Objective:
The present study was designed to evaluate whether and how itraconazole affects the macrophage polarization and its reactivity to Candida albicans.
Methods:
Cell toxicity of itraconazole was measured using cell counting kit-8 assay in RAW264.7 cells. The cell models were induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), interleukin (IL)-4, or Candida albicans. Levels of cytokines secreted by RAW246.7 treated with itraconazole were detected by Luminex or Cytometric Bead Array compared to the controls without itraconazole treatment, and the expressions of inducible nitric oxide synthase and arginase (Arg) were determined by Western blot. Phagocytosis ability was measured by both flow cytometry and fluorescence microscope. The Student’s t test and one-way analysis of variance were used to calculate the differences between groups.
Results:
In comparison to the control, itraconazole inhibited the growth of the cells in both a time- and a dose-dependent manner. Increased secretion of IL-6 (0.25 μmol/L ITZ [538.03 ± 60.23 pg/mL, P < 0.05], 0.5 μmol/L [550.32 ± 47.87 pg/mL, P < 0.05] and 1 μmol/L [626.95 ± 75.24 pg/mL, P < 0.01] vs. control [370.43 ± 33.98 pg/mL]) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) (1 μmol/L ITZ vs. control: 2521.51 ± 444.06 pg/mL vs. 1617.85 ± 94.57 pg/mL, P < 0.05) were detected in the LPS-induced cell model with itraconazole treatment. In the cells induced by IL-4, itraconazole increased the secretion of IL-6 (1 μmol/L ITZ vs. control: 528.33 ± 11.60 pg/mL vs. 466.99 ± 28.32 pg/mL, P < 0.05), TNF-α (1 μmol/L ITZ vs. control: 4.85 ± 0.32 pg/mL vs. 4.30 ± 0.19 pg/mL, P < 0.05), and IL-1β (0.25 μmol/L [325.95 ± 13.97 pg/mL, P < 0.05], 0.5 μmol/L [332.38 ± 11.97 pg/mL, P < 0.05] and 1 μmol/L [334.35 ± 16.23 pg/mL, P < 0.05] vs. control [291.62 ± 17.03 pg/mL]), and reduced the secretion of IL-10 (1 μmol/L ITZ vs. control: 7.21 ± 0.68 pg/mL vs. 9.11 ± 0.14 pg/mL, P < 0.05). The secretion of IL-6 (1 μmol/L ITZ vs. control: 38.34 ± 1.36 pg/mL vs. 32.32 ± 0.84 pg/mL, P < 0.05) and TNF-α (1 μmol/L ITZ vs. control: 1060.17 ± 80.16 pg/mL vs. 890.84 ± 52.82 pg/mL, P < 0.01) was improved in Candida albicans-stimulated RAW264.7 cells under the treatment of itraconazole, while the secretion of IL-4 (0.5 μmol/L [2.86 ± 0.20 pg/mL, P < 0.05] and 1 μmol/L [2.24 ± 0.33 pg/mL, P < 0.001] vs. control [3.91 ± 0.23 pg/mL]) and IL-10 (1 μmol/L ITZ vs. control: 19.46 ± 2.05 pg/mL vs. 25.67 ± 1.95pg/mL, P < 0.05) decreased. In all three activated patterns, itraconazole enhanced the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (P < 0.01) and slightly inhibited the Arg-1 expression (P < 0.05). Phagocytosis ability of RAW264.7 cells at 1 μmol/L ITZ treatment was increased by 7.53% ± 2.21 % (P < 0.01) and 9.73% ± 2.03% (P < 0.01) at the ratio of cells: yeast of 1:4 and 1:8, respectively, in comparison to the control group.
Conclusion:
Itraconazole improved M1 polarization of RAW264.7 cells and enhanced the phagocytic capacity of RAW264.7 to Candida albicans, indicating a significant immunological enhancement. The study improves the understanding of undergoing mechanisms related to the anti-tumor and anti-infection effects of itraconazole.
Key words:
itraconazole; macrophage; immunomodulatory; macrophage polarization; Candida albicans
[1]
G. Piérard,et al.
Itraconazole
,
2000,
Reactions Weekly.
[2]
G. Ferrara,et al.
Triple negative breast cancer: Key role of Tumor-Associated Macrophages in regulating the activity of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents.
,
2018,
Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer.
[3]
Kayo Inoue,et al.
Repurposing itraconazole as an anticancer agent.
,
2017,
Oncology letters.
[4]
A. Casadevall,et al.
Extracellular vesicles from Paracoccidioides brasiliensis induced M1 polarization in vitro
,
2016,
Scientific Reports.
[5]
A. Hoeft,et al.
Antifungal antibiotics modulate the pro-inflammatory cytokine production and phagocytic activity of human monocytes in an in vitro sepsis model.
,
2015,
Life sciences.
[6]
S. Pyo,et al.
Involvement of ATF3 in the negative regulation of iNOS expression and NO production in activated macrophages
,
2015,
Immunologic Research.
[7]
Linnan Zhu,et al.
Cellular Metabolism and Macrophage Functional Polarization
,
2015,
International reviews of immunology.
[8]
M. Lorenz,et al.
Fungal Immune Evasion in a Model Host–Pathogen Interaction: Candida albicans Versus Macrophages
,
2013,
PLoS pathogens.
[9]
Alberto Mantovani,et al.
Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas.
,
2012,
The Journal of clinical investigation.
[10]
S. Gordon,et al.
Alternative activation of macrophages: mechanism and functions.
,
2010,
Immunity.
[11]
J. Edwards,et al.
Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation
,
2008,
Nature Reviews Immunology.
[12]
M. Waterman,et al.
Sterol 14α-Demethylase Cytochrome P450 (CYP51), a P450 in all Biological Kingdoms
,
2007
.
[13]
S. Ishijima,et al.
Morphological effects of itraconazole on murine macrophage.
,
1998,
FEMS immunology and medical microbiology.
[14]
T J Walsh,et al.
Antifungal agents: chemotherapeutic targets and immunologic strategies
,
1996,
Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.
[15]
J. Graybill,et al.
Pharmacokinetics of itraconazole following oral administration to normal volunteers
,
1988,
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.