T2 relaxation time and delayed gadolinium‐enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) of human patellar cartilage at 1.5 T and 9.4 T: Relationships with tissue mechanical properties

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques have been developed for noninvasive assessment of the structure of articular cartilage. T2 relaxation time is sensitive to the integrity and orientation of the collagen network, while T1 relaxation time in presence of Gd‐DTPA2− (dGEMRIC) reflects the proteoglycan content of cartilage. In the present study, human patellar cartilage samples were investigated in vitro to determine the ability of MRI parameters to reveal topographical variations and to predict mechanical properties of cartilage at two different field strengths. T2 and dGEMRIC measurements at 1.5 T and 9.4 T were correlated with the static and dynamic compressive moduli at six anatomical locations of the patellar surface. Statistically significant linear correlations were observed between MRI and mechanical parameters at both field strengths, especially between T2 and Young's modulus. No significant difference was found between the T2 measurements at different field strengths in predicting mechanical properties of the tissue. Topographical variation of T2 values at both field strengths was similar to that of Young's moduli. The current results demonstrate the feasibility of quantitative MRI, particularly T2 mapping, to reflect the mechanical properties of human patellar cartilage at both field strengths. © 2005 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 24:366–374, 2006

[1]  A. Maroudas,et al.  Topographical Variation of Glycosaminoglycan Content in Normal and Fibrillated Tissue , 2022 .

[2]  Deborah Burstein,et al.  New MRI Techniques for Imaging Cartilage , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  Juha Töyräs,et al.  Prediction of biomechanical properties of articular cartilage with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  V. Mow,et al.  Swelling and curling behaviors of articular cartilage , 2006 .

[5]  Y. Xia,et al.  Quantitative in situ correlation between microscopic MRI and polarized light microscopy studies of articular cartilage. , 2001, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[6]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  T2 Quantitation of Human Articular Cartilage in a Clinical Setting at 1.5 T: Implementation and Testing of Four Multiecho Pulse Sequence Designs for Validity , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[7]  Jennifer S Wayne,et al.  MR imaging of normal and matrix-depleted cartilage: correlation with biomechanical function and biochemical composition. , 2003, Radiology.

[8]  G E Kempson,et al.  The short-term compressive properties of adult human articular cartilage. , 1994, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[9]  Miika T Nieminen,et al.  T2 of articular cartilage in the presence of Gd‐DTPA2− , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Juha Töyräs,et al.  Fibril reinforced poroelastic model predicts specifically mechanical behavior of normal, proteoglycan depleted and collagen degraded articular cartilage. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  A. Benninghoff,et al.  Form und Bau der Gelenkknorpel in ihren Beziehungen zur Funktion , 2004, Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie.

[12]  A Ratcliffe,et al.  Differences in patellofemoral joint cartilage material properties and their significance to the etiology of cartilage surface fibrillation. , 1997, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[13]  A Ratcliffe,et al.  Cartilage and diarthrodial joints as paradigms for hierarchical materials and structures. , 1992, Biomaterials.

[14]  Helen Brown,et al.  Applied Mixed Models in Medicine , 2000, Technometrics.

[15]  Alfred Benninghoff,et al.  Form und Bau der Gelenkknorpel in ihren Beziehungen zur Funktion , 1925, Zeitschrift für Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte.

[16]  H. Helminen,et al.  Characterization of enzymatically induced degradation of articular cartilage using high frequency ultrasound. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  I. Kiviranta,et al.  Delayed gadolinium‐enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 characteristics of human knee articular cartilage: Topographical variation and relationships to mechanical properties , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  B. Ansell Early studies of 198Au in the treatment of synovitis of the knee. , 1973, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[19]  J Silvennoinen,et al.  T2 relaxation reveals spatial collagen architecture in articular cartilage: A comparative quantitative MRI and polarized light microscopic study , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Yang Xia,et al.  Relaxation anisotropy in cartilage by NMR microscopy (μMRI) at 14‐μm resolution , 1998 .

[21]  Juha Töyräs,et al.  Spatial assessment of articular cartilage proteoglycans with Gd‐DTPA‐enhanced T1 imaging , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  E B Hunziker,et al.  Optical and mechanical determination of Poisson's ratio of adult bovine humeral articular cartilage. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  J Silvennoinen,et al.  Quantitative MR microscopy of enzymatically degraded articular cartilage , 2000, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[24]  D. Burstein,et al.  Nondestructive imaging of human cartilage glycosaminoglycan concentration by MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  V C Mow,et al.  Swelling and curling behaviors of articular cartilage. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[26]  G. Navon,et al.  The effect of detachment of the articular cartilage from its calcified zone on the cartilage microstructure, assessed by 2H‐spectroscopic double quantum filtered MRI , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[27]  H. Potter,et al.  T2 quantitation of articular cartilage at 1.5 T , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  S. Majumdar,et al.  T2 relaxation time of cartilage at MR imaging: comparison with severity of knee osteoarthritis. , 2004, Radiology.

[29]  Deborah Burstein,et al.  Spatially‐localized correlation of dGEMRIC‐measured GAG distribution and mechanical stiffness in the human tibial plateau , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[30]  H. Carr,et al.  The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism , 1961 .

[31]  H. J. Mankin,et al.  Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Articular Cartilage. Part II: Degeneration and Osteoarthrosis, Repair, Regeneration, and Transplantation*† , 1997 .

[32]  M S Laasanen,et al.  Proteoglycan and collagen sensitive MRI evaluation of normal and degenerated articular cartilage , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.