodríguez-Fernández,et al.  The Multiple Personalities of the Chemokine Receptor CCR7 in Dendritic Cells1 , 2006, The Journal of Immunology.

[60]  B. Roth,et al.  The Dynamin-dependent, Arrestin-independent Internalization of 5-Hydroxytryptamine 2A (5-HT2A) Serotonin Receptors Reveals Differential Sorting of Arrestins and 5-HT2A Receptors during Endocytosis* 210 , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[61]  B. Roth,et al.  Clozapine and other 5-hydroxytryptamine-2A receptor antagonists alter the subcellular distribution of 5-hydroxytryptamine-2A receptors in vitro and in vivo , 1999, Neuroscience.

[62]  Jyrki P. Kukkonen,et al.  Agonist trafficking of Gi/o‐mediated α2A‐adrenoceptor responses in HEL 92.1.7 cells , 2001 .

[63]  M. Bouvier,et al.  Distinct Signaling Profiles of β1 and β2 Adrenergic Receptor Ligands toward Adenylyl Cyclase and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Reveals the Pluridimensionality of Efficacy , 2006, Molecular Pharmacology.

[64]  G. Mazzocchi,et al.  Orexin A stimulates cortisol secretion from human adrenocortical cells through activation of the adenylate cyclase-dependent signaling cascade. , 2001, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[65]  Bryan L Roth,et al.  Paradoxical trafficking and regulation of 5-HT2A receptors by agonists and antagonists , 2001, Brain Research Bulletin.

[66]  Emmanuel Hermans,et al.  Biochemical and pharmacological control of the multiplicity of coupling at G-protein-coupled receptors. , 2003, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[67]  M. Lederman,et al.  Cutting Edge: Human β Defensin 3—A Novel Antagonist of the HIV-1 Coreceptor CXCR41 , 2006, The Journal of Immunology.

[68]  Terry Kenakin,et al.  Drug efficacy at G protein-coupled receptors. , 2002, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[69]  L. Hunyady,et al.  Independent β-arrestin 2 and G protein-mediated pathways for angiotensin II activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  J. Parma,et al.  The thyrotropin receptor and the regulation of thyrocyte function and growth. , 1992, Endocrine reviews.

[71]  G. Piñeyro,et al.  Internalization and Src Activity Regulate the Time Course of ERK Activation by Delta Opioid Receptor Ligands* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[72]  C. Woodward Is the slow exchange core the protein folding core? , 1993, Trends in biochemical sciences.