Predicting peptide structures using NMR data and deterministic global optimization

The ability to analyze large molecular structures by NMR techniques requires efficient methods for structure calculation. Currently, there are several widely available methods for tackling these problems, which, in general, rely on the optimization of penalty‐type target functions to satisfy the conformational restraints. Typically, these methods combine simulated annealing protocols with molecular dynamics and local minimization, either in distance or torsional angle space. In this work, both a novel formulation and algorithmic procedure for the solution of the NMR structure prediction problem is outlined. First, the unconstrained, penalty‐type structure prediction problem is reformulated using nonlinear constraints, which can be individually enumerated for all, or subsets, of the distance restraints. In this way, the violation can be controlled as a constraint, in contrast to the usual penalty‐type restraints. In addition, the customary simplified objective function is replaced by a full atom force field in the torsional angle space. This guarantees a better description of atomic interactions, which dictate the native structure of the molecule along with the distance restraints. The second novel portion of this work involves the solution method. Rather than pursue the typical simulated annealing procedure, this work relies on a deterministic method, which theoretically guarantees that the global solution can be located. This branch and bound technique, based on the αBB algorithm, has already been successfully applied to the identification of global minimum energy structures of peptides modeled by full atom force fields. Finally, the approach is applied to the Compstatin structure prediction, and it is found to possess some important merits when compared to existing techniques. ©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Comput Chem 20: 1354–1370, 1999

[1]  M Nilges,et al.  Structure calculation from NMR data. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.

[2]  Christodoulos A. Floudas,et al.  Rigorous convex underestimators for general twice-differentiable problems , 1996, J. Glob. Optim..

[3]  Christodoulos A. Floudas,et al.  Deterministic Global Optimization in Design, Control, and Computational Chemistry , 1997 .

[4]  Christodoulos A. Floudas,et al.  Global optimization for molecular conformation problems , 1993, Ann. Oper. Res..

[5]  John D Lambris,et al.  Inhibition of human complement by a C3-binding peptide isolated from a phage-displayed random peptide library. , 1996, Journal of immunology.

[6]  N Go,et al.  Calculation of protein conformations by proton-proton distance constraints. A new efficient algorithm. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  C. Floudas,et al.  A deterministic global optimization approach for molecular structure determination , 1994 .

[8]  Christodoulos A. Floudas,et al.  Prediction of Oligopeptide Conformations via Deterministic Global Optimization , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[9]  A. Neumaier,et al.  A global optimization method, αBB, for general twice-differentiable constrained NLPs — I. Theoretical advances , 1998 .

[10]  John L. Klepeis,et al.  Predicting solvated peptide conformations via global minimization of energetic atom-to-atom interactions , 1998 .

[11]  Christodoulos A Floudas,et al.  Global minimum potential energy conformations of small molecules , 1994, J. Glob. Optim..

[12]  K Wüthrich,et al.  Improved efficiency of protein structure calculations from NMR data using the program DIANA with redundant dihedral angle constraints , 1991, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[13]  P. Adams,et al.  New applications of simulated annealing in X-ray crystallography and solution NMR. , 1997, Structure.

[14]  Christodoulos A. Floudas,et al.  Global optimization of MINLP problems in Process Synthesis and Design , 1997 .

[15]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  K Wüthrich,et al.  Efficient computation of three-dimensional protein structures in solution from nuclear magnetic resonance data using the program DIANA and the supporting programs CALIBA, HABAS and GLOMSA. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  C. Adjiman,et al.  A global optimization method, αBB, for general twice-differentiable constrained NLPs—II. Implementation and computational results , 1998 .

[18]  C. Floudas,et al.  A global optimization approach for Lennard‐Jones microclusters , 1992 .

[19]  Christodoulos A. Floudas,et al.  αBB: A global optimization method for general constrained nonconvex problems , 1995, J. Glob. Optim..

[20]  Christodoulos A. Floudas,et al.  A global optimization method, αBB, for process design , 1996 .

[21]  John L. Klepeis,et al.  Comparative study of global minimum energy conformations of hydrated peptides , 1999 .

[22]  Dimitrios Morikis,et al.  Solution structure of Compstatin, a potent complement inhibitor , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[23]  Willard Miller,et al.  The IMA volumes in mathematics and its applications , 1986 .

[24]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Energy parameters in polypeptides. 10. Improved geometrical parameters and nonbonded interactions for use in the ECEPP/3 algorithm, with application to proline-containing peptides , 1994 .

[25]  A. Brünger,et al.  Torsion angle dynamics: Reduced variable conformational sampling enhances crystallographic structure refinement , 1994, Proteins.