Teaching marginalized children primary science teachers professional development through collaborative action research

This paper discusses an attempt on teachers’ professional development through collaborative action research to enhance marginalized children’s learning. Despite all efforts to overcome the difficulties of learning encountered by marginalized children, their performance both in the external as well as in the school-based assessments show poor performance especially in subjects like Science and Mathematics. This situation prevails and has resulted in dropout of the students at the primary level before they pursue for secondary education. Based on a series of observations, focus group discussions (FGD) with teachers and consecutive school visits, it was identified that the teachers face some difficulties in teaching Science, Mathematics and language. Teachers tend to use similar teaching approaches as those were being used in the urban schools, which are more teacher-directed in nature. Further, many teachers do not possess sound pedagogical skills to teach Science and Mathematics and to employ alternative approaches suitable for marginalized children in their context. To overcome this situation, teaching modules are developed by the teachers and researchers to provide alternative ways of teaching science. Additionally, teachers become known to the concept of action research. Two professional development workshops have been conducted to introduce some alternative approaches to teach primary science. Preliminary findings show that teachers perceive the modules very useful and beneficial to them. Moreover, the students demonstrate better motivation to learn as well as active involvement in the learning activities. Keywords: Teachers’ professional development, marginalized children, teaching and learning science, collaborative action research, primary school

[1]  H. Bradbury,et al.  Handbook of action research : participative inquiry and practice , 2001 .

[2]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers , 2001 .

[3]  Karen Goodnough Teacher Development through Action Research: A Case Study of an Elementary Teacher , 2001 .

[4]  David Falvo,et al.  Developing professionalism in teaching through technology skill development among rural teachers , 2003 .

[5]  Margarete Kedzior,et al.  Teacher Professional Development , 2004 .

[6]  J. Bransford,et al.  Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do. , 2005 .

[7]  F. Javier Perales-Palacios,et al.  Teaching physics by means of cartoons: a qualitative study in secondary education , 2002 .

[8]  Ann L. Sherman,et al.  The Use of Science Kits in the Professional Development of Rural Elementary School Teachers. , 2008 .

[9]  C. Teddlie,et al.  The International Handbook of School Effectiveness Research , 1999 .

[10]  J. Brophy Teacher behavior and student achievement , 1984 .

[11]  David Reynolds,et al.  School Effectiveness and Teacher Effectiveness in Mathematics: Some Preliminary Findings from the Evaluation of the Mathematics Enhancement Programme (Primary) , 2000 .

[12]  S. Anderson Improving schools through teacher development : case studies of the Aga Khan Foundation projects in East Africa , 2002 .

[13]  Quality Teaching: Building a Flexible and Dynamic Approach. GEC Working Paper Series. Number 2. , 2005 .

[14]  James H. Stronge,et al.  Qualities of Effective Teachers , 2002 .

[15]  B. Boyle,et al.  A longitudinal study of teacher change: what makes professional development effective? , 2004 .

[16]  Richard D. Sagor,et al.  Guiding School Improvement With Action Research , 2000 .

[17]  B. Bloom Human Characteristics and School Learning , 1979 .

[18]  Collaborative Action Research and School Improvement: We Can't Have One Without the Other , 2009 .

[19]  Leonard A. Annetta,et al.  A Comparison of Rural Elementary School Teacher Attitudes Toward Three Modes of Distance Education for Science Professional Development , 2008 .

[20]  Changing teaching and learning relationships through collaborative action research: learning to ask different questions , 2006 .

[21]  M. Cheng Enhancing Creativity of Elementary Science Teachers - a preliminary study , 2001 .

[22]  “If You Know Our Names It Helps!” , 2006 .

[23]  L. Kyriakides Generic and Differentiated Models of Educational Effectiveness: Implications for the Improvement of Educational Practice , 2007 .

[24]  Jennifer I. Berne,et al.  Chapter 6 : Teacher Learning and the Acquisition of Professional Knowledge: An Examination of Research on Contemporary Professlonal Development , 1999 .

[25]  L. Darling-Hammond Reforming Teacher Preparation and Licensing: Debating the Evidence , 2000, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[26]  Jaap Scheerens,et al.  Effective Schooling : Research, Theory and Practice , 1992 .

[27]  Andy Hargreaves,et al.  What's worth fighting for in your school : working together for improvement , 1992 .

[28]  T. Seidel,et al.  Teaching Effectiveness Research in the Past Decade: The Role of Theory and Research Design in Disentangling Meta-Analysis Results , 2007 .

[29]  Leonidas Kyriakides,et al.  Assessing Teacher Effectiveness: Different models , 2004 .

[30]  M. Harris Lessons from Prairie Teachers , 2001 .