Reciprocal Teaching of Reading Comprehension Strategies for Students with Learning Disabilities Who Use English as a Second Language

In this study, we investigated the efficacy of 2 related interventions on the reading comprehension of seventh and eighth graders with learning disabilities who used English as a second language. All 26 students participated in reciprocal teaching for 15 days and then were randomly assigned for 12 days to 1 of 2 groups: reciprocal teaching with cooperative grouping (n = 13) or reciprocal teaching with cross-age tutoring (n = 13). Though there were no statistically significant differences between groups on 2 measures of comprehension, students in both groups made significant progress in reading comprehension. Analyses focused on understanding the performance of more and less successful students within groups. Findings revealed that initial reading ability and oral language proficiency seemed related to gains in comprehension, that a greater range of students benefited from strategy instruction than would have been predicted on the basis of previous research, and that students in both groups continued to show improvement in comprehension when provided minimal adult support.

[1]  Eugene E. García.  “Hispanic” children: Theoretical, empirical, and related policy issues , 1992 .

[2]  J. Cummins.  A Theoretical Framework for Bilingual Special Education , 1989, Exceptional children.

[3]  M. Longair.  The Theoretical Framework , 1998 .

[4]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[5]  Jim Cummins,et al.  Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy , 1985 .

[6]  H. Foot,et al.  Peer tutoring and tutor training , 1991 .

[7]  J. Michael O'Malley,et al.  Learning strategies in second language acquisition , 1990 .

[8]  Marguerite Ann Snow,et al.  The Multicultural Classroom: Readings for Content-Area Teachers , 1991 .

[9]  L. Baker,et al.  Comprehension Monitoring: Identifying and Coping with Text Confusions1 , 1979 .

[10]  R. Slavin,et al.  Mainstreaming Students with Mild Handicaps: Academic and Social Outcomes , 1983 .

[11]  H. Singer,et al.  Active Comprehension: Problem-Solving Schema with Question Generation for Comprehension of Complex Short Stories , 1982 .

[12]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Tutoring Learning Disabled Students: A Critical Review , 1985 .

[13]  J. Torgesen.  Conceptual and Educational Implications of the Use of Efficient Task Strategies by Learning Disabled Children , 1980, Journal of Learning Disabilities.

[14]  H. Chandler.  The Bilingual Special Education Interface , 1984, Journal of learning disabilities.

[15]  Robert Pritchard,et al.  The Effects of Cultural Schemata on Reading Processing Strategies. , 1990 .

[16]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Strategies That Improve Children's Memory and Comprehension of Text , 1989, The Elementary School Journal.

[17]  Jose Salvador Hernandez,et al.  Assisted Performance in Reading Comprehension Strategies with Non-English Proficient Students. , 1991 .

[18]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[19]  D. Deshler,et al.  Academic and Cognitive Interventions for LD Adolescents , 1984, Journal of learning disabilities.

[20]  J. Torgesen.  The Role of Nonspecific Factors in the Task Performance of Learning Disabled Children , 1977 .

[21]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[22]  Sinclair Goodlad,et al.  Peer Tutoring: A Guide to Learning by Teaching , 1989 .

[23]  Georgia Earnest García.  Factors Influencing the English Reading Test Performance of Spanish-Speaking Hispanic Children. Technical Report No. 539. , 1991 .

[24]  B. Davey,et al.  Effects of question-generation training on reading comprehension , 1986 .

[25]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Peer Interaction in Reading comprehension Instruction , 1987 .

[26]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Reading Education: Foundations for a Literate America , 1986 .

[27]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  A Schema-Theoretic View of Basic Processes in Reading Comprehension. Technical Report No. 306. , 1988 .

[28]  Peter Dewitz,et al.  Effects of Inference Training on Comprehension and Comprehension Monitoring. , 1987 .

[29]  E. Balajthy,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF DISABLED READERS’ METACOMPREHENSION ABILITY THROUGH SUMMARIZATION TRAINING USING EXPOSITORY TEXT: RESULTS OF THREE STUDIES , 1990 .

[30]  B. Keogh.  A System of marker variables for the field of learning disabilities , 1995 .

[31]  B. Rosenshine,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching: A Review of Nineteen Experimental Studies. , 1991 .

[32]  Bernice Y. L. Wong.  Contemporary Intervention Research in Learning Disabilities , 1992 .

[33]  Owen F. Boyle,et al.  Literacy Scaffolds: Strategies for First- and Second-Language Readers and Writers. , 1990 .

[34]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching Improves Standardized Reading-Comprehension Performance in Poor Comprehenders , 1990, The Elementary School Journal.

[35]  Courtney B. Cazden,et al.  Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Second Edition. , 2001 .

[36]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  The Role of Dialogue in Providing Scaffolded Instruction , 1986 .

[37]  Karen K. Wixson,et al.  Becoming a strategic reader , 1983 .

[38]  Donald D. Deshler,et al.  Validation of Learning Strategy Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities: Results of a Programmatic Research Effort , 1992 .

[39]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Fostering Literacy Learning in Supportive Contexts , 1992, Journal of learning disabilities.

[40]  Christine Pearson Casanave,et al.  Comprehension Monitoring in ESL Reading: A Neglected Essential , 1988 .

[41]  John H. Flavell,et al.  Stage-related properties of cognitive development , 1971 .

[42]  S. Paris,et al.  Children's Metacognitive Knowledge about Reading. , 1978 .

[43]  B. Wong,et al.  Self-Questioning Instructional Research: A Review , 1985 .

[44]  Robert J. Stevens,et al.  Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition: Two Field Experiments. , 1987 .

[45]  K. Rayner,et al.  The psychology of reading , 1989 .

[46]  Michael H. Long,et al.  Group Work, Interlanguage Talk,and Second Language Acquisition. , 1985 .

[47]  C. Bos,et al.  A Theory-Driven Interactive Instructional Model for Text Comprehension and Content Learning , 1992 .

[48]  J. Klingner.  Students helping students: Scaffolded cross-age tutoring in reading comprehension strategies for students with learning disabilities who use English as a second language , 1994 .

[49]  R. Weisberg.  1980s: A Change in Focus of Reading Comprehension Research: A Review of Reading/Learning Disabilities Research Based on an Interactive Model of Reading , 1988 .

[50]  M. Clarke.  The Short Circuit Hypothesis of esl Reading—or When Language Competence Interferes with Reading Performance , 1980 .

[51]  S. Paris,et al.  Children's Metacognition About Reading: issues in Definition, Measurement, and Instruction , 1987 .

[52]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: A Meta-analysis of Findings , 1982 .

[53]  Gerald G. Duffy,et al.  Effects of Explaining the Reasoning Associated with Using Reading Strategies. , 1987 .

[54]  Sarah Hudelson.  The Role of Native Language Literacy in the Education of Language Minority Children. , 1987 .

[55]  Robert T. Jiménez,et al.  A Delicate Balance: Enhancing Literature Instruction for Students of English as a Second Language. , 1994 .

[56]  Bonnie B. Armbruster.  Does Text Structure/Summarization Instruction Facilitate Learning from Expository Text? Technical Report No. 394. , 1986 .

[57]  R. Allington,et al.  COMPREHENSION AND COHERENCE: NEGLECTED ELEMENTS OF LITERACY INSTRUCTION IN REMEDIAL AND RESOURCE ROOM SERVICES , 1990 .