Interdependency in smart grid recovery

The pervasive use of information and communication technology (ICT) in the future power grid creates an interdependent system: ICT systems depend on power supply and the power grid depends on information channels and systems for monitoring and controlling. The automation of processes with ICT can reduce the most frequent failures and decrease their consequences. However, the added complexity and the tight integration comes with new failure sources and increased mutual dependencies between the systems and opens the possibility for more catastrophic failures. In this paper we focus on these interdependencies between the power grid and ICT in different phases of the recovery process of a power failure. We model the dependencies and quantify the effect of using smart monitoring devices in the detection phase. The analysis shows that adding battery backup into the communication network is a good measure to delay the interdependency effect encountered. The study of scenarios with different degrees of battery support, number of repair crews and fault detection mechanisms indicates that while automation can reduce the human effort needed for the most frequent failures, it can lead to longer down times in less frequent incidents, if no prevention measures are taken. Finally, we show that the skill sets and training level of the repair crews play a crucial role and can be used to prevent the negative effect in low frequency incidents.

[1]  G. Manimaran,et al.  An Information Architecture for Future Power Systems and Its Reliability Analysis , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[2]  Ilkka Norros,et al.  Towards risk-aware communications networking , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Poul E. Heegaard,et al.  Interdependency Modeling in Smart Grid and the Influence of ICT on Dependability , 2013, EUNICE.

[4]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks , 2009, Nature.

[5]  Kishor S. Trivedi,et al.  Survivability as a generalization of recovery , 2015, 2015 11th International Conference on the Design of Reliable Communication Networks (DRCN).

[6]  William H. Sanders,et al.  Stochastic Activity Networks: Formal Definitions and Concepts , 2002, European Educational Forum: School on Formal Methods and Performance Analysis.

[7]  I. Kamwa,et al.  Causes of the 2003 major grid blackouts in North America and Europe, and recommended means to improve system dynamic performance , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  F. Bouffard,et al.  Keeping the lights on and the information flowing , 2009, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[9]  M. Amin,et al.  National infrastructure as complex interactive networks , 2000 .

[10]  James P. Peerenboom,et al.  Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies , 2001 .

[11]  Jean-Claude Laprie,et al.  Modelling Interdependencies Between the Electricity and Information Infrastructures , 2007, SAFECOMP.

[12]  Gerd Kjolle,et al.  Incorporating short interruptions and time dependency of interruption costs in continuity of supply regulation , 2009 .

[13]  Hafiz Abdur Rahman,et al.  Identification of sources of failures and their propagation in critical infrastructures from 12 years of public failure reports , 2009, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructures.

[14]  D. Richard Kuhn,et al.  Sources of Failure in the Public Switched Telephone Network , 1997, Computer.