Pigeon Pattern Perception: Limits on Perspective Invariance

Two experiments are reported in which the response of pigeons to perspective transformations of a pattern target was measured. In the first experiment an alphabet letter was taken as the pattern target (the ‘positive’) and the response to its perspective transforms was compared to the response to nontarget letters (‘negatives’) over the course of discrimination training. In the second experiment irregular quadrilaterals were used as positives and the responses to slight perspective deformations of the prototypes were compared to the responses to random transformations of the same magnitude under steady-state conditions. The amount of differential responding depended on the type of transformation. There was no differential response to targets rotated in the picture plane or around the horizontal axis in either experiment. There was differential response to small reductions and enlargements of the target. There was also differential response to translated targets, and this was seen irrespective of the amount of displacement. Results from targets rotated around the vertical axis were erratic, some target-plus-angle combinations elicited differential responding, but most did not. The erratic responses are attributed to symmetries in pattern elements that were abstracted as critical features. Pigeons therefore exhibit no true rotation invariance, limited size invariance, and complete shift invariance. It is argued that size invariance, but not position invariance, may depend on prior exposure to the alternatives.

[1]  Michael L. Commons,et al.  Behavioral approaches to pattern recognition and concept formation , 2019 .

[2]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Complex Visual Concept in the Pigeon , 1964, Science.

[3]  John Cerella,et al.  Pigeons and perceptrons , 1986, Pattern Recognit..

[4]  Eric L. Schwartz,et al.  Computational anatomy and functional architecture of striate cortex: A spatial mapping approach to perceptual coding , 1980, Vision Research.

[5]  D S Blough Effects of the number and form of stimuli on visual search in the pigeon. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[6]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categories, subcategories, and pseudocategories. , 1988 .

[7]  M. Posner,et al.  Perceived distance and the classification of distorted patterns. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Natural concepts in pigeons. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[9]  Towe Al A study of figural equivalence in the pigeon. , 1954 .

[10]  D. Blough,et al.  The discrimination of mirror-image forms by pigeons , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  J. G. Holland,et al.  The effect of the blackout method on acquisition and generalization. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  Mandyam D. Srinath,et al.  Contour sequence moments for the classification of closed planar shapes , 1987, Pattern Recognit..

[13]  John Cerella,et al.  The pigeon's analysis of pictures , 1980, Pattern Recognit..

[14]  D S Blough,et al.  Discrimination of letters and random dot patterns by pigeons and humans. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[15]  Richard J. Herrnstein,et al.  Fish as a Natural Category for People and Pigeons1 , 1980 .

[16]  Stephen E G Lea,et al.  Pigeons Learn the Concept of an ‘A’ , 1976, Perception.

[17]  John Cerella,et al.  Absence of perspective processing in the pigeon , 1977, Pattern Recognit..

[18]  D E Carter,et al.  Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[19]  Celia M. Lombardi,et al.  Size Invariance in Visual Pattern Recognition by Pigeons , 2019, Quantitative Analyses of Behavior.

[20]  D. Blough,et al.  Pigeon discrimination of letters and other forms in texture displays , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  M. Goodale Interocular transfer in the pigeon after lesions of the dorsal supraoptic decussation , 1985, Behavioural Brain Research.

[22]  Ernesto Bribiesca,et al.  How to describe pure form and how to measure differences in shapes using shape numbers , 1980, Pattern Recognit..

[23]  M A Goodale,et al.  Visually guided pecking in the pigeon (Columba livia). , 1983, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[24]  E. Hearst,et al.  Generalization and discrimination of shape orientation in the pigeon. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[25]  Sharon L. Greene,et al.  Pigeon visual memory capacity. , 1984 .

[26]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Size and Position Invariance in the Visual System , 1978, Perception.

[27]  J D Delius,et al.  Rotational invariance in visual pattern recognition by pigeons and humans. , 1982, Science.

[28]  J. Cerella Visual classes and natural categories in the pigeon. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Ralph Roskies,et al.  Fourier Descriptors for Plane Closed Curves , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[30]  D. P. Ferraro,et al.  Discrimination and Generalization of Complex Visual Shape Variations in Pigeons , 1972, Perceptual and motor skills.

[31]  Chun-Shin Lin,et al.  New forms of shape invariants from elliptic fourier descriptors , 1987, Pattern Recognit..

[32]  R. Pisacreta,et al.  Matching of varying-size form stimuli in the pigeon , 1984 .

[33]  J. Cerella Shape Constancy in the Pigeon: The Perspective Transformations Decomposed , 2019, Quantitative Analyses of Behavior.

[34]  D. Pollen,et al.  Spatial computation performed by simple and complex cells in the visual cortex of the cat , 1982, Vision Research.

[35]  D. Mclachlan The Role of Optics in Applying Correlation Functions to Pattern Recognition , 1962 .

[36]  Zhi-Qiang Liu,et al.  On the minimum number of templates required for shift, rotation and size invariant pattern recognition , 1988, Pattern Recognit..

[37]  A. Towe A study of figural equivalence in the pigeon. , 1954, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[38]  John A. Orr,et al.  Applications of Tensor Theory to Object Recognition and Orientation Determination , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[39]  Demetri Psaltis,et al.  Recognitive Aspects of Moment Invariants , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.