Back to the future: embodied classroom simulations of animal foraging

This paper describes the design and pilot enactment of an instructional unit for elementary school students, Hunger Games, which centers on development of learner understandings of animal foraging behavior. Inspired by traditional teaching practices employing physical simulations, within the unit students engage in an embodied enactment of foraging using stuffed animals (with embedded RFID tags) as tangible avatars to represent their foraging among food patches (with camouflaged RFID readers) distributed around a classroom. Displays situated near the food patches provide students with information regarding the energy gain as the forage in the environment. A two-period pilot enactment of the unit demonstrated the feasibility of the design for classroom use, evidenced the development of affective relationships between learners and avatars, and afforded the emergence of unanticipated behaviors that promoted new questions about the science phenomena. The results suggest provisional support for the effectiveness of the unit as a science learning environment.

[1]  D. Perkins,et al.  Teaching for Transfer. , 1988 .

[2]  Nicolai Marquardt,et al.  Proxemic interactions: the new ubicomp? , 2011, INTR.

[3]  Patrick Jermann,et al.  Classroom orchestration: The third circle of usability , 2011, CSCL.

[4]  David Birchfield,et al.  SMALLab: a mediated platform for education , 2006, SIGGRAPH '06.

[5]  Justine Cassell,et al.  Virtual peers as partners in storytelling and literacy learning , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[6]  Victor R. Lee,et al.  Quantified recess: design of an activity for elementary students involving analyses of their own movement data , 2013, IDC.

[7]  Steven Allender,et al.  Understanding participation in sport and physical activity among children and adults: a review of qualitative studies. , 2006, Health education research.

[8]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Using 'tangibles' to promote novel forms of playful learning , 2003, Interact. Comput..

[9]  Noel Enyedy,et al.  Play and Augmented Reality in Learning Physics: The SPASES Project , 2011, CSCL.

[10]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  A Large-Scale Evaluation of an Intelligent Discovery World: Smithtown , 1990, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[11]  James D. Slotta,et al.  Scaffolding Knowledge Communities in the Classroom: New Opportunities in the Web 2.0 Era , 2010 .

[12]  Lev Vygotsky Mind in society , 1978 .

[13]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Problem-based Learning: A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions , 2000 .

[14]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[15]  Tom Moher,et al.  Embedded phenomena: supporting science learning with classroom-sized distributed simulations , 2006, CHI.

[16]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided discovery in a community of learners. , 1994 .

[17]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Human foraging behavior in a virtual environment , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Joshua Radinsky,et al.  I see you there!: developing identity-preserving embodied interaction for museum exhibits , 2013, CHI.

[19]  Joshua A. Danish,et al.  BeeSim: leveraging wearable computers in participatory simulations with young children , 2010, IDC.

[20]  James D. Slotta,et al.  Orchestrating of complex inquiry: three roles for learning analytics in a smart classroom infrastructure , 2013, LAK '13.

[21]  Ellen S. Beaumont,et al.  Promoting Interactive Learning: A Classroom Exercise to Explore Foraging Strategies , 2012 .

[22]  David S. Kirk,et al.  Savannah: mobile gaming and learning? , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..