iSpace: interactivity expression for self-expression in an online communication environment

In this paper, we suggest interactivity, which defines dynamic and invisible characteristics of an interactive system, as a medium for self-expression in an online communication environment. Since existing means of self-expression are visual- or text-oriented, they cover only a part of one's real self. Interactivity, however, is invisible, but still evokes emotional experiences depending on its value. Therefore, we expected that one's interactivity expression customization would also represent the different dimensions of one's characteristics. This study aims to explore the possibility of interactivity expressions as a new way of self-expression in an online communication environment. By conducting a user study with a social website prototype, namely, iSpace, in which each user's personal site can be distinguished by their different interactivity expressions, this study provides understandings of rationales and patterns of interactivity expressions, and design implications which we expect to inspire designers to consider them strategically in their design practices.

[1]  R. Larsen,et al.  Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Hyeon-Jeong Suk,et al.  My own-style interaction: exploring individuals' preferences to interactivity , 2011, CHI EA '11.

[3]  Youn-kyung Lim,et al.  Interactivity Attributes for Expression-oriented Interaction Design , 2011 .

[4]  Turhan Canli,et al.  Individual differences in emotion processing , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[5]  Willem-Paul Brinkman,et al.  Towards customized emotional design: an explorative study of user personality and user interface skin preferences , 2005 .

[6]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[7]  Suin Kim,et al.  Interactivity sketcher: crafting and experiencing interactivity qualities , 2011, CHI EA '11.

[8]  Michele M. Strano User Descriptions and Interpretations of Self-Presentation through Facebook Profile Images , 2008 .

[9]  Jan Blom,et al.  Personalization: a taxonomy , 2000, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[10]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Designing for the self: making products that help people become the person they desire to be , 2009, CHI.

[11]  Sandra L. Calvert,et al.  College students' social networking experiences on Facebook , 2009 .

[12]  D. Buss,et al.  Personality and mate preferences: five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. , 1997, Journal of personality.

[13]  Erin Malone,et al.  Designing social interfaces , 2009 .

[14]  S. Sundar,et al.  Personalization versus Customization: The Importance of Agency, Privacy, and Power Usage , 2010 .

[15]  Sang-Su Lee,et al.  Interactivity attributes: a new way of thinking and describing interactivity , 2009, CHI.