A study on Singaporean women's acceptance of using mobile phones to seek health information

OBJECTIVE This paper is an exploratory study that investigates Singaporean women's acceptance of using mobile phones to seek health information. METHOD A mobile web containing health topics was developed to track Singaporean women's actual use of their mobile phones to seek health information. A survey questionnaire measured variables hypothesized to predict Behavioural Intention. The survey responses were then matched to the data collected on actual use. Correlation analysis and hierarchical regression were used to analyze the data collected. RESULTS Findings revealed that Perceived Usefulness and Self-efficacy positively predicted the intention to use mobile phones to seek health information. The study also confirmed the presence of an intention-behaviour gap among participants. The conversion of intention to actual behaviour hinges on technical concerns and design factors. Prior experiences with health information seeking reinforced women's evaluations of the usefulness of the mobile web application and helped them to feel more self-efficacious about using their mobile phones to seek health information. Using mobile phones to seek health information was found to be complementary to online health information seeking and can be regarded as an alternative source to the internet for seeking health information. CONCLUSION This study contributes to the existing literature by applying the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in the context of mobile health information seeking, for which there has been a lack of studies, and demonstrated that the inclusion of additional variables can enhance TAM's predictive power. The empirical presence of an intention-behaviour gap calls for future research to investigate the reasons behind the gap. Finally, the findings from this study can serve as input to promote women's use of mobile phones for better self-management of health.

[1]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[2]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Myeong-Cheol Park,et al.  Mobile internet acceptance in Korea , 2005, Internet Res..

[4]  Bassam Hasan,et al.  A Path Analysis of the Impact of Application-Specific Perceptions of Computer Self-Efficacy and Anxiety on Technology Acceptance , 2010, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[5]  N. Guberman,et al.  Women as family caregivers: why do they care? , 1992, The Gerontologist.

[6]  J. Robbins,et al.  Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. , 2000, The Journal of family practice.

[7]  Xun Liu.  Empirical Testing of a Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: An Exploratory Study of Educational Wikis , 2010 .

[8]  Steven C. Rockwell,et al.  The effect of communication, writing, and technology apprehension on likelihood to use new communication technologies , 1997 .

[9]  Ming-Chien Hung,et al.  An empirical study of adopting mobile healthcare service: the family's perspective on the healthcare needs of their elderly members. , 2010, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[10]  Richard J. Holden,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[11]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage , 1995 .

[12]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[13]  Yuk Yee Yan.  Online Health Information Seeking Behavior in Hong Kong: An Exploratory Study , 2010, Journal of Medical Systems.

[14]  Mah Boon Yih.  An Investigation on Students' Acceptance of Writing Web Logs: A Test of Technology Acceptance Model , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Education Technology and Computer.

[15]  Michael R. Simonson,et al.  Development of a Standardized Test of Computer Literacy and a Computer Anxiety Index , 1987 .

[16]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[17]  J. Drew Procaccino,et al.  Toward wellness: Women seeking health information , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  J. Cheah,et al.  Chronic disease management: a Singapore perspective , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  Ian Douglas Sanders,et al.  Computer self-efficacy, gender, and educational background in South Africa , 2003, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[20]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  User Acceptance Enablers in Individual Decision Making About Technology: Toward an Integrated Model , 2002, Decis. Sci..

[21]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[22]  I. Ellams,et al.  Influences , 2020, Arsham-isms.

[23]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Physicians' resistance toward healthcare information technology: a theoretical model and empirical test , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Hun Choi,et al.  An acceptance model for an Internet protocol television service in Korea with prior experience as a moderator , 2010 .

[25]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 1996 .

[26]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: Multivariate results from the Pew surveys , 2006, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[27]  Jen-Her Wu,et al.  Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry : A structural equation model , 2006 .

[28]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[29]  Ji-Young An,et al.  Theory Development in Nursing and Healthcare Informatics: A Model Explaining and Predicting Information and Communication Technology Acceptance by Healthcare Consumers , 2007, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[30]  L. Baker,et al.  Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. , 2003, JAMA.

[31]  BudgenDavid,et al.  Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review , 2010 .

[32]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[33]  Harry Bouwman,et al.  Analysis of users and non-users of smartphone applications , 2010, Telematics Informatics.

[34]  Alan Durndell,et al.  Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Chorng-Shyong Ong,et al.  Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Explaining intranet use with the technology acceptance model , 2001, J. Inf. Technol..

[37]  B. Whitley.  Gender Differences in Computer-Related Attitudes and Behavior: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[38]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience , 1995 .

[40]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies , 2003 .

[41]  Diane Hamilton,et al.  Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  Su-Chao Chang,et al.  Exploring Adolescents' Intentions Regarding the Online Learning Courses in Taiwan , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[43]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  Help seeking behavior and the Internet: A national survey , 2006, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[44]  A. Colley,et al.  The effects of age, gender and computer experience upon computer attitudes , 1997 .

[45]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. , 1982 .

[46]  P. Sheeran.  Intention—Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review , 2002 .

[47]  Robert P. Hawkins,et al.  Factors Associated with Use of Interactive Cancer Communication System: An Application of the Comprehensive Model of Information Seeking , 2010, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[48]  J. D. Johnson,et al.  A Comprehensive Model of Cancer-Related Information Seeking Applied to Magazines , 1993 .

[49]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[50]  J. Rodin,et al.  Women's health. Review and research agenda as we approach the 21st century. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[51]  Qingxiong Ma,et al.  The Role of Internet Self-Efficacy in the Acceptance of Web-Based Electronic Medical Records , 2005, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[52]  B. Strickland,et al.  Sex-Related Differences in Health and Illness , 1988 .

[53]  M. Zanna,et al.  Attitudinal qualities relating to the strength of the attitude-behavior relationship☆ , 1978 .

[54]  Byoungsoo Kim,et al.  The difference of determinants of acceptance and continuance of mobile data services: A value perspective , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[55]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .