Using Probability vs. Nonprobability Sampling to Identify Hard-to-Access Participants for Health-Related Research

This article compares the recruitment costs and participant characteristics associated with the use of probability and nonprobability sampling strategies in a longitudinal study of older hemodialysis patients and their spouses. Contrasts were made of people who accrued to the study based on probability and nonprobability sampling strategies. Probability-based sampling was more time-efficient and cost-effective than nonprobability sampling. There were no significant differences between the respondents identified through probability and nonprobability sampling on age, gender, years married, education, work status, and professional job status. Respondents from the probability sample were more likely to be Protestant and less likely to be Catholic than those from the nonprobability sample. Respondents from the probability sample were more likely to be Black, whereas those from the nonprobability sample were more likely to be White. There are strengths and shortcomings associated with both nonprobability and probability sampling. Researchers need to consider representativeness and external validity issues when designing sampling and related recruitment plans for health-related research.

[1]  G. Swanson,et al.  Design of a Case Management Approach to Enhance Cancer Screening Trial Retention Among Older African American Men , 2004, Journal of aging and health.

[2]  Marcia G. Ory,et al.  Recruitment of Older Participants in Frailty/Injury Prevention Studies , 2002, Prevention Science.

[3]  Douglas P Olsen HIPAA Privacy Regulations and Nursing Research , 2003, Nursing research.

[4]  M. Rotheram-Borus,et al.  Successful recruitment and retention of participants in longitudinal behavioral research. , 2003, AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education.

[5]  L. George Research design in end-of-life research: state of science. , 2002, The Gerontologist.

[6]  Sandra J. Fulton Picot,et al.  Effective Sampling of Rare Population Elements , 2001 .

[7]  E. Funkhouser,et al.  Alternative strategies for selecting population controls: comparison of random digit dialing and targeted telephone calls. , 2000, Annals of epidemiology.

[8]  N. Borhani,et al.  Mass mailing and staff experience in a total recruitment program for a clinical trial: the SHEP experience. Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program. Cooperative Research Group. , 1999, Controlled clinical trials.

[9]  C. Boult,et al.  Soliciting defined populations to recruit samples of high-risk older adults. , 1998, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[10]  M. Rose,et al.  Recruiting research participants: a comparison of the costs and effectiveness of five recruitment strategies. , 1998, The Gerontologist.

[11]  Myrna Silverman,et al.  Recruiting older adults for clinical trials. , 1997, Controlled clinical trials.

[12]  G. Swanson,et al.  Recruiting minorities into clinical trials: toward a participant-friendly system. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  Elazar J. Pedhazur,et al.  Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach , 1994 .

[14]  Bernard J. Quinn Churches and church membership in the United States, 1980 : an enumeration by region, state, and county, based on data reported by 111 church bodies , 1982 .

[15]  R. L. Archer,et al.  Research methods in social relations, 3rd ed. , 1976 .

[16]  A. R. Ilersic,et al.  Research methods in social relations , 1961 .

[17]  M. Deutsch,et al.  Research Methods in Social Relations , 1952 .