A Multi-stage Sparse Coding Framework to Explore the Effects of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure

In clinical neuroscience, task-based fMRI (tfMRI) is a popular method to explore the brain network activation difference between healthy controls and brain diseases like Prenatal Alcohol Exposure (PAE). Traditionally, most studies adopt the general linear model (GLM) to detect task-evoked activations. However, GLM has been demonstrated to be limited in reconstructing concurrent heterogeneous networks. In contrast, sparse representation based methods have attracted increasing attention due to the capability of automatically reconstructing concurrent brain activities. However, this data-driven strategy is still challenged in establishing accurate correspondence across individuals and characterizing group-wise consistent activation maps in a principled way. In this paper, we propose a novel multi-stage sparse coding framework to identify group-wise consistent networks in a structured method. By applying this novel framework on two groups of tfMRI data (healthy control and PAE), we can effectively identify group-wise consistent activation maps and characterize brain networks/regions affected by PAE.

[1]  S Makeig,et al.  Spatially independent activity patterns in functional MRI data during the stroop color-naming task. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Michael L. Anderson,et al.  Describing functional diversity of brain regions and brain networks , 2013, NeuroImage.

[4]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on brain activation during an arithmetic task: an fMRI study. , 2009, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[5]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Online Learning for Matrix Factorization and Sparse Coding , 2009, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[6]  L. Pessoa Beyond brain regions: Network perspective of cognition–emotion interactions , 2012, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Heng Huang,et al.  Sparse representation of whole-brain fMRI signals for identification of functional networks , 2015, Medical Image Anal..

[9]  Dana Mastrovito,et al.  Interactions between Resting-State and Task-Evoked Brain Activity Suggest a Different Approach to fMRI Analysis , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[11]  P. Matthews,et al.  Neuroimaging: Applications of fMRI in translational medicine and clinical practice , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[13]  Sungho Tak,et al.  A Data-Driven Sparse GLM for fMRI Analysis Using Sparse Dictionary Learning With MDL Criterion , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.