Advances in Rubber Compounds Using ZnO and MgO as Co-Cure Activators

Zinc oxide performs as the best cure activator in sulfur-based vulcanization of rubber, but it is regarded as a highly toxic material for aquatic organisms. Hence, the toxic cure activator should be replaced by a non-toxic one. Still, there is no suitable alternative industrially. However, binary activators combining ZnO and another metal oxide such as MgO can largely reduce the level of ZnO with some improved benefits in the vulcanization of rubber as investigated in this research. Curing, mechanical, and thermal characteristics were investigated to find out the suitability of MgO in the vulcanization of rubber. Curing studies reveal that significant reductions in the optimum curing times are found by using MgO as a co-cure activator. Especially, the rate of vulcanization with conventional 5 phr (per hundred grams) ZnO can be enhanced by more than double, going from 0.3 Nm/min to 0.85 Nm/min by the use of a 3:2 ratio of MgO to ZnO cure activator system that should have high industrial importance. Mechanical and thermal properties investigations suggest that MgO as a co-cure activator used at 60% can provide 7.5% higher M100 (modulus at 100% strain) (0.58 MPa from 0.54 MPa), 20% higher tensile strength (23.7 MPa from 19.5 MPa), 15% higher elongation at break (1455% from 1270%), 68% higher fracture toughness (126 MJ/m3 from 75 MJ/m3), and comparable thermal stability than conventionally using 100 % ZnO. Especially, MgO as a co-cure activator could be very useful for improving the fracture toughness in rubber compounds compared to ZnO as a single-site curing activator. The significant improvements in the curing and mechanical properties suggest that MgO and ZnO undergo chemical interactions during vulcanization. Such rubber compounds can be useful in advanced tough and stretchable applications.

[1]  Atanu Bag,et al.  Tough, transparent, biocompatible and stretchable thermoplastic copolymer with high stability and processability for soft electronics , 2022, Materials Today.

[2]  A. S. Nair,et al.  Role of Zinc Oxide in the Compounding Formulation on the Growth of Nonstoichiometric Copper Sulfide Nanostructures at the Brass–Rubber Interface , 2022, ACS omega.

[3]  Nakédia M. F. Carvalho,et al.  Replacement of ZnO by ecofriendly synthesized MgO in the NBR vulcanization , 2021, Polymer Bulletin.

[4]  R. Verdejo,et al.  Understanding the Molecular Dynamics of Dual Crosslinked Networks by Dielectric Spectroscopy , 2021, Polymers.

[5]  P. Potiyaraj,et al.  Synergistic activities of binary accelerators in presence of magnesium oxide as a cure activator in the vulcanization of natural rubber , 2021, Journal of Elastomers & Plastics.

[6]  Bo Li,et al.  Carbon nanodots as an eco-friendly activator of sulphur vulcanization in diene-rubber composites , 2021, Composites Communications.

[7]  T. Tan,et al.  Enhancing the Performance of Rubber with Nano ZnO as Activators. , 2020, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[8]  Milana,et al.  Zinc-Based Curing Activators: New Trends for Reducing Zinc Content in Rubber Vulcanization Process , 2019, Catalysts.

[9]  Z. Suo,et al.  Stretchable materials of high toughness and low hysteresis , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  P. Potiyaraj,et al.  PRECIPITATED NANO ZINC HYDROXIDE ON THE SILICA SURFACE AS AN ALTERNATIVE CURE ACTIVATOR IN THE VULCANIZATION OF NATURAL RUBBER , 2017 .

[11]  P. J. Kole,et al.  Wear and Tear of Tyres: A Stealthy Source of Microplastics in the Environment , 2017, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[12]  P. Potiyaraj,et al.  Synthesis of nano zinc hydroxide via sol–gel method on silica surface and its potential application in the reduction of cure activator level in the vulcanization of natural rubber , 2017, Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology.

[13]  K. Boonkerd,et al.  EFFECT OF SULFUR TO ACCELERATOR RATIO ON CROSSLINK STRUCTURE, REVERSION, AND STRENGTH IN NATURAL RUBBER , 2016 .

[14]  S. Mandal,et al.  Preparation of zinc‐oxide‐free natural rubber nanocomposites using nanostructured magnesium oxide as cure activator , 2015 .

[15]  G. Heinrich,et al.  Advances in layered double hydroxide (LDH)-based elastomer composites , 2014 .

[16]  S. Mandal,et al.  Synergism of novel thiuram disulfide and dibenzothiazyl disulfide in the vulcanization of natural rubber: curing, mechanical and aging resistance properties , 2014, International Journal of Industrial Chemistry.

[17]  S. Mandal,et al.  Sol–gel derived nano zinc oxide for the reduction of zinc oxide level in natural rubber compounds , 2014, Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology.

[18]  S. Mandal,et al.  Bis(N‐benzyl piperazino) thiuram disulfide and dibenzothiazyl disulfide as synergistic safe accelerators in the vulcanization of natural rubber , 2012 .

[19]  S. Mandal,et al.  EFFECT OF ZINC DITHIOCARBAMATES AND THIAZOLE-BASED ACCELERATORS ON THE VULCANIZATION OF NATURAL RUBBER , 2012 .

[20]  S. Borrós,et al.  ZINC OXIDE VERSUS MAGNESIUM OXIDE REVISITED. PART 2 , 2012 .

[21]  S. Borrós,et al.  ZINC OXIDE VERSUS MAGNESIUM OXIDE REVISITED. PART 1 , 2012 .

[22]  David A. Ladner,et al.  Solubility of nano‐zinc oxide in environmentally and biologically important matrices , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[23]  G. Heinrich,et al.  Preparation of zinc oxide free, transparent rubber nanocomposites using a layered double hydroxide filler , 2011 .

[24]  S. Borrós,et al.  Synthesis of Zn/Mg oxide nanoparticles and its influence on sulfur vulcanization , 2011 .

[25]  Chris D Vulpe,et al.  Differential gene expression in Daphnia magna suggests distinct modes of action and bioavailability for ZnO nanoparticles and Zn ions. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  Z. Dang,et al.  Preparation of nano‐zinc oxide/EPDM composites with both good thermal conductivity and mechanical properties , 2011 .

[27]  R. Scholz,et al.  Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO(2), ZnO, Ag, CNT, Fullerenes) for different regions. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  A. Bhowmick,et al.  Nanostructured magnesium oxide as cure activator for polychloroprene rubber. , 2009, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[29]  A. Bhowmick,et al.  Influence of ZnO nanoparticles on the cure characteristics and mechanical properties of carboxylated nitrile rubber , 2007 .

[30]  A. Bhowmick,et al.  Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles as cure activator on the properties of natural rubber and nitrile rubber , 2007 .

[31]  D. De,et al.  Reclaiming of ground rubber tire by a novel reclaiming agent. I. virgin natural rubber/reclaimed GRT vulcanizates , 2007 .

[32]  Yulong Ding,et al.  Investigation into the antibacterial behaviour of suspensions of ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO nanofluids) , 2007 .

[33]  J. Noordermeer,et al.  Multifunctional Additives as Zinc-Free Curatives for Sulfur Vulcanization , 2006 .

[34]  Wang Jincheng,et al.  Application of nano‐zinc oxide master batch in polybutadiene styrene rubber system , 2006 .

[35]  J. Noordermeer,et al.  Effect of Zinc Complexes as Activator for Sulfur Vulcanization in Various Rubbers , 2005 .

[36]  J. Noordermeer,et al.  Influence of zinc oxide during different stages of sulfur vulcanization. Elucidated by model compound studies , 2005 .

[37]  J. Noordermeer,et al.  Zinc loaded clay as activator in sulfur vulcanization: A new route for zinc oxide reduction in rubber compounds , 2004 .

[38]  Bo You,et al.  Preparation and characterization of poly(styrene butylacrylate) latex/nano‐ZnO nanocomposites , 2003 .

[39]  C. Das,et al.  Nanofiller as vulcanizing aid for styrene-butadiene elastomer , 2002 .

[40]  Richard H. Harris,et al.  Flammability Properties of Polymer - Layered-Silicate Nanocomposites. Polypropylene and Polystyrene Nanocomposites , 2000 .

[41]  W. Kuschner,et al.  Human pulmonary responses to experimental inhalation of high concentration fine and ultrafine magnesium oxide particles. , 1997, Environmental health perspectives.

[42]  W. Mcgill,et al.  A DSC study of curative interactions. I, The interaction of ZnO, sulfur, and stearic acid , 1991 .

[43]  W. Scheele Kinetic Studies of the Vulcanization of Natural and Synthetic Rubbers , 1961 .

[44]  D. Craig,et al.  Tetramethylthiuram Disulfide Vulcanization of Extracted Rubber. V. Low Molecular Products and the Mechanism of Zinc Oxide Activation , 1951 .

[45]  P. Flory,et al.  STATISTICAL MECHANICS OF CROSS-LINKED POLYMER NETWORKS II. SWELLING , 1943 .

[46]  S. Mandal,et al.  Development of a suitable nanostructured cure activator system for polychloroprene rubber nanocomposites with enhanced curing, mechanical and thermal properties , 2015, Polymer Bulletin.

[47]  S. K. Henning Reduced Zinc Loading : Using Zinc Monomethacrylate to Activate Accelerated Sulfur Vulcanization , 2010 .

[48]  J. Zawadiak,et al.  Zinc chelates as new activators for sulphur vulcanization of acrylonitrile-butadiene elastomer , 2009 .

[49]  M. Zaborski,et al.  The effect of zinc oxide nanoparticle morphology on activity in crosslinking of carboxylated nitrile elastomer , 2009 .

[50]  P. Pawłowski,et al.  Study on Reduction of Zinc Oxide Level in Rubber Compounds1: Part II Mechanism of Activation of Sulphur Vulcanisation by Means of the Interphase Transfer Catalyst 18-Crown-6-Ether , 2008 .

[51]  P. Pawłowski,et al.  Study on reduction of zinc oxide level in rubber compounds. Part I Influence of zinc oxide specific surface area and the interphase transfer catalyst 18-crown-6 , 2007 .

[52]  M. Akiba,et al.  Vulcanization and crosslinking in elastomers , 1997 .

[53]  G J Fosmire,et al.  Zinc toxicity. , 1990, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[54]  V. Ducháček Effect of zinc oxide concentration on the course of thiuram‐accelerated sulfur vulcanization , 1976 .

[55]  P. F. Onyon Polymer Handbook , 1972, Nature.

[56]  S. Kawahara,et al.  Evaluating Performance of Magnesium Oxide at Different Sizes as Activator for Natural Rubber Vulcanization , 2022 .