Touch can change visual slant perception

The visual system uses several signals to deduce the three-dimensional structure of the environment, including binocular disparity, texture gradients, shading and motion parallax. Although each of these sources of information is independently insufficient to yield reliable three-dimensional structure from everyday scenes, the visual system combines them by weighting the available information; altering the weights would therefore change the perceived structure. We report that haptic feedback (active touch) increases the weight of a consistent surface-slant signal relative to inconsistent signals. Thus, appearance of a subsequently viewed surface is changed: the surface appears slanted in the direction specified by the haptically reinforced signal.

[1]  C. S. Harris.  Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed, and displaced vision. , 1965, Psychological review.

[2]  R. Welch.  Perceptual Modification: Adapting to Altered Sensory Environments , 1978 .

[3]  I. Rock.  The nature of perceptual adaptation , 1969 .

[4]  James J. Clark,et al.  Data Fusion for Sensory Information Processing Systems , 1990 .

[5]  John P. Frisby,et al.  Interaction of stereo, texture and outline cues in the shape perception of three-dimensional ridges , 1993, Vision Research.

[6]  Dimitris C. Dracopoulos.  Dynamic Systems and Control , 1997 .

[7]  B. Rogers,et al.  The effect of display size on disparity scaling from differential perspective and vergence cues , 1996, Vision Research.

[8]  A. Parker,et al.  Integration of depth modules: Stereopsis and texture , 1993, Vision Research.

[9]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. , 1933 .

[10]  David C. Knill.  Discrimination of planar surface slant from texture: human and ideal observers compared , 1998, Vision Research.

[11]  G. Stratton.  Vision without inversion of the retinal image. , 1897 .

[12]  H. Pick,et al.  Intersensory Perception and Sensory Integration , 1981 .

[13]  S. Lederman,et al.  Texture perception: studies of intersensory organization using a discrepancy paradigm, and visual versus tactual psychophysics. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  D. Sheinberg,et al.  Shape from texture: ideal observers and human psychophysics , 1996 .

[15]  M. Banks,et al.  An Analysis of Binocular Slant Contrast , 1999, Perception.

[16]  M. Banks,et al.  Estimator Reliability and Distance Scaling in Stereoscopic Slant Perception , 1999, Perception.

[17]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[18]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Information integration in perception and communication , 1996 .

[19]  I ROCK,et al.  Vision and Touch: An Experimentally Created Conflict between the Two Senses , 1964, Science.

[20]  M F Bradshaw,et al.  Disparity Scaling and the Perception of Frontoparallel Surfaces , 1995, Perception.

[21]  James A. Crowell,et al.  Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception , 1999, Vision Research.

[22]  M. Landy,et al.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion , 1995, Vision Research.

[23]  B Gillam.  Stereoscopic Slant Reversals: A New Kind of ‘Induced’ Effect , 1993, Perception.

[24]  Andrew Blake,et al.  Shape from texture: Ideal observers and human psychophysics , 1993, Vision Research.