Non-destructive identification of mealy apples using biospeckle imaging

Abstract An apple that is soft and lacks juiciness during consumption is characterized as a mealy fruit. Since mealiness in apple is considered as an undesirable quality parameter, this work aimed at developing classification models based on biospeckle imaging in order to recognize mealy from non-mealy apples. To evaluate the potential of biospeckle imaging in detection of mealiness, a total of 760 ‘Red Delicious’ apples were harvested. The 540 samples were stored under cold conditions for various time periods from 0 to 5 months. The remaining samples were kept at 20 °C and 95% relative humidity for 10–26 days. Biospeckle images of each apple were acquired at wavelengths of 680 and 780 nm, respectively. Biospeckle imaging was immediately followed by a confined compression test to measure fruit stiffness and juiciness. These parameters were used to categorize the samples into three classes called fresh, semi-mealy, and mealy. Results of clustering based on a self-organizing map showed that apple fruit are mealy when their stiffness and juiciness are less than 20 kN m−1 and 5 cm2, respectively. After classification of apples by destructive methods, time-historical speckle patterns were configured and biospeckle features such as the inertia moment, the absolute value of differences, and autocorrelation were extracted. Results showed that biospeckle activity for fresh samples was higher than semi-mealy and mealy. Finally, several neural network models were developed to classify apples. First, classification of apples into mealy and non-mealy classes was carried out, and then non-mealy apples were classified into fresh and semi-mealy classes. The best classification accuracy for fresh (81.7%) and semi-mealy (70.9%) apples were achieved at 780 nm. However, much better result (77.3% accuracy) for classification of mealy apples was observed at the wavelength of 680 nm.

[1]  M Ruiz-Altisent,et al.  Mealiness assessment in apples and peaches using MRI techniques. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[2]  Bart Nicolai,et al.  A mathematical model for the development of mealiness in apples , 2002 .

[3]  Mahmoud Omid,et al.  Comparing data mining classifiers for grading raisins based on visual features , 2012 .

[4]  Renfu Lu,et al.  Analysis of hyperspectral scattering images using locally linear embedding algorithm for apple mealiness classification , 2012 .

[5]  Anna Adamiak,et al.  The biospeckle method for the investigation of agricultural crops: A review , 2014 .

[6]  Ton van Leeuwen,et al.  Review of laser speckle contrast techniques for visualizing tissue perfusion , 2008, Lasers in Medical Science.

[7]  P. Barreiro,et al.  Prospects for the rapid detection of mealiness in apples by nondestructive NMR relaxometry , 2002 .

[8]  Hamid Reza Pourreza,et al.  Identification of nine Iranian wheat seed varieties by textural analysis with image processing , 2012 .

[9]  Anna Adamiak,et al.  Pre-harvest monitoring of apple fruits development with the use of biospeckle method , 2012 .

[10]  Dimitrios Moshou,et al.  Apple mealiness detection using fluorescence and self-organising maps , 2003 .

[11]  Pilar Barreiro,et al.  Determination of Mealiness in Apples using Ultrasonic Measurements , 2005 .

[12]  Zbigniew Ranachowski,et al.  COMPARISON OF PUNCTURE TEST, ACOUSTIC EMISSION AND SPATIAL-TEMPORAL SPECKLE CORRELATION TECHNIQUE AS METHODS FOR APPLE QUALITY EVALUATION * , 2008 .

[13]  F. A. Gunson,et al.  Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements 1: texture of apple fruit , 2002 .

[14]  Artur Zdunek,et al.  Relation of Biospeckle Activity with Quality Attributes of Apples , 2011, Sensors.

[15]  Artur Zdunek,et al.  Relation of biospeckle activity with chlorophyll content in apples , 2012 .

[16]  D. Bertrand,et al.  Prediction of the sensory quality of apples by physical measurements , 2004 .

[17]  Margarita Ruiz-Altisent,et al.  COMPARISON BETWEEN SENSORY AND INSTRUMENTAL MEASUREMENTS FOR MEALINESS ASSESSMENT IN APPLES. A COLLABORATIVE TEST , 1998 .

[18]  Héctor Rabal,et al.  Speckle time evolution characterization by the co-occurrence matrix analysis , 1999 .

[19]  Manuela Zude,et al.  WAVELENGTH SELECTION FOR PREDICTING PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF APPLE FRUIT BASED ON NEAR‐INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY , 2007 .

[20]  A. K. Nirala,et al.  Biospeckle activity measurement of Indian fruits using the methods of cross-correlation and inertia moments , 2013 .

[21]  Roberto A. Braga,et al.  Evaluation of activity through dynamic laser speckle using the absolute value of the differences , 2011 .

[22]  Leonid I. Muravsky,et al.  New nondestructive method based on spatial-temporal speckle correlation technique for evaluation of apples quality during shelf-life , 2007 .

[23]  Ning Wang,et al.  Detecting chilling injury in Red Delicious apple using hyperspectral imaging and neural networks , 2009 .

[24]  Alessandro Torricelli,et al.  Mealiness detection in apples using time resolved reflectance spectroscopy , 2005 .

[25]  Alessandro Torricelli,et al.  Sensory characteristics, quality and optical properties measured by time-resolved reflectance spectroscopy in stored apples , 2010 .

[26]  Christopher M. Triggs,et al.  Eating quality standards for apples based on consumer preferences , 2008 .

[27]  Min Huang,et al.  Apple mealiness detection using hyperspectral scattering technique , 2010 .

[28]  Ricardo Arizaga Methods of Dynamic Speckle Analysis : Statistical Analysis , 2018 .