Effect of the Reynolds Number on the Performance of a NACA0012 Wing with Leading Edge Protuberance at Low Reynolds Numbers

A study on the improvement of the NACA0012 wing performance in the low Reynolds number (Re) region of 10,000 ≤ Re ≤ 60,000 using a leading edge protuberance (LEP) was conducted. In this study, we focused on the effects of varying Re on the effectivity of the LEP. Wind tunnel tests and numerical simulations were performed to measure the wing performance and to visualize the flow structures around the airfoil. In the higher angle of attack region of α > 10∘, LEP causes the lift to increase independently of Re. Furthermore, in the lower angle of attack region, i.e., α ≤ 10∘, with Re ≤ 20,000, the lift coefficient also increases when using the LEP. The separation control is caused by the streamwise vortices generated by LEP which provides the momentum from the freestream flow into the separation region near the valley section, and the mechanism was basically the same at all Reynolds numbers and angle of attacks used in this study.

[1]  Z. Zuo,et al.  Numerical investigations of hydrodynamic performance of hydrofoils with leading-edge protuberances , 2015 .

[2]  Alfredo Pinelli,et al.  Investigation of wing stall delay effect due to an undulating leading edge : Combined LES and RANS study , 2013 .

[3]  Laurens E. Howle,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Sinusoidal Leading Edges , 2007 .

[4]  Joao M.M. Sousa,et al.  Low-Reynolds-Number Effects in Passive Stall Control Using Sinusoidal Leading Edges , 2012 .

[5]  F. Fish,et al.  Leading-edge tubercles delay stall on humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) flippers , 2004 .

[6]  Takashi Misaka,et al.  Low Reynolds Number Airfoil Design for a Mars Exploration Airplane Using a Transition Model , 2017 .

[7]  Hamid Johari,et al.  Computation of Flow Field Around an Airfoil with Leading-Edge Protuberances , 2012 .

[8]  Con J. Doolan,et al.  Reduction of flow induced airfoil tonal noise using leading edge sinusoidal modifications , 2012 .

[9]  Akira Oyama,et al.  A Study on Airfoil Design for Future Mars Airplane , 2006 .

[10]  F. Fish,et al.  Hydrodynamic design of the humpback whale flipper , 1995, Journal of morphology.

[11]  Hamid Johari,et al.  Effects of Leading-Edge Protuberances on Airfoil Performance , 2007 .

[12]  F. Nicoud,et al.  Subgrid-Scale Stress Modelling Based on the Square of the Velocity Gradient Tensor , 1999 .

[13]  Tomohisa Ohtake,et al.  Nonlinearity of the Aerodynamic Characteristics of NACA0012 Aerofoil at Low Reynolds Numbers , 2007 .

[14]  Marcelo H. Kobayashi,et al.  Numerical Study of stall delay on humpback whale flippers , 2008 .

[15]  Klaus A. Hoffmann,et al.  Numerical Analysis of Effects of Leading-Edge Protuberances on Aircraft Wing Performance , 2012 .

[16]  J. Meneghini,et al.  The Airfoil Thickness Effect on Wavy Leading Edge Performance , 2016 .

[17]  Z G Zuo,et al.  Numerical evaluations of the effect of leading-edge protuberances on the static and dynamic stall characteristics of an airfoil , 2013 .

[18]  K. Hansen,et al.  Performance Variations of Leading-Edge Tubercles for Distinct Airfoil Profiles , 2011 .

[20]  Spencer J. Sherwin,et al.  Direct numerical simulations of the flow around wings with spanwise waviness at a very low Reynolds number , 2017 .

[21]  Alfredo Pinelli,et al.  Control of the separated flow around an airfoil using a wavy leading edge inspired by humpback whale flippers , 2012 .