The process of implementing a damage detection strategy for aerospace, civil and mechanical engineering infrastructure is referred to as structural health monitoring (SHM). Here damage is defined as changes to the material and/or geometric properties of these systems, including changes to the boundary conditions and system connectivity, which adversely affect the system's current or future performance. Our approach is to address the SHM problem in the context of a statistical pattern recognition paradigm (Farrar, Nix and Doebling, 2001). In this paradigm, the process can be broken down into four parts: (1) Operational Evaluation, (2) Data Acquisition, (3) Feature Extraction, and (4) Statistical Model Development for Feature Discrimination. When one attempts to apply this paradigm to data from 'real-world' structures, it quickly becomes apparent that data cleansing, normalization, fusion and compression, which can be implemented with either hardware or software, are inherent in Parts 2-4 of this paradigm. The authors believe that all approaches to SHM, as well as all traditional non-destructive evaluation procedures (e.g. ultrasonic inspection, acoustic emissions, active thermography) can be cast in the context of this statistical pattern recognition paradigm. It should be noted that the statistical modeling portion of the structural health monitoring process has received themore » least attention in the technical literature. The algorithms used in statistical model development usually fall into the three categories of group classification, regression analysis or outlier detection. The ability to use a particular statistical procedure from one of these categories will depend on the availability of data from both an undamaged and damaged structure. This paper will discuss each portion of the SHM statistical pattern recognition paradigm.« less
[1]
Rune Brincker,et al.
Vibration Based Inspection of Civil Engineering Structures
,
1993
.
[2]
Keith Worden,et al.
An Overview of Intelligent Fault Detection in Systems and Structures
,
2004
.
[3]
Hoon Sohn,et al.
DATA NORMALIZATION: A KEY FOR STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING
,
2001
.
[4]
David A. Nix,et al.
Vibration–based structural damage identification
,
2001,
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[5]
Hoon Sohn,et al.
Overview of Piezoelectric Impedance-Based Health Monitoring and Path Forward
,
2003
.
[6]
Charles R. Farrar,et al.
Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: A literature review
,
1996
.