Do Part–Whole Relations Produce Facilitation in the Picture–Word Interference Task?

Three experiments used the picture–word interference task to evaluate competing models of lexical access in spoken word production. Both the presence of a part–whole relation and association between the target and the interfering word were manipulated. Part terms associated with targets produced facilitation at early stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs; –300 ms in Experiment 1, –300 and –150 ms in Experiment 3), but not at SOA 0 ms. Otherwise, part terms tended to produce interference, with unassociated part terms producing a significant semantic interference effect (SIE) at SOA of 0 ms in Experiment 1, and a similar trend in Experiment 3. Experiment 2 replicated the materials and procedure of Costa, Alario, and Caramazza (2005, Experiment 2. On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture–word interference paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(1), 125–131), yet failed to find any semantic facilitation at SOA 0 ms. We propose that these findings are consistent with lexical competition accounts of SIE but difficult to explain in terms of the plausibility of the interfering words as responses to the target.

[1]  W. Heij,et al.  Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming. , 1990 .

[2]  Patrick F. Reidy.  An Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis , 2009 .

[3]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review , 2009 .

[4]  M. Bajo.  Semantic facilitation with pictures and words. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  P. J. Brooks,et al.  Contrasting effects of associates and coordinates in children with and without language impairment: A picture–word interference study , 2012, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[6]  Albert Costa,et al.  The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: does the response set matter? , 2000, Cognition.

[7]  Albert Costa,et al.  Set size and repetition in the picture–word interference paradigm: implications for models of naming , 2001, Cognition.

[8]  Geoffrey Underwood,et al.  SEMANTIC INTERFERENCE FROM UNATTENDED PRINTED WORDS , 1976 .

[9]  Olga Sachs,et al.  Is the Motor or the Garage More Important to the Car? The Difference Between Semantic Associations in Single Word and Sentence Production , 2012, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.

[10]  Albert Costa,et al.  On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  V. Ferreira,et al.  Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[13]  Tobias Bormann,et al.  The Role of Lexical-Semantic Neighborhood in Object Naming: Implications for Models of Lexical Access , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[14]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  P. Starreveld,et al.  Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. , 1996 .

[16]  J. Segui,et al.  Semantic and Associative Priming in Picture Naming , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[17]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[18]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Markus F Damian,et al.  Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Picture naming by young children: norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1997, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[21]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  When bees hamper the production of honey: lexical interference from associates in speech production. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Omissions in aphasic picture naming: Late age-of-acquisition is the culprit, not low semantic density , 2007, Brain and Language.

[23]  Z. Estes,et al.  Thematic thinking : the apprehension and consequences of thematic relations , 2011 .

[24]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[25]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Stephen J. Lupker,et al.  The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task , 1979 .

[27]  P. J. Brooks,et al.  Exploring the time course of semantic interference and associative priming in the picture–word interference task , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  W. Maki,et al.  Latent structure in measures of associative, semantic, and thematic knowledge , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Keith A Hutchison,et al.  Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Audrey K. Kittredge,et al.  Where is the effect of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture-naming errors , 2008, Cognitive neuropsychology.