Mapping Crime: Principle And Practice

ion and translates this into a map that is read by the map user and transferred to the user’s mind. Choosing a crime map Chapter 1 characterized thematic maps as falling into the following broad categories: statistical, point, choropleth, isoline, surface, and linear. How do we choose the most appropriate type for mapping crime and crime-related phenomena? Some decisions jump out at us while others are open to interpretation. For example, if we want to see the precise locations of burglaries for the last month, then we use a point map of addresses of incidents. Or perhaps a city council member has asked the police department for a map summarizing the number of incidents of graffiti per structure by city neighborhoods. This calls for a choropleth map, with neighborhood boundaries making up the geographic units. Links between victim and offender residences demand a linear representation. A generalized picture of crime risk or incidents is seen best with an isoline or surface map, and census information depicting the relationship between poverty and race can be shown using either a statistical or choropleth map. Because of the infinite potential combinations of crime-related conditions that can be depicted on maps, we can combine map types to put more information on the same map. For example, we can combine nominal and ratio data, such as a choropleth map of drug-related crime by patrol beats and add the locations of drug markets on the same map. Crime mappers should be aware of the potential for combining thematic map types, provided that the result is not overloaded with information—or just plain incomprehensible. An overloaded map will have so much information that the eye is unable to take it all in. It will prevent the reader from discriminating between what is important and what is not. Examples of thematic maps Perhaps the best way to get a feel for the kinds of maps used to display crime data is to look at examples and to think about why each type of map was selected. A good place to start is the Web site of the National Institute of Justice Crime Mapping Research Center (http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/cmrc), which provides links to police departments across the United States. Another useful Web site is maintained by Hunter College in New York (http://everest.hunter.cuny.edu/ capse/projects/nij/crime.html). (See the appendix for additional information.) Thematic maps using point symbols: The dot map When should point symbols be used? The first prerequisite is that you have locational detail—information specific to your points, such as street addresses or coordinates in latitude/longitude or some other system, such as State Plane (explained in chapter 1). The second prerequisite is that the audience needs locational detail. If you have point data, but the audience wants information summarized by patrol areas or neighborhoods, then the point data can be added up, or aggregated, to the areas of interest. Examples of point, or dot, maps are shown in figures 2.3 and 2.4.

[1]  Michael P. Peterson,et al.  Interactive and Animated Cartography , 1995 .

[2]  Kurt R. Brekke THE CANADA GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM , 1973 .

[3]  L. Curtis Criminal violence: National patterns and behavior , 1974 .

[4]  Terry A. Slocum Thematic Cartography and Visualization , 1998 .

[5]  K. Harries,et al.  The Geography of Execution: The Capital Punishment Quagmire in America , 1997 .

[6]  Stuart Lottier,et al.  Distribution of Criminal Offenses in Sectional Regions , 1938 .

[7]  James L. Lebeau,et al.  MAPPING IT OUT : REPEAT-ADDRESS BURGLAR ALARMS AND BURGLARIES , 1998 .

[8]  R. Clarke Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies , 1992 .

[9]  David Weisburd,et al.  Crime Mapping and Crime Prevention , 1998 .

[10]  K. Harries Teaching about the Geography of Crime and Justice. , 1984 .

[11]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  HOT SPOTS OF CRIME AND CRIMINAL CAREERS OF PLACES , 1995 .

[12]  Keith D. Harries,et al.  Crime, a spatial perspective , 1982 .

[13]  A. Robinson Elements of Cartography , 1953 .

[14]  Alan M. MacEachren,et al.  How Maps Work - Representation, Visualization, and Design , 1995 .

[15]  G. F. Pyle,et al.  The spatial dynamics of crime , 1974 .

[16]  George F. Rengert,et al.  The geography of illegal drugs , 1998 .

[17]  Woodrow W. Nichols,et al.  Urban Structure and Criminal Mobility , 1976 .

[18]  Thomas F. Rich The Use of Computerized Mapping in Crime Control and Prevention Programs , 1995 .

[19]  P. Taylor Quantitative methods in geography: An introduction to spatial analysis , 1977 .

[20]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[21]  A. MacEachren,et al.  Some Truth With Maps: A Primer on Symbolization and Design , 2011 .

[22]  D. Myers ANALYSIS WITH LOCAL CENSUS DATA: PORTRAITS OF CHANGE. , 1992 .

[23]  D. Herbert,et al.  The Geography of Crime , 1989 .

[24]  K. Harries Serious Violence: Patterns of Homicide and Assault in America , 1990 .

[25]  Susan J. Smith Crime, Space, And Society , 1986 .

[26]  John Campbell Map use and analysis , 1991 .

[27]  Alan M. MacEachren,et al.  Visualization in modern cartography , 1994 .

[28]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Sex-Related Differences and Similarities in Geographic and Environmental Spatial Abilities , 1999 .

[29]  M. Felson,et al.  Crime and Everyday Life , 1998 .

[30]  Ken Pease,et al.  Crime Placement, Displacement, and Deflection , 1990, Crime and Justice.

[31]  James P. Allen,et al.  The Ethnic Quilt: Population Diversity in Southern California , 1997 .

[32]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1986 .

[33]  H. D. McKay,et al.  Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas , 1943 .

[34]  Faye S. Taxman,et al.  APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTER MAPPING TO POLICE OPERATIONS , 1995 .

[35]  David Weisburd,et al.  Measuring immediate spatial displacement : Methodological issues and problems , 1995 .

[36]  James Byrne,et al.  The Social Ecology of Crime , 1986 .

[37]  J. Coppock ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING IN GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH , 1962 .

[38]  Hj Wie Human Geography: Culture, Society and Space , 1977 .

[39]  D. G. Taylor,et al.  Paths of Neighborhood Change: Race and Crime in Urban America , 1987 .

[40]  Jeffrey S. Torguson,et al.  Cartography , 2019, Dictionary of Geotourism.

[41]  Victor Goldsmith,et al.  Analyzing Crime Patterns: Frontiers of Practice , 1999 .

[42]  K. Clarke Getting Started with Geographic Information Systems , 1996 .

[43]  Geoffrey C. Barnes,et al.  DEFINING AND OPTIMIZING DISPLACEMENT , 1995 .

[44]  J. Burt,et al.  Elementary statistics for geographers , 1995 .

[45]  Marvin E. Wolfgang,et al.  The National Survey of Crime Severity , 1985 .

[46]  S L Boggs,et al.  Urban crime patterns. , 1965, American sociological review.

[47]  T. Foresman The history of geographic information systems : perspectives from the pioneers , 1998 .

[48]  C. C. Van Vechten,et al.  Towards an Understanding of Juvenile Delinquency. , 1955 .

[49]  Mark Monmonier,et al.  Cartographies of Danger: Mapping Hazards in America , 1997 .

[50]  Robert J. Bursik,et al.  Neighborhoods and crime , 1993 .

[51]  Patricia L. Brantingham,et al.  Patterns in Crime , 1984 .

[52]  J. Cohen,et al.  The Geography of Crime , 1941 .

[53]  Ned Levine,et al.  Spatial Statistics and GIS: Software Tools to Quantify Spatial Patterns , 1996 .

[54]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  Envisioning Information , 1990 .

[55]  John E. Eck,et al.  Crime and place , 1995 .

[56]  The Criminal's Image of the City , 1979 .

[57]  Peter Reuter,et al.  Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising. Research in Brief. National Institute of Justice. , 1998 .

[58]  Glen Norcliffe Inferential Statistics for Geographers. An Introduction. , 1977 .

[59]  James L Lebeau THE TEMPORAL ECOLOGY OF CALLS FOR POLICE SERVICE , 1995 .

[60]  Keith D. Harries,et al.  Crime and the environment , 1980 .

[61]  K. Harries The Geography of American Crime, 1968 , 1971 .

[62]  M. Mcluhan The Medium Is the Massage , 1967 .

[63]  Andreas M. Olligschlaeger ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS AND CRIME MAPPING by , 1998 .

[64]  Kurt E. Brassel,et al.  MAPPING FROM AN AUTOMATED DISPLAY SYSTEM , 1979 .

[65]  R. Marx The TIGER system: automating the geographic structure of the United States census. , 1986, Government publications review.

[66]  K. Harries,et al.  JUVENILE GUN CRIME AND SOCIAL STRESS: BALTIMORE, 1980–1990 , 1994 .

[67]  Simon Hakim,et al.  Metropolitan Crime Patterns , 1986 .

[68]  Clifford Wood,et al.  Cartographic design : theoretical and practical perspectives , 1996 .

[69]  I. Mcharg Design With Nature , 1969 .

[70]  M. Monmonier How to Lie with Maps , 1991 .

[71]  Bret M. Territo,et al.  Crime analysis through computer mapping: By C.B. Block M. Dabdoub, and S. Fregly, Police Executive Research Forum, Washington D.C., 1995, paperback, xiv + 287 pp., US$29.95 (+ $3.75 s and h), ISBN 1-878734-34-2 , 1996 .

[72]  C. Tomlin Geographic information systems and cartographic modeling , 1990 .

[73]  Robert Hammond,et al.  Quantitative Techniques in Geography: An Introduction , 1974 .