Deep transfer learning-based prostate cancer classification using 3 Tesla multi-parametric MRI

PurposeThe purpose of the study was to propose a deep transfer learning (DTL)-based model to distinguish indolent from clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) lesions and to compare the DTL-based model with a deep learning (DL) model without transfer learning and PIRADS v2 score on 3 Tesla multi-parametric MRI (3T mp-MRI) with whole-mount histopathology (WMHP) validation.MethodsWith IRB approval, 140 patients with 3T mp-MRI and WMHP comprised the study cohort. The DTL-based model was trained on 169 lesions in 110 arbitrarily selected patients and tested on the remaining 47 lesions in 30 patients. We compared the DTL-based model with the same DL model architecture trained from scratch and the classification based on PIRADS v2 score with a threshold of 4 using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve (AUC). Bootstrapping with 2000 resamples was performed to estimate the 95% confidence interval (CI) for AUC.ResultsAfter training on 169 lesions in 110 patients, the AUC of discriminating indolent from clinically significant PCa lesions of the DTL-based model, DL model without transfer learning and PIRADS v2 score ≥ 4 were 0.726 (CI [0.575, 0.876]), 0.687 (CI [0.532, 0.843]), and 0.711 (CI [0.575, 0.847]), respectively, in the testing set. The DTL-based model achieved higher AUC compared to the DL model without transfer learning and PIRADS v2 score ≥ 4 in discriminating clinically significant lesions in the testing set.ConclusionThe DeLong test indicated that the DTL-based model achieved comparable AUC compared to the classification based on PIRADS v2 score (p = 0.89).

[1]  Rebecca L. Siegel Mph,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2018 , 2018 .

[2]  Feiyu Li,et al.  The efficiency of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) using PI-RADS Version 2 in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. , 2016, Clinical imaging.

[3]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[4]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. , 2011, Radiology.

[5]  А. С. Коробкин,et al.  Информативность мультипараметрического МР-исследования в выявлении рака предстательной железы. Классификация pi-rads (prostate imaging-reporting and data system) , 2015 .

[6]  Jae Y. Shin,et al.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning? , 2016, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[7]  O. Rouvière,et al.  Characterization of prostate lesions as benign or malignant at multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of three scoring systems in patients treated with radical prostatectomy. , 2014, Radiology.

[8]  Xavier Robin,et al.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[9]  Yan Liu,et al.  Deep residual learning for image steganalysis , 2018, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[10]  K. Kihara,et al.  Computer‐aided diagnosis of prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging using a convolutional neural network algorithm , 2018, BJU international.

[11]  B. G. Blijenberg,et al.  Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  D. Margolis,et al.  Risk Stratification Among Men With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 Category 3 Transition Zone Lesions: Is Biopsy Always Necessary? , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a computer-aided diagnosis system for determining cancer aggressiveness in prostate MRI , 2015, European Radiology.

[14]  Ronald C. Chen,et al.  Risk of Pathologic Upgrading or Locally Advanced Disease in Early Prostate Cancer Patients Based on Biopsy Gleason Score and PSA: A Population-Based Study of Modern Patients. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2018 , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[16]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Three Aspects on Using Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection in Medical Imaging , 2017, Deep Learning and Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Computing.

[17]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature Embedding , 2014, ACM Multimedia.

[18]  Jian Sun,et al.  Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[19]  Nima Tajbakhsh,et al.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning? , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[22]  Xin Yang,et al.  Automated diagnosis of prostate cancer in multi-parametric MRI based on multimodal convolutional neural networks , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  David Y. Lu,et al.  Characteristics of Detected and Missed Prostate Cancer Foci on 3-T Multiparametric MRI Using an Endorectal Coil Correlated With Whole-Mount Thin-Section Histopathology. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  John Kurhanewicz,et al.  Transatlantic Consensus Group on active surveillance and focal therapy for prostate cancer , 2012, BJU international.

[25]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[26]  Hugh J. Lavery,et al.  Do Gleason patterns 3 and 4 prostate cancer represent separate disease states? , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[27]  I. Tuerk,et al.  Comparing the Gleason prostate biopsy and Gleason prostatectomy grading system: the Lahey Clinic Medical Center experience and an international meta-analysis. , 2008, European urology.