Hegemony and its discontents : a critical analysis of organizational knowledge transfer

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss the phenomenon of knowledge transfer within multinational corporations (MNCs), and how the imperatives of thought and action that constitute new knowledge are received in the terrain that constitutes the MNC subsidiary.Design/methodology/approach – This study employs an ethnographic approach, and juxtaposes primary data collection with a variety of secondary data sources.Findings – The data are analyzed in light of the theoretical construct of hegemony, and three themes theorized that underlie the process of knowledge transfer. These include knowledge loss at the local level, the coercive practices that ensure knowledge transfer, and the invocation of imperial subjectivities by the headquarters of the MNC when dealing with subsidiaries from poorer nations.Originality/value – This paper goes beyond the mainstream approaches into organizational knowledge transfer, by analyzing these issues in light of political economy, and the changing landscape of industri...

[1]  J. Ghosh,et al.  The market that failed: A decade of neoliberal economic reforms in India , 2002 .

[2]  James C. Scott,et al.  Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. , 1985, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[3]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[4]  S. Lukes.  Power: A Radical View , 1974 .

[5]  B. Cooke.  Managing Organizational Culture and Imperialism , 2003 .

[6]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[7]  S. Bate,et al.  Whatever Happened to Organizational Anthropology? A Review of the Field of Organizational Ethnography and Anthropological Studies , 1997 .

[8]  David C. Coff,et al.  The Knowledge-Leveraging Paradox: How to Achieve Scale without Making Knowledge Imitable , 2006 .

[9]  Melissa M. Appleyard,et al.  HOW DOES KNOWLEDGE FLOW? INTERFIRM PATTERNS IN THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY , 1996 .

[10]  C. Geertz,et al.  Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics , 2000 .

[11]  David L. Levy,et al.  The Institutional Entrepreneur as Modern Prince: The Strategic Face of Power in Contested Fields , 2007 .

[12]  P. Thompson,et al.  Ignorant Theory and Knowledgeable Workers: Interrogating the Connections between Knowledge, Skills and Services , 2001 .

[13]  Raymond Williams,et al.  Marxism and literature , 1977 .

[14]  M. Foucault,et al.  Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 , 1980 .

[15]  J. V. Maanen.  Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography , 1989 .

[16]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizational change and development. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[17]  H. Gadamer,et al.  Truth and Method , 1960 .

[18]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Organizational Learning: Affirming an Oxymoron , 1999 .

[19]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  P. Prasad.  Crafting Qualitative Research: Working in the Postpositivist Traditions , 2005 .

[21]  B. Turner,et al.  Grounded Theory and Organizational Research , 1986 .

[22]  D. Harvey,et al.  Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference , 1997 .

[23]  L. Lindkvist.  Knowledge Communities and Knowledge Collectivities: A Typology of Knowledge Work in Groups , 2005 .

[24]  P. Almeida,et al.  Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: the influence of the MNC and host country on innovation , 2004 .

[25]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Knowledge, Strategy, and the Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[26]  A. Prasad,et al.  Postcolonial Theory and Organizational Analysis , 2003 .

[27]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Re-Embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[28]  TsoukasHaridimos,et al.  On Organizational Becoming , 2002 .

[29]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  An Examination of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer: China-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park , 2006 .

[30]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Odd Couple: Making Sense of the Curious Concept of Knowledge Management , 2001 .

[31]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[32]  G. Ryle,et al.  心的概念 = The concept of mind , 1962 .

[33]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizing Knowledge , 1998 .

[34]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[35]  F. Hayek.  The economic nature of the firm: The use of knowledge in society , 1945 .

[36]  F. Hayek,et al.  The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism , 1989 .

[37]  S. L. Star,et al.  The Ethnography of Infrastructure , 1999 .

[38]  Anshuman Prasad,et al.  The Empire of Organizations and the Organization of Empires: Postcolonial Considerations on Theorizing Workplace Resistance , 2003 .

[39]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[40]  Christopher Grey,et al.  Beneath and Beyond Organizational Change Management: Exploring Alternatives , 2003 .

[41]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[42]  David E. Hojtnan.  Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the Third World , 1995 .

[43]  P. Ricoeur.  From text to action , 1991 .

[44]  David Grant,et al.  Knowledge Management or Management of Knowledge? Why People Interested in Knowledge Management Need to Consider Foucault and the Construct of Power , 2005 .

[45]  A. Parry.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 2002 .

[46]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  Knowledge and Organization , 2001 .

[47]  H. Schwartzman.  Ethnography in Organizations , 1992 .

[48]  R. Mir,et al.  Toward a Postcolonial Reading of Organizational Control , 2003 .

[49]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[50]  C. Geertz.  Deep play: notes on the Balinese cockfight , 2005, Daedalus.

[51]  D. Kwek.  Decolonizing and Re-Presenting Culture’s Consequences: A Postcolonial Critique of Cross-Cultural Studies in Management1 , 2003 .

[52]  Eleanor Macdonald,et al.  Crafting Selves: Power, Gender, and Discourses of Identity in a Japanese Workplace , 1990 .

[53]  R. Mir,et al.  The Organizational Imagination: From Paradigm Wars to Praxis , 2002 .

[54]  H. Tsoukas.  The firm as a distributed knowledge system : A constructionist approach , 1996 .

[55]  S. Harrison.  Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice , 2001 .

[56]  J. Porras,et al.  Organization development and transformation. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.

[57]  Ella Shohat.  Notes on the "Post-Colonial" , 1992 .

[58]  Aihwa Ong.  Spirits of Resistance and Capitalist Discipline: Factory Women in Malaysia , 1987 .

[59]  Robert Chia,et al.  On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[60]  G. Kunda.  Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation , 1993 .

[61]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[62]  S. Banerjee.  Whose Land Is It Anyway? National Interest, Indigenous Stakeholders, and Colonial Discourses , 2000 .

[63]  S. Barley.  Technicians in the Workplace: Ethnographic Evidence for Bringing Work into Organizational Studies , 1996 .

[64]  Geoffrey Nowell‐Smith,et al.  Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci , 2015 .

[65]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control Within Multinational Corporations , 1991 .

[66]  Markus C. Becker.  Managing Dispersed Knowledge: Organizational Problems, Managerial Strategies, and Their Effectiveness , 2001 .