The importance for speech intelligibility of random fluctuations in "steady" background noise.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Brian C J Moore | Christian Füllgrabe | Michael A Stone | B. Moore | M. Stone | C. Füllgrabe | R. C. Mackinnon | Robert C Mackinnon
[1] B. Moore,et al. Relative contribution to speech intelligibility of different envelope modulation rates within the speech dynamic range. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] Brian C J Moore,et al. High-rate envelope information in many channels provides resistance to reduction of speech intelligibility produced by multi-channel fast-acting compression. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] Stuart Rosen,et al. Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] Joshua G. W. Bernstein,et al. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] Brian C J Moore,et al. The contribution of temporal fine structure to the intelligibility of speech in steady and modulated noise. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] Brian C J Moore,et al. Relative importance of different spectral bands to consonant identification: Relevance for frequency transposition in hearing aids , 2009, International journal of audiology.
[7] Brian C J Moore,et al. Spectro-Temporal Characteristics of Speech at High Frequencies, and the Potential for Restoration of Audibility to People with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss , 2008, Ear and hearing.
[8] B. Moore. The Role of Temporal Fine Structure Processing in Pitch Perception, Masking, and Speech Perception for Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired People , 2008, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[9] B. Moore,et al. Benefit of high-rate envelope cues in vocoder processing: effect of number of channels and spectral region. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] Brian C J Moore,et al. Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] Richard L Freyman,et al. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] Brian C J Moore,et al. Moderate cochlear hearing loss leads to a reduced ability to use temporal fine structure information. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] DeLiang Wang,et al. Isolating the energetic component of speech-on-speech masking with ideal time-frequency segregation. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] K. S. Rhebergen,et al. Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] Andrew Faulkner,et al. Perceptual adaptation by normally hearing listeners to a simulated "hole" in hearing. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] Brian C J Moore,et al. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[17] Martin Cooke,et al. A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] Frédéric Berthommier,et al. Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise , 2006, Hearing Research.
[19] Christian Lorenzi,et al. Speech masking release in listeners with flat hearing loss: Effects of masker fluctuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature reception , 2006, International journal of audiology.
[20] Emily Buss,et al. Temporal Fine-Structure Cues to Speech and Pure Tone Modulation in Observers with Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 2004, Ear and hearing.
[21] Peggy B Nelson,et al. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] Brian C. J. Moore,et al. Discrimination of the fundamental frequency of complex tones with fixed and shifting spectral envelopes by normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects , 2003, Hearing Research.
[23] Michael K. Qin,et al. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[24] Peggy B Nelson,et al. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] Kenneth N Stevens,et al. Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] B J Kwon,et al. Consonant identification under maskers with sinusoidal modulation: masking release or modulation interference? , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] R. Shannon,et al. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[28] Thomas Baer,et al. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing‐impaired and normally hearing people , 1997 .
[29] B. Moore,et al. Vowel identification based on amplitude modulation. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] S. Buus,et al. Discrimination of envelope frequency in one spectral region in the presence of modulation in another. , 1994, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] B C Moore,et al. Effects of carrier frequency and background noise on the detection of mixed modulation. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] R. Drullman. Temporal envelope and fine structure cues for speech intelligibility , 1994 .
[33] S P Bacon,et al. Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[34] J. Culling,et al. Auditory segregation of competing voices: absence of effects of FM or AM coherence. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[35] Tom R. Gaunt,et al. Across-channel Masking of Changes in Modulation Depth for Amplitude- and Frequency-modulated Signals , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[36] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[37] J H Grose,et al. Comodulation masking release and auditory grouping. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[38] W A Yost,et al. Modulation interference in detection and discrimination of amplitude modulation. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] S Buus,et al. Release from masking caused by envelope fluctuations. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[40] G. Studebaker. A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[41] C. Darwin,et al. Spectral integration based on common amplitude modulation , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.
[42] A. Duquesnoy. Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[43] R. Plomp. The Role of Modulation in Hearing , 1983 .