Probability Bounds Analysis as a General Approach to Sensitivity Analysis in Decision Making under Uncertainty

Engineers often perform sensitivity analyses to explore how changes in the inputs of a physical process or a model affect the outputs. This type of exploration is also important for the decision-making process. Specifically, engineers may want to explore whether the available information is sufficient to make a robust decision, or whether there exists sufficient uncertainty—i.e., lack of information—that the optimal solution to the decision problem is unclear, in which case it can be said to be sensitive to information state. In this paper, it is shown that an existing method for modeling and propagating uncertainty, called Probability Bounds Analysis (PBA), actually provides a general approach for exploring the global sensitivity of a decision problem that involves both probabilistic and imprecise information. Specifically, it is shown that PBA conceptually generalizes an approach to sensitivity analysis suggested in the area of decision analysis. The global nature of the analysis theoretically guarantees that the decision maker will identify any sensitivity in the formulated problem and information state. However, a tradeoff is made in the numerical implementation of PBA; a particular existing implementation that preserves the guarantee of identifying existing sensitivity is overly conservative and can result in “false alarms.” The use of interval arithmetic in sensitivity analysis is discussed, and additional advantages and limitations of PBA as a sensitivity analysis tool are identified.

[1]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Constructing Probability Boxes and Dempster-Shafer Structures , 2003 .

[2]  Alex M. Andrew,et al.  Uncertainty and Information: Foundations of Generalized Information Theory , 2006 .

[3]  Robert T. Clemen,et al.  Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis , 1997 .

[4]  W W Daniel,et al.  An introduction to decision analysis. , 1978, The Journal of nursing administration.

[5]  Gerhard Tintner,et al.  The Theory of Choice Under Subjective Risk and Uncertainty , 1941 .

[6]  Jim W. Hall,et al.  Uncertainty-based sensitivity indices for imprecise probability distributions , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  W. T. Tucker,et al.  Sensitivity in risk analyses with uncertain numbers. , 2006 .

[8]  G. Klir Uncertainty and Information: Foundations of Generalized Information Theory , 2005 .

[9]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  The Value of Using Imprecise Probabilities in Engineering Design , 2006 .

[10]  Daniel Berleant,et al.  Bounding the Results of Arithmetic Operations on Random Variables of Unknown Dependency Using Intervals , 1998, Reliab. Comput..

[11]  Ramon E. Moore Methods and applications of interval analysis , 1979, SIAM studies in applied mathematics.

[12]  Ronald A. Howard,et al.  Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis , 1989 .

[13]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[14]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  A Comparison of Probability Bounds Analysis and Sensitivity Analysis in Environmentally Benign Design and Manufacture , 2006, DAC 2006.

[15]  Robert C. Williamson,et al.  Probabilistic arithmetic. I. Numerical methods for calculating convolutions and dependency bounds , 1990, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[16]  Ruichen Jin,et al.  Analytical Variance-Based Global Sensitivity Analysis in Simulation-Based Design Under Uncertainty , 2005, DAC 2004.

[17]  Gordon Hazen,et al.  Javelin Diagrams: A Graphical Tool for Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis , 2004, Decis. Anal..

[18]  Henry E. Kyburg Objective Probabilities , 1987, IJCAI.

[19]  I. Levi On Indeterminate Probabilities , 1974 .

[20]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Sensitivity analysis using probability bounding , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[21]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Probability bounds analysis , 1998 .

[22]  Agus Sudjianto,et al.  Relative Entropy Based Method for Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis in Engineering Design , 2006 .

[23]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models , 1996 .

[24]  I. Good Good Thinking: The Foundations of Probability and Its Applications , 1983 .

[25]  P. Walley Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities , 1990 .

[26]  Antonio Prado Moreno,et al.  Vlerick Leuven Gent Working Paper Series 2003/22 Starting Resource Configurations of Research-based Start-ups and the Interaction with Technology , 2022 .

[27]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Arithmetic and Other Operations on Dempster-Shafer Structures , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[28]  P. Fishburn Foundations of decision analysis along the way , 1989 .

[29]  Ted Eschenbach,et al.  Spiderplots versus Tornado Diagrams for Sensitivity Analysis , 1992 .

[30]  Ronald A. Howard,et al.  Decision analysis: practice and promise , 1988 .

[31]  B. P. Welford,et al.  The Science of Decision Making. , 1969 .

[32]  Efstratios Nikolaidis,et al.  Types of Uncertainty in Design Decision Making , 2004 .

[33]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Managing the collection of information under uncertainty using information economics , 2006 .

[34]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Numerical Methods for Propagating Imprecise Uncertainty , 2006, DAC 2006.

[35]  I. Sobol Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[36]  Jay L. Devore,et al.  Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences , 1982 .

[37]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  ELICITATION OF SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF DECISION-MAKING * , 1978 .

[38]  Kurt Weichselberger The theory of interval-probability as a unifying concept for uncertainty , 2000, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[39]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Why Are Intervals and Imprecision Important In Engineering Design , 2006 .