Stroke Risk and Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Low CHA2DS2‐VASc Scores: Findings From the ORBIT‐AF I and II Registries

Background Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines suggest that for patients with atrial fibrillation who are at low risk for stroke (CHA2DS2VASc=1) (or women with CHA2DS2VASc=2) a variety of treatment strategies may be considered. However, in clinical practice, patterns of treatment in these “low‐risk” patients are not well described. The objective of this analysis is to define thromboembolic event rates and to describe treatment patterns in patients with low‐risk CHA2DS2VASc scores. Methods and Results We compared characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes among patients with a CHA2DS2VASc=0, CHA2DS2VASc=1, females with a CHA2DS2VASc=2, and CHA2DS2VASc ≥2 in ORBIT‐AF (Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation) I & II. Compared with CHA2DS2VASc ≥2 patients (84.2%), those with a CHA2DS2VASc=0 (60.3%), 1 (69.9%), and females with a CHA2DS2VASc score=2 (72.4%) were significantly less often treated with oral anticoagulation (P<0.0001). Stroke rates were low overall and ranged from 0 per 100 patient‐years in those with CHA2DS2VASc=0, 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] [0.5–1.2]) in those with CHA2DS2VASc=1, 0.8 (95% CI [0.4–1.6]) in females with a CHA2DS2VASc score=2, and 1.7 (95% CI [1.6–1.9]) in CHA2DS2VASc ≥2. All‐cause mortality (per 100 patient‐years) was highest in females with a CHA2DS2VASc score=2 (1.4) (95% CI [0.8–2.3]), compared with patients with a CHA2DS2VASc=0 (0.2) (95% CI [0.1–1.0]), and CHA2DS2VASc=1 (1.0) (95% CI [0.7–1.4]), but lower than patients with a CHA2DS2VASc ≥2 (5.7) (95% CI [5.4–6.0]). Conclusion The majority of CHA2DS2VASc=0‐1 patients are treated with oral anticoagulation. In addition, the absolute risks of death and stroke/transient ischemic attack were low among both male and females CHA2DS2VASc=0‐1 as well as among females with a CHA2DS2VASc score=2. Clinical Trial Registration URL:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01701817.

[1]  D. Singer,et al.  Wide Variation in Reported Rates of Stroke Across Cohorts of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation , 2017, Circulation.

[2]  P. Kirchhof,et al.  2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. , 2016, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[3]  G. Lip,et al.  Oral anticoagulation, aspirin, or no therapy in patients with nonvalvular AF with 0 or 1 stroke risk factor based on the CHA2DS2-VASc score. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  M. Huisman Patients with atrial fibrillation and a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1: are they at low or high stroke risk? , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  T. Chao,et al.  Should atrial fibrillation patients with 1 additional risk factor of the CHA2DS2-VASc score (beyond sex) receive oral anticoagulation? , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  L. Friberg,et al.  Benefit of anticoagulation unlikely in patients with atrial fibrillation and a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  M. Ezekowitz,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2014, Circulation.

[8]  M. Ezekowitz,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2014, Circulation.

[9]  C. Siu,et al.  Risk of stroke and intracranial hemorrhage in 9727 Chinese with atrial fibrillation in Hong Kong. , 2014, Heart rhythm.

[10]  G. Fonarow,et al.  Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II: rationale and design of the ORBIT-AF II registry. , 2014, American heart journal.

[11]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2014, Circulation.

[12]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. , 2012, European heart journal.

[13]  Gerhard Hindricks,et al.  2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation--developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[14]  B. Gersh,et al.  Outcomes registry for better informed treatment of atrial fibrillation: rationale and design of ORBIT-AF. , 2011, American heart journal.

[15]  D. Atar,et al.  Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2010, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[17]  A. Camm,et al.  Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2010, European heart journal.

[18]  Gregory Y H Lip,et al.  Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. , 2010, Chest.

[19]  R B D'Agostino,et al.  Stroke severity in atrial fibrillation. The Framingham Study. , 1996, Stroke.

[20]  P. Wolf,et al.  Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. , 1991, Stroke.

[21]  P. Wolf,et al.  Atrial fibrillation: a major contributor to stroke in the elderly. The Framingham Study. , 1987, Archives of internal medicine.

[22]  Hugh Calkins,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  Jennifer G. Robinson,et al.  ACCF/AHA TASK FORCE MEMBERS , 2013 .

[24]  R. Troughton,et al.  Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.