The structure analysis of the CSCWD conference's collaboration network

Collaboration networks are among some of the social networks and offer us the opportunity to study the structure underlying the networks. In this paper, we utilize the social network analysis (SNA) framework to understand what characterizes the social structure of the CSCWD conference's paper co-authorship network. It can potentially provide us with an understanding of the individuals and the network. We consider two scientists to be connected if they have authored a paper together, system like the co-authorship network of the conference is inherently dynamic, and so we represent it as a time-varying graph. Each graph is a static cumulative network. We then give results for the average distance and the diameter they show that this network forms a “small world”. We then also give the clustering coefficient demonstrating the presence of clustering of the collaboration between the scientists, as well as the increasing proportion of the giant component, it can serve as an additional support that the community would work well if it is densely connected. Through those figures, we also want to find some potential actions that can be taken to further develop the conference and other similar conferences.

[1]  Russell C. Coile,et al.  Lotka's frequency distribution of scientific productivity , 1977, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[3]  V Latora,et al.  Small-world behavior in time-varying graphs. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  What Trends in Chinese Social Media , 2011, ArXiv.

[5]  Seungyeop Han,et al.  Analysis of topological characteristics of huge online social networking services , 2007, WWW '07.

[6]  Gerard Delanty The Foundations of Social Theory , 2009 .

[7]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[8]  S. Havlin,et al.  Epidemic threshold for the susceptible-infectious-susceptible model on random networks. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[9]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[10]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[11]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Tracing information flow on a global scale using Internet chain-letter data , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[13]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Pajek - Analysis and Visualization of Large Networks , 2004, Graph Drawing Software.

[14]  Alfred J. Lotka,et al.  The frequency distribution of scientific productivity , 1926 .

[15]  Deborah Davis,et al.  Occupation, Class and Social Networks in Urban China , 2005 .

[16]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Structure and evolution of online social networks , 2006, KDD '06.

[17]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[18]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Social Networks and Organizations , 2012 .

[19]  John Scott Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[20]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Social Network Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[21]  Andrei Z. Broder,et al.  Graph structure in the Web , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[22]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Modeling Blog Dynamics , 2009, ICWSM.

[23]  Yun Chi,et al.  Information flow modeling based on diffusion rate for prediction and ranking , 2007, WWW '07.

[24]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  A measurement-driven analysis of information propagation in the flickr social network , 2009, WWW '09.

[25]  Daniel B. Horn,et al.  Six degrees of jonathan grudin: a social network analysis of the evolution and impact of CSCW research , 2004, CSCW.

[26]  Nathan Eagle,et al.  Persistence and periodicity in a dynamic proximity network , 2012, ArXiv.

[27]  Y. Bian Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China , 1997 .

[28]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Kelly A. Lyons,et al.  The evolution of the CASCON community: a social network analysis , 2010, CASCON.

[30]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Epidemic thresholds in real networks , 2008, TSEC.

[31]  M. Newman 1 Who is the best connected scientist ? A study of scientific coauthorship networks , 2004 .

[32]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Structure and evolution of blogspace , 2004, CACM.

[33]  H E Stanley,et al.  Classes of small-world networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Hao Tu,et al.  Sina Microblog: An Information-Driven Online Social Network , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Cyberworlds.