Intercepting a moving target: On-line or model-based control?

When walking to intercept a moving target, people take an interception path that appears to anticipate the target's trajectory. According to the constant bearing strategy, the observer holds the bearing direction of the target constant based on current visual information, consistent with on-line control. Alternatively, the interception path might be based on an internal model of the target's motion, known as model-based control. To investigate these two accounts, participants walked to intercept a moving target in a virtual environment. We degraded the target's visibility by blurring the target to varying degrees in the midst of a trial, in order to influence its perceived speed and position. Reduced levels of visibility progressively impaired interception accuracy and precision; total occlusion impaired performance most and yielded nonadaptive heading adjustments. Thus, performance strongly depended on current visual information and deteriorated qualitatively when it was withdrawn. The results imply that locomotor interception is normally guided by current information rather than an internal model of target motion, consistent with on-line control.

[1]  John W Philbeck,et al.  Visually Directed Walking to Briefly Glimpsed Targets is not Biased toward Fixation Location , 2000, Perception.

[2]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Vision Research special issue on the “On-line Visual Control of Action” , 2015, Vision Research.

[3]  W. H. Warren,et al.  Behavioral dynamics of intercepting a moving target , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Behavioral dynamics of steering, obstacle avoidance, and route selection. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Gilles Montagne,et al.  Planning and on-line control of catching as a function of perceptual-motor constraints. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[6]  Mary Hayhoe,et al.  Saccades to future ball location reveal memory-based prediction in a virtual-reality interception task. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[7]  Brett R. Fajen,et al.  Intercepting moving targets: a little foresight helps a lot , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  D. Elliott,et al.  The influence of intermittent vision on manual aiming. , 1994, Acta psychologica.

[9]  Peter Thompson,et al.  Contrast and stimulus complexity moderate the relationship between spatial frequency and perceived speed: implications for MT models of speed perception. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[10]  D. Elliott,et al.  The effects of intermittent vision on prehension under binocular and monocular viewing. , 2003, Motor control.

[11]  Guy Wallis,et al.  Limitations of feedforward control in multiple-phase steering movements , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Luis A. Lesmes,et al.  Perceptual motion standstill in rapidly moving chromatic displays. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  J. Thomson Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  William H. Warren,et al.  Visually Controlled Locomotion: 40 years Later , 1998 .

[15]  William H Warren,et al.  Follow the leader: visual control of speed in pedestrian following. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[16]  Digby Elliott,et al.  Intermittent vision and one-handed catching: the temporal limits of binocular and monocular integration. , 2003, Motor control.

[17]  Gilles Montagne,et al.  Environmental constraints modify the way an interceptive action is controlled , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  A. Chardenon,et al.  The perceptual control of goal-directed locomotion: a common control architecture for interception and navigation? , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  William H. Warren,et al.  On-line and model-based approaches to the visual control of action , 2015, Vision Research.

[20]  Guy Wallis,et al.  An Unexpected Role for Visual Feedback in Vehicle Steering Control , 2002, Current Biology.

[21]  M. Lenoir,et al.  Intercepting Moving Objects During Self-Motion. , 1999, Journal of motor behavior.

[22]  Julien Bastin,et al.  Testing the role of expansion in the prospective control of locomotion , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  Constance S. Royden,et al.  From vision to action: experiments and models of steering control during driving. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  J M Loomis,et al.  Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  Brett R. Fajen,et al.  Controlling speed and direction during interception: an affordance-based approach , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  J. Gibson Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals. , 1998, British journal of psychology.

[27]  P. R. Davidson,et al.  Widespread access to predictive models in the motor system: a short review , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[28]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  On strong anticipation , 2010, Cognitive Systems Research.

[29]  D Elliott,et al.  I Lost It in the Lights: The Effects of Predictable and Variable Intermittent Vision on Unimanual Catching. , 1997, Journal of motor behavior.

[30]  Pim Haselager,et al.  Representationalism vs. anti-representationalism: A debate for the sake of appearance , 2003 .

[31]  A. Chardenon,et al.  The visual control of ball interception during human locomotion , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[32]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Visual Guidance of Intercepting a Moving Target on Foot , 2004, Perception.

[33]  J. Loomis,et al.  Visual space perception and visually directed action. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Astros Chatziastros,et al.  The role of visual and nonvisual feedback in a vehicle steering task. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  A. T. Smith,et al.  The influence of spatial frequency on perceived temporal frequency and perceived speed , 1990, Vision Research.

[36]  Geert J P Savelsbergh,et al.  Rate of Change of Angular Bearing as the Relevant Property in a Horizontal Interception Task During Locomotion , 2002, Journal of motor behavior.

[37]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[38]  Jeff B. Pelz,et al.  Predictive eye movements in natural vision , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Measuring Spatial Perception with Spatial Updating and Action , 2008 .

[40]  W. H. Warren The dynamics of perception and action. , 2006, Psychological review.

[41]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Computational principles of movement neuroscience , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  Andy Clark,et al.  Towards a Cognitive Robotics , 1999, Adapt. Behav..

[43]  J. Bastin,et al.  Prospective strategies underlie the control of interceptive actions. , 2006, Human movement science.

[44]  William H. Warren,et al.  Optic flow is used to control human walking , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Cynthia F Moss,et al.  Echolocating Bats Use a Nearly Time-Optimal Strategy to Intercept Prey , 2006, PLoS biology.

[46]  R. Olberg,et al.  Prey pursuit and interception in dragonflies , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[47]  J. Rieser,et al.  Visual Perception and the Guidance of Locomotion without Vision to Previously Seen Targets , 1990, Perception.

[48]  H T Whiting,et al.  Exposure and occluded duration effects in a ball-catching skill. , 1974, Journal of motor behavior.

[49]  D Elliott,et al.  Intermittent Vision and Discrete Manual Aiming , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[50]  O E Favreau,et al.  Perceived velocity of moving chromatic gratings. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[51]  H. Whiting,et al.  Visual occlusion factors in a discrete ball-catching task. , 1974, Journal of motor behavior.

[52]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Adaptation to suppression of visual information during catching , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[53]  J. Loomis,et al.  Model-based control of perception/action , 2004 .

[54]  Simon J. Bennett,et al.  To know or not to know: influence of explicit advance knowledge of occlusion on interceptive actions , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[55]  E. Wist,et al.  The spatial frequency effect on perceived velocity , 1976, Vision Research.

[56]  Joost C. Dessing,et al.  Adaptations of lateral hand movements to early and late visual occlusion in catching , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[57]  Mary Hayhoe,et al.  Memory and prediction in natural gaze control , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[58]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Does the brain model Newton's laws? , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[59]  James A. Thomson,et al.  On-Line Updating of Spatial Information Druing Locomotion Without Vision. , 1999, Journal of motor behavior.

[60]  Mary Hayhoe,et al.  The role of internal models and prediction in catching balls , 2005, AAAI 2005.

[61]  G. Montagne,et al.  A Robust Solution for Dealing With Environmental Changes in Intercepting Moving Balls , 2005, Journal of motor behavior.