Neural components underlying subjective preferential decision making

The objectives of the current study were twofold: (i) to investigate the neural precursors of the formation of a subjective preference of facial stimuli, and (ii) to characterize the spatiotemporal brain activity patterns distinguishing between preferred and non-preferred faces. Multivariate EEG signals were recorded while participants made preference decisions, based on approachability, between two faces presented sequentially with unrestricted viewing time; the decision being made after presentation of the second face. The paired faces were similar in their physical properties, emphasizing the role of the subjective experience of the participants in making the decisions. EEG signals were analyzed in terms of event-related-potential (ERP) components and wavelet-based time-frequency-representations (TFR). The behavioural data showed that the presentation order and the exposure duration did not influence preference formation. The EEG data showed three effects. The earliest effect, the sustained posterior ERP positivity for preferred first faces as compared to non-preferred first faces, was found following the onset of the first face, and this was interpreted as the formation of a positive first impression of the first face. The two later effects following the second faces were an increase of frontal theta band oscillations around 500 ms for preferred second faces and of posterior gamma band oscillations around 650 ms for preferred first faces; both of which were interpreted as being related to the formation of a preference. All of these effects occurred well before the moment of conscious decision, thereby suggesting the implicitness of these neurally identifiable components.

[1]  John Antonakis,et al.  Predicting Elections: Child's Play! , 2009, Science.

[2]  J. Bhattacharya,et al.  Deconstructing Insight: EEG Correlates of Insightful Problem Solving , 2008, PloS one.

[3]  David C. Reutens,et al.  Approachability and the amygdala: Insights from Williams syndrome , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Temporal isolation of neural processes underlying face preference decisions , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  D. Moore,et al.  Order Effects in Preference Judgments: Evidence for Context Dependence in the Generation of Preferences. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[6]  Bhavin R. Sheth,et al.  Posterior Beta and Anterior Gamma Oscillations Predict Cognitive Insight , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Petter Johansson,et al.  Failure to Detect Mismatches Between Intention and Outcome in a Simple Decision Task , 2005, Science.

[8]  M. Balconi,et al.  Consciousness and arousal effects on emotional face processing as revealed by brain oscillations. A gamma band analysis. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[9]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  A. Todorov,et al.  Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes , 2005, Science.

[11]  P. Glimcher Choice: Towards a Standard Back-pocket Model , 2009 .

[12]  R. Adolphs,et al.  The human amygdala in social judgment , 1998, Nature.

[13]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[14]  Harald T. Schupp,et al.  Emotional Facilitation of Sensory Processing in the Visual Cortex , 2003, Psychological science.

[15]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Neural affective decision theory: Choices, brains, and emotions , 2008, Cognitive Systems Research.

[16]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Neuroeconomics: decision making and the brain , 2008 .

[17]  A. Damasio,et al.  Neurobiology of Decision-Making , 2012, Research and Perspectives in Neurosciences.

[18]  Daphne N. Yu,et al.  High-resolution EEG mapping of cortical activation related to working memory: effects of task difficulty, type of processing, and practice. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  C. Tyler,et al.  What makes Mona Lisa smile? , 2004, Vision Research.

[20]  O. Jensen,et al.  Frontal theta activity in humans increases with memory load in a working memory task , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[21]  J. Kaiser,et al.  Human gamma-frequency oscillations associated with attention and memory , 2007, Trends in Neurosciences.

[22]  A. Damasio,et al.  Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Oscillatory Activity and Phase–Amplitude Coupling in the Human Medial Frontal Cortex during Decision Making , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Victor S. Johnston,et al.  Mate choice decisions: the role of facial beauty , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Reid Hastie,et al.  Order in Choice , 2009, Psychological science.

[27]  Masamichi Sakagami,et al.  [Decision making and the brain]. , 2004, Nihon seirigaku zasshi. Journal of the Physiological Society of Japan.

[28]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. , 2006, Psychological review.

[29]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Theta and Gamma Oscillations Predict Encoding and Retrieval of Declarative Memory , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  P. Ekman,et al.  Approach-withdrawal and cerebral asymmetry: emotional expression and brain physiology. I. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  Ray Johnson For Distinguished Early Career Contribution to Psychophysiology: Award Address, 1985 , 1986 .

[32]  Janine Willis,et al.  First Impressions , 2006, Psychological science.

[33]  R. Johnson A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[34]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[35]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Early interactions between orienting, visual sampling and decision making in facial preference , 2006, Vision Research.

[36]  M. Grigutsch,et al.  Music and emotion: electrophysiological correlates of the processing of pleasant and unpleasant music. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[37]  W. Newsome,et al.  The Trouble with Choice: Studying Decision Variables in the Brain , 2009 .

[38]  James M. Kilner,et al.  Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  W. Klimesch,et al.  The functional significance of theta and upper alpha oscillations. , 2005, Experimental psychology.

[40]  W. Sommer,et al.  Facial attractiveness modulates early and late event-related brain potentials , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[41]  Victor S. Johnston,et al.  Facial beauty and the late positive component of event‐related potentials , 1997 .