High Frequency Bipolar Electroporator with Double-Crowbar Circuit for Load-Independent Forming of Nanosecond Pulses

In this work, a novel electroporation system (electroporator) is presented, which is capable of forming high frequency pulses in a broad range of parameters (65 ns–100 µs). The electroporator supports voltages up to 3 kV and currents up to 40 A and is based on H-bridge circuit topology. A synchronized double crowbar driving sequence is introduced to generate short nanosecond range pulses independently of the electroporator load. The resultant circuit generates pulses with repetition frequencies up to 5 MHz and supports unipolar, bipolar, and asymmetrical pulse sequences with arbitrary waveforms. The shortest pulse duration step is hardware limited to 33 ns. The electroporator was experimentally tested on the H69AR human lung cancer cell line using 20 kV/cm bipolar and unipolar 100 ns–1 μs pulses. Based on a YO-PRO-1 permeabilization assay, it was determined that the electroporator is suitable for applied research on electroporation. The system offers high flexibility in experimental design to trigger various electroporation-based phenomena.

[1]  D. Miklavčič,et al.  Effects of Time Delay Between Unipolar Pulses in High Frequency Nano-Electrochemotherapy , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  A. Pakhomov,et al.  Four Channel 6.5 kV, 65 A, 100 ns–100 µs Generator with Advanced Control of Pulse and Burst Protocols for Biomedical and Biotechnological Applications , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[3]  D. Miklavčič,et al.  High-Frequency and High-Voltage Asymmetric Bipolar Pulse Generator for Electroporation Based Technologies and Therapies , 2021 .

[4]  D. Miklavčič,et al.  Electroporation with nanosecond pulses and bleomycin or cisplatin results in efficient cell kill and low metal release from electrodes. , 2021, Bioelectrochemistry.

[5]  Rafael V. Davalos,et al.  A Theoretical Argument for Extended Interpulse Delays in Therapeutic High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation Treatments , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  O. Pakhomova,et al.  The interplay of excitation and electroporation in nanosecond pulse stimulation. , 2020, Bioelectrochemistry.

[7]  V. Novickij,et al.  Concepts and Capabilities of In-House Built Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field (nsPEF) Generators for Electroporation: State of Art , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[8]  Hector Sarnago,et al.  Real-Time Impedance Monitoring During Electroporation Processes in Vegetal Tissue Using a High-Performance Generator , 2020, Sensors.

[9]  Voitech Stankevic,et al.  Compact Square-Wave Pulse Electroporator with Controlled Electroporation Efficiency and Cell Viability , 2020, Symmetry.

[10]  A. Ivorra,et al.  High-voltage pulsed electric field laboratory device with asymmetric voltage multiplier for marine macroalgae electroporation , 2020 .

[11]  E. Servienė,et al.  Effects of pulsed electric fields and mild thermal treatment on antimicrobial efficacy of nisin-loaded pectin nanoparticles for food preservation , 2020 .

[12]  Mark P. Styczynski,et al.  ElectroPen: An ultra-low–cost, electricity-free, portable electroporator , 2020, PLoS biology.

[13]  Y. D. de Novaes,et al.  Design and Assembly of a Bipolar Marx Generator Based on Full-Bridge Topology Applied to Electroporation , 2019, 2019 IEEE 15th Brazilian Power Electronics Conference and 5th IEEE Southern Power Electronics Conference (COBEP/SPEC).

[14]  O. Pakhomova,et al.  Excitation and electroporation by MHz bursts of nanosecond stimuli. , 2019, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[15]  T. Huiskamp,et al.  Fast Pulsed Power Generation With a Solid-State Impedance-Matched Marx Generator: Concept, Design, and First Implementation , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[16]  L. Redondo,et al.  Solid-State Generation of High-Frequency Burst of Bipolar Pulses for Medical Applications , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[17]  Rebecca M. Brock,et al.  High-frequency irreversible electroporation is an effective tumor ablation strategy that induces immunologic cell death and promotes systemic anti-tumor immunity , 2019, EBioMedicine.

[18]  Eva Pirc,et al.  Nanosecond Pulse Electroporator With Silicon Carbide mosfets: Development and Evaluation , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Hongmei Liu,et al.  Characterization of Conductivity Changes During High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation for Treatment Planning , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Chunqi Jiang,et al.  The second phase of bipolar, nanosecond-range electric pulses determines the electroporation efficiency. , 2018, Bioelectrochemistry.

[21]  D. Miklavčič,et al.  Plasma membrane depolarization and permeabilization due to electric pulses in cell lines of different excitability. , 2018, Bioelectrochemistry.

[22]  B. Ibey,et al.  Electropermeabilization of cells by closely spaced paired nanosecond-range pulses. , 2018, Bioelectrochemistry.

[23]  Richard E. Fan,et al.  Reduction of Muscle Contractions during Irreversible Electroporation Therapy Using High-Frequency Bursts of Alternating Polarity Pulses: A Laboratory Investigation in an Ex Vivo Swine Model. , 2018, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[24]  Shinji Hirakawa,et al.  High-Voltage, Multiphasic, Nanosecond Pulses to Modulate Cellular Responses , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[25]  Saulius Šatkauskas,et al.  High frequency electroporation efficiency is under control of membrane capacitive charging and voltage potential relaxation. , 2018, Bioelectrochemistry.

[26]  Zhihong Li,et al.  Parametric optimization of electric field strength for cancer electrochemotherapy on a chip-based model , 2018, Theranostics.

[27]  Audrius Grainys,et al.  High-frequency submicrosecond electroporator , 2016 .

[28]  O. Pakhomova,et al.  Multiple nanosecond electric pulses increase the number but not the size of long-lived nanopores in the cell membrane. , 2015, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[29]  D Packan,et al.  Effect of nanosecond pulsed electric field on Escherichia coli in water: inactivation and impact on protein changes , 2014, Journal of applied microbiology.

[30]  D. Miklavčič,et al.  Cell membrane electroporation- Part 1: The phenomenon , 2012, IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine.

[31]  M. Breton,et al.  Microsecond and nanosecond electric pulses in cancer treatments , 2012, Bioelectromagnetics.

[32]  Damijan Miklavcic,et al.  Equivalent Pulse Parameters for Electroporation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  Bioelectric effects of intense ultrashort pulses. , 2010, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[34]  Raji Sundararajan,et al.  Nanosecond Electroporation: Another Look , 2009, Molecular biotechnology.

[35]  Laura Marcu,et al.  Calcium bursts induced by nanosecond electric pulses. , 2003, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[36]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  The effects of intense submicrosecond electrical pulses on cells. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[37]  S. Rebersek,et al.  Electroporator for in vitro cell permeabilization , 2001 .

[38]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  Nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) effects on cells and tissues: apoptosis induction and tumor growth inhibition , 2001, PPPS-2001 Pulsed Power Plasma Science 2001. 28th IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science and 13th IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference. Digest of Papers (Cat. No.01CH37251).